Effects of ontogeny and soil nutrient supply on production, allocation, and leaf area efficiency in loblolly and slash pine stands

Canadian Journal of Forest Research - Tập 30 Số 10 - Trang 1511-1524 - 2000
Eric J. Jokela, Timothy A. Martin

Tóm tắt

The effects of ontogeny and soil nutrient supply on aboveground biomass accumulation, allocation, and stemwood growth efficiency of loblolly (Pinus taeda L.) and slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. var. elliottii) were investigated in north-central Florida over 16 years using a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial experiment (species, fertilization, weed control). Aboveground biomass growth responses to the combined fertilizer and weed control treatments (FW) averaged ~2- and 2.8-fold for slash and loblolly pine, respectively. In the same treatment, annual needlefall (NF) production for slash pine approached a "steady state" of 6 Mg·ha-1 at ages 8-14 years, while loblolly pine NF production peaked at 7 Mg·ha-1 at age 10 years, and then declined 17% following curtailment of the fertilizer treatment. Periodic stemwood biomass increment (PAI) for the FW treatment for both species culminated at about 15 Mg·ha-1·year-1 at age 8 years and then declined rapidly (~275%) to <4 Mg·ha-1·year-1 at 15 years; reductions for the untreated control were considerably slower. The progressive decline in PAI following peak leaf area development was closely associated with a decrease in stemwood production per unit leaf area (growth efficiency). A unit increase in leaf area index in the 7- to 9-year-old stands produced about 3.0 and 3.1 times more stemwood biomass per year than in the 14- to 16-year-old stands for loblolly and slash pine, respectively.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Albaugh T.J., 1998, For. Sci., 44, 317

Allen H.L., 1987, J. For., 85, 37

Allen H.L., 1990, For. Ecol. Manage., 30, 437, 10.1016/0378-1127(90)90153-3

Baskerville G.L., 1972, Can. J. For. Res., 2, 49, 10.1139/x72-009

Beadle C.L., 1997, Monogr., 43, 169

Beets P.N., 1987, N.Z. J. For. Sci., 17, 246

Beets P.N., 1996, Tree Physiol., 16, 131, 10.1093/treephys/16.1-2.131

Bengtson G.W., 1979, J. For., 78, 222

Binkley D., 1995, Can. J. For. Res., 25, 621, 10.1139/x95-069

Colbert S.R., 1990, For. Sci., 36, 995

Creighton J.L., 1987, South. J. Appl. For., 11, 223, 10.1093/sjaf/11.4.223

Cromer R.N., 1982, Aust. J. Bot., 30, 265, 10.1071/BT9820265

Dalla-Tea F., 1991, For. Sci., 37, 1298

DeBell D.S., 1989, For. Sci., 35, 708

Dougherty P.M., 1995, For. Ecol. Manage., 72, 213, 10.1016/0378-1127(95)97452-X

Forrest W.G., 1970, J. Appl. Ecol., 7, 177, 10.2307/2401618

Gholz H.L., 1982, Ecology, 63, 1827, 10.2307/1940124

Gholz H.L., 1991, Florida. Ecol. Monogr., 61, 33, 10.2307/1942998

Gower S.T., 1994, Ecol. Bull., 43, 115

Gower S.T., 1996, Trends Ecol. Evol., 11, 378, 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10042-2

Greenwood M.S., 1995, Tree Physiol., 15, 433, 10.1093/treephys/15.7-8.433

Grierson P.F., 1999, Biol. Fertil. Soils, 28, 244, 10.1007/s003740050489

Harding R.B., 1994, Soc. Am. J., 58, 216, 10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800010032x

Harms W.R., 1994, Can. J. For. Res., 24, 511, 10.1139/x94-068

Harms W.R., 2000, For. Ecol. Manage., 126, 13, 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00079-1

Heilman P.E., 1994, Tree Physiol., 14, 911, 10.1093/treephys/14.7-8-9.911

Hubbard R.M., 1999, Tree Physiol., 19, 165, 10.1093/treephys/19.3.165

Jokela E.J., 1993, South. J. Appl. For., 17, 135, 10.1093/sjaf/17.3.135

Jokela E.J., 1988, For. Sci., 35, 832

Jokela E.J., 2000, South. J. Appl. For., 24, 23, 10.1093/sjaf/24.1.23

Jorgensen J.R., 1980, Soc. Am. J., 44, 1307, 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400060036x

Kinerson R.S., 1974, J. Appl. Ecol., 11, 347, 10.2307/2402026

Kira T., 1967, Pacific. Jpn. J. Ecol., 17, 70

Kvalseth T.O., 1985, Am. Stat., 39, 279

Long J.N., 1992, J. Appl. Ecol., 27, 1

Loo J.A., 1985, Silvae Genet., 34, 14

Madgwick H.A.I., 1970, For. Sci., 16, 154

Martin T.A., 1990, For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-70., 376

McCrady R.L., 1998, For. Sci., 44, 64

Mencuccini M., 1996, Plant Cell Environ., 19, 939, 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb00458.x

Miller H.G., 1981, Forestry, 54, 157, 10.1093/forestry/54.2.157

Miller J.H., 1991, South. J. Appl. For., 15, 169, 10.1093/sjaf/15.4.169

Møller C.M., 1947, J. For., 45, 393

Murphy J., 1962, Anal. Chim. Acta, 27, 31, 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5

Murty D., 1996, Tree Physiol., 16, 187, 10.1093/treephys/16.1-2.187

Ovington J.D., 1957, Ann. Bot. (London), 21, 287, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083565

Polglase P.J., 1992, Soc. Am. J., 56, 573, 10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600020037x

Polglase P.J., 1992, Soc. Am. J., 56, 921, 10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600030040x

Polglase P.J., 1992, Soc. Am. J., 56, 566, 10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600020036x

Polglase P.J., 1992, Soc. Am. J., 56, 914, 10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600030039x

Pritchett W.L., 1982, Soc. Am. J., 46, 640, 10.2136/sssaj1982.03615995004600030038x

Pritchett W.L., 1966, Soc. Am. Proc., 30, 509, 10.2136/sssaj1966.03615995003000040031x

Ryan M.G., 1992, Ecology, 73, 2100, 10.2307/1941458

Ryan M.G., 1997, BioScience, 47, 235, 10.2307/1313077

Ryan M.G., 1997, Adv. Ecol. Res., 27, 213, 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60009-4

Samuelson L.J., 1998, For. Sci., 44, 308

Shiver B.D., 1990, South. J. Appl. For., 14, 183, 10.1093/sjaf/14.4.183

Smith F.W., 1999, For. Sci., 45, 333

Swindel B.F., 1988, South. J. Appl. For., 12, 116, 10.1093/sjaf/12.2.116

Switzer G.L., 1966, Soc. Am. Proc., 30, 114, 10.2136/sssaj1966.03615995003000010037x

Vose J.M., 1988, For. Sci., 34, 547