Effects of peer- versus self-editing on students’ revision of language errors in revised drafts

System - Tập 38 Số 1 - Trang 85-95 - 2010
Nuwar Mawlawi Diab1
1Department of Humanities, Lebanese American University, Chouran 13-5053, Beirut, Lebanon

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Allaei, 1990, Using performative assessment instruments with ESL student writers, 227

Berg, 1999, The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality, Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 215, 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80115-5

Byrd, 2003, Practical tips for implementing peer editing tasks in the foreign language classroom, Foreign Language Annals, 26, 434, 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2003.tb02125.x

Carson, 1996, Chinese students’ perception of ESL peer response group interaction, Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 1, 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90012-0

Chandler, 2003, The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267, 10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9

Connors, 1988

De Guerrero, 2000, Activating the ZPD: mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision, The Modern Language Journal, 84, 51, 10.1111/0026-7902.00052

Donato, 1994, Collective scaffolding in second language learning, 33

Ellis, 2002, Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge?, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 223, 10.1017/S0272263102002073

Ellis, 2008, The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context, System, 36, 10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001

Fathman, 1990, Teacher response to student writing: focus on form versus content, 178

Ferris, 1997, The influence of teacher commentary on student revision, TESOL Quarterly, 31, 315, 10.2307/3588049

Ferris, 1999, The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: a response to Truscott (1996), Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1, 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80110-6

Ferris, 2006, Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction, 81

Ferris, 2001, Error feedback in L2 writing classes. How explicit does it need to be?, Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161, 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X

Hamp-Lyons, 1991

Holunga, S., 1994. The Effect of Metacognitive Strategy Training with Verbalization on the Oral Accuracy of Adult Second Language Learners. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toronto (OISE), Toronto.

Kepner, 1991, An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills, The Modern Language Journal, 75, 305, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05359.x

Leki, 1991, The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes, Foreign Language Annals, 24, 203, 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00464.x

Liebman, 1992, Toward a new contrastive rhetoric: differences between Arabic and Japanese rhetorical instruction, Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 141, 10.1016/1060-3743(92)90013-F

Lunsford, 2008, Mistakes are a fact of life: a national comparative study, College Composition and Communication, 781, 10.58680/ccc20086677

Mangelsdorf, 1992, ESL student response stances in a peer-review task, Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 235, 10.1016/1060-3743(92)90005-A

McGroarty, 1997, Triangulation in classroom research: a study of peer revision, Language Learning, 47, 1, 10.1111/0023-8333.11997001

McLaughlin, 1987

Min, 2006, The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality, Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 118, 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003

Min, 2005, Training students to become successful peer reviewers, System, 33, 293, 10.1016/j.system.2004.11.003

Norris, 2000, Effectiveness in L2 Instruction: a research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis, Language Learning, 50, 417, 10.1111/0023-8333.00136

Ohta, 2000, Rethinking interaction in SLS: developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar, 51

Ohta, 2001

Reichelt, 1999, Toward a more comprehensive view of L2 writing: foreign language writing in the US, Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 181, 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80127-1

Schmid, L.M., 1999. The Effects of Peer Response on Essay Drafts, Unpublished MA Thesis in TESOL, Department of English, California State University, Sacramento.

Schmidt, 2001, Attention, 3

Stanley, 1992, Coaching student writers to be effective peer editors, Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 217, 10.1016/1060-3743(92)90004-9

Swain, 2002, Talking it through: two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation, International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285, 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00006-5

Truscott, 1996, The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes, Language Learning, 46, 327, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x

Truscott, 2004, Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: a response to Chandler, Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 337, 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.05.002

Truscott, 2007, The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately, Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255, 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.003

Villamil, 1996, Peer revision in the L2 classroom: social–cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior, Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 51, 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90015-6

Zhang, 1995, Thoughts on some recent evidence concerning the affective advantage of peer feedback, Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 321, 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80119-2