Effects of food abundance and wind on the use of tree lines by an insectivorous bat, <i>Pipistrellus pipistrellus</i>

Canadian Journal of Zoology - Tập 77 Số 9 - Trang 1393-1401 - 1999
B.L. Verboom, Kamiel Spoelstra

Tóm tắt

We tested the hypotheses that the distance bats fly from tree lines depend on food abundance and protection from wind. We monitored the activity of pipistrelle bats (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) and measured insect abundance and wind speed and direction at fixed distances up to 50 m from tree lines. We compared bat behaviour in different situations: with and without wind and with low and high insect abundances in adjacent open areas. In all situations, pipistrelle bats' activity decreased with increasing distance from the tree line. Within nights, we found no effect of wind speed on bat activity (sound recorded per 5 min) on the leeward side of the tree lines. Between nights, however, bats concentrated their activities closer to the tree lines at high wind speeds or angles of incidence of wind from 45° to 90°. A significant relationship between bat and insect abundances was found only when the tree line was bordered by insect-rich grassland. Since wind and insect abundance only partly explained the distances bats flew from tree lines, two alternative explanations, namely predator avoidance and the use of tree lines as acoustic landmarks, are discussed. Pipistrelle bats using a double row of trees as a commuting route at dusk flew mainly between the tree lines, regardless of insect abundance or wind speed. It is argued that predator avoidance explains this behaviour, being a constraint on movements of bats at relatively high light levels. At high wind speeds and angles of incidence greater than 45°, the proportion of pipistrelle bats commuting on the leeward side of the tree lines increased.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Brigham R.M., 1997, Can. J. Zool., 75, 131, 10.1139/z97-017

Britton A.R.C., 1997, J. Zool. (Lond.), 241, 503, 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1997.tb04842.x

Ekman M., 1996, J. Zool. (Lond.), 238, 571, 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1996.tb05414.x

Fenton M.B., 1994, Anim. Behav., 48, 9, 10.1006/anbe.1994.1207

Grindal S.D., 1998, J. Wildl. Manage., 62, 996, 10.2307/3802552

Jones G., 1993, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 251, 119, 10.1098/rspb.1993.0017

Kalko E.K.V., 1993, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 33, 415

Krull D., 1991, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 28, 247, 10.1007/BF00175097

Lewis T., 1969, J. Appl. Ecol., 6, 443, 10.2307/2401510

Lewis T., 1969, J. Appl. Ecol., 6, 453, 10.2307/2401511

Lewis T., 1970, Ann. Appl. Biol., 65, 213, 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1970.tb04581.x

Lewis T., 1970, Ann. Appl. Biol., 66, 477, 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1970.tb04627.x

Lewis T., 1966, Ann. Appl. Biol., 58, 355, 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1966.tb04395.x

Limpens H.J.G.A., 1991, Myotis, 29, 63

Limpens H.J.G.A., 1989, Lutra, 32, 1

Nägeli W., 1946, Mitt. Schweiz. Anst. Vorstl. Versuchswes., 24, 659

Norberg U.M., 1987, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 316, 335, 10.1098/rstb.1987.0030

Nyholm E.S., 1965, Ann. Zool. Fenn., 2, 77

Racey P., 1985, J. Anim. Ecol., 54, 205, 10.2307/4631

Rieger I., 1990, Mitt. Naturforsch. Ges. Schaffhausen, 35, 37

Rydell J., 1994, Folia Zool., 43, 417

Rydell J., 1996, Oikos, 76, 243, 10.2307/3546196

Saville D.J., 1990, Am. Stat., 44, 174

Speakman J.R., 1991, Mammal Rev., 21, 123, 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1991.tb00114.x

Vaughan N., 1997, Bioacoustics, 7, 189, 10.1080/09524622.1997.9753331

Verboom B., 1997, Landscape Ecol., 12, 117, 10.1007/BF02698211

Verboom B., 1999, J. Zool. (Lond.), 248, 59, 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb01022.x

Walsh A.L., 1996, J. Appl. Ecol., 33, 508, 10.2307/2404980

Walsh A.L., 1996, J. Appl. Ecol., 33, 519, 10.2307/2404981

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Canadian Journal of Zoology

Tập 77 Số 9

1393-1401

Thông tin tác giả