Effects of blocking patents on R&D: a quantitative DGE analysis

Journal of Economic Growth - Tập 14 - Trang 55-78 - 2009
Angus C. Chu1
1Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan

Tóm tắt

What are the effects of blocking patents on R&D and consumption? This paper develops a quality-ladder growth model with overlapping intellectual property rights and capital accumulation to quantitatively evaluate the effects of blocking patents. The analysis focuses on two policy variables (a) patent breadth that determines the amount of profits created by an invention and (b) the profit-sharing rule that determines the distribution of profits between current and former inventors along the quality ladder. The model is calibrated to aggregate data of the US economy. Under parameter values that match key features of the US economy and show equilibrium R&D underinvestment, I find that optimizing the profit-sharing rule of blocking patents would lead to a significant increase in R&D, consumption and welfare. Also, the paper derives and quantifies a dynamic distortionary effect of patent policy on capital accumulation.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Acemoglu D. (2009) Introduction to modern economic growth. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ Acemoglu, D., & Akcigit, U. (2008). State dependent intellectual property rights policy. NBER Working Paper No. 12775. Aghion P., Howitt P. (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60: 323–351. doi:10.2307/2951599 Arnold L.G. (2006) The dynamics of the Jones R&D growth model. Review of Economic Dynamics 9: 143–152. doi:10.1016/j.red.2005.09.001 Basu S. (1996) Procyclical productivity: Increasing returns or cyclical utilization?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 111: 719–751. doi:10.2307/2946670 Basu S., Fernald J.G. (1997) Returns to scale in U.S. production: Estimates and implications. The Journal of Political Economy 105: 249–283. doi:10.1086/262073 Caballero R.J., Jaffe A.B. (2002) How high are the giants’ shoulders: An empirical assessment of knowledge spillovers and creative destruction in a model of economic growth. In: Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M. (eds) Patents, citations and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 89–152 Chu, A. C. (2009). Effects of patent length on R&D: A quantitative DGE analysis. Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica Working Paper. Comin D. (2004) R&D: A small contribution to productivity growth. Journal of Economic Growth 9: 391–421. doi:10.1007/s10887-004-4541-6 Futagami K., Iwaisako T. (2007) Dynamic analysis of patent policy in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Economic Theory 132: 306–334. doi:10.1016/j.jet.2005.07.009 Gallini N.T. (2002) The economics of patents: Lessons from recent U.S. patent reform. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16: 131–154 Gilbert R., Shapiro C. (1990) Optimal patent length and breadth. The Rand Journal of Economics 21: 106–112. doi:10.2307/2555497 Goh A.-T., Olivier J. (2002) Optimal patent protection in a two-sector economy. International Economic Review 43: 1191–1214. doi:10.1111/1468-2354.t01-1-00053 Green J.R., Scotchmer S. (1995) On the division of profit in sequential innovation. The Rand Journal of Economics 26: 20–33. doi:10.2307/2556033 Grossman G.M., Helpman E. (1991) Quality ladders in the theory of growth. The Review of Economic Studies 58: 43–61. doi:10.2307/2298044 Grossman G.M., Lai E. (2004) International protection of intellectual property. The American Economic Review 94: 1635–1653. doi:10.1257/0002828043052312 Guvenen F. (2006) Reconciling conflicting evidence on the elasticity of intertemporal substitution: A macroeconomic perspective. Journal of Monetary Economics 53: 1451–1472. doi:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.06.001 Hall B.H., Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M. (2002) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. In: Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M. (eds) Patents, citations and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. The MIT Press, Cambridege, MA, pp 403–459 Hopenhayn H., Llobet G., Mitchell M. (2006) Rewarding sequential innovators: Prizes, patents, and buyouts. The Journal of Political Economy 114: 1041–1068. doi:10.1086/510562 Hunt, R. M. (1999). Nonobviousness and the incentive to innovate: An economic analysis of intellectual property reform. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper 99-3. Jaffe A.B. (2000) The U.S. patent system in transition: Policy innovation and the innovation process. Research Policy 29: 531–557 Jaffe A.B., Lerner J. (2004) Innovation and its discontents: How our broken system is endangering innovation and progress, and what to do about it. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ Jones C.I. (1995a) Time series tests of endogenous growth models. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 495–525. doi:10.2307/2118448 Jones C.I. (1995b) R&D-based models of economic growth. The Journal of Political Economy 103: 759–784. doi:10.1086/262002 Jones C.I. (1999) Growth: With or without scale effects. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 89: 139–144 Jones C.I., Williams J.C. (1998) Measuring the social return to R&D. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 1119–1135. doi:10.1162/003355398555856 Jones C.I., Williams J.C. (2000) Too much of a good thing? The economics of investment in R&D. Journal of Economic Growth 5: 65–85. doi:10.1023/A:1009826304308 Judd K.L. (1985) On the performance of patents. Econometrica 53: 567–586. doi:10.2307/1911655 Klemperer P. (1990) How broad should the scope of patent protection be?. The Rand Journal of Economics 21: 113–130. doi:10.2307/2555498 Kwan Y.K., Lai E. (2003) Intellectual property rights protection and endogenous economic growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 27: 853–873. doi:10.1016/S0165-1889(02)00018-0 Laitner J. (1982) Monopoly and long-run capital accumulation. The Bell Journal of Economics 13: 143–157. doi:10.2307/3003436 Laitner J., Stolyarov D. (2004) Aggregate returns to scale and embodied technical change: Theory and measurement using stock market data. Journal of Monetary Economics 51: 191–233. doi:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2003.07.001 Lanjouw J.O. (1998) Patent protection in the shadow of infringement: Simulation estimations of patent value. The Review of Economic Studies 65: 671–710. doi:10.1111/1467-937X.00064 Li C.-W. (2001) On the policy implications of endogenous technological progress. The Economic Journal 111: 164–179. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00626 Nordhaus W. (1969) Invention, growth, and welfare: A theoretical treatment of technological change. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA O’Donoghue T. (1998) A patentability requirement for sequential innovation. The Rand Journal of Economics 29: 654–679. doi:10.2307/2556088 O’Donoghue T., Scotchmer S., Thisse J.-F. (1998) Patent breadth, patent life, and the pace of technological progress. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 7: 1–32. doi:10.1162/105864098567317 O’Donoghue T., Zweimuller J. (2004) Patents in a model of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Growth 9: 81–123. doi:10.1023/B:JOEG.0000023017.42109.c2 Romer P.M. (1990) Endogenous technological change. The Journal of Political Economy 98: S71–S102. doi:10.1086/261725 Scotchmer S. (2004) Innovation and incentives. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Segerstrom P.S. (1998) Endogenous growth without scale effects. The American Economic Review 88: 1290–1310 Shapiro, C. (2001). Navigating the patent thicket: Cross licenses, patent pools, and standard setting. In A. Jaffe, J. Lerner, & S. Stern (Eds.), Innovation policy and the economy (Vol. 1, pp. 119–150). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Steger, T. M. (2005). Non-scale models of R&D-based growth: The market solution. Topics in Macroeconomics, 5, article 3. Tandon P. (1982) Optimal patents with compulsory licensing. The Journal of Political Economy 90: 470–486. doi:10.1086/261070 Trimborn T., Koch K.-J., Steger T.M. (2008) Multi-dimensional transitional dynamics: A simple numerical procedure. Macroeconomic Dynamics 12: 301–319. doi:10.1017/S1365100507070034