Effects of an interest-driven creation approach on students’ mobile learning performance and creativity in learning science in a science museum

Adams, P. (2006). Exploring social constructivism: Theories and practicalities. Education, 34(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270600898893. Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545. Arikpo, O. U., & Domike, G. (2015). Pupils learning preferences and interest development in learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(21), 31–38. Atwater, M. M. (1996). Social constructivism: Infusion into the multicultural science education research agenda. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 821–837. Ayas, M. B., & Sak, U. (2014). Objective measure of scientific creativity: Psychometric validity of the creative scientific ability test. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.001. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Chan, T. W., Looi, C. K., Chen, W., Wong, L. H., Chang, B., Liao, C. C., et al. (2018). Interest-driven creator theory: Towards a theory of learning design for Asia in the twenty-first century. Journal of Computers in Education, 5(4), 435–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-018-0122-0. Chen, B., & Bryer, T. (2012). Investigating instructional strategies for using social media in formal and informal learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1027. Cheng, L., & Beal, C. R. (2020). Effects of student-generated drawing and imagination on science text reading in a computer-based learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09684-1. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Collard, P., & Looney, J. (2014). Nurturing creativity in education. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12090. Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2019). From STEM to STEAM: Cracking the code? How creativity & motivation interacts with inquiry-based learning. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641678. Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial. Fergusson, J., Oliver, C., & Walter, M. R. (2012). Astrobiology outreach and the nature of science: The role of creativity. Astrobiology, 12(12), 1143–1153. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2012.0873. Fraser, B. (2002). Learning environments research: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. In G. S. Chiew & K. M. Swe (Eds.), Studies in educational learning environments: An international Perspective (pp. 1–26). Singapore: World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812777133_0001. García, P. C., & Fernandez, T. G. (2018). Makerspaces and scientific creativity level of middle school students. Global Journal of Arts Education, 8(2), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjae.v8i2. Georgiev, G. V., & Casakin, H. (2019). Semantic measures for enhancing creativity in design education. In M. Goudswaard, H. Forbes, L. Kent, C. Snider, & B. Hicks (Eds.), Proceedings of the design society: International conference on engineering design (Vol. 1(1), pp. 369–378). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.40. Gerber, B. L., Cavallo, A. M., & Marek, E. A. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 535–549. Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). The changing role of education and schools. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 1–16). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_1. Guo, J., & Woulfin, S. (2016). Twenty-first century creativity: An investigation of how the partnership for 21st century instructional framework reflects the principles of creativity. Roeper Review, 38(3), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2016.1183741. Hernández-Torrano, D., & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975–2019). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4. Hollanders, H., & Van Cruysen, A. (2009). Design, creativity and innovation: A scoreboard approach. Retrieved 3 May, 2020, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.488.8970&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Hsu, P. L., & Venegas, L. (2018). Activity features of high school students’ science learning in an open-inquiry-based internship programme. International Journal of Science Education, 40(12), 1391–1409. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1479801. Hu, B., & West, A. (2015). Exam-oriented education and implementation of education policy for migrant children in urban China. Educational Studies, 41(3), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2014.977780. Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.002. Kirkpatrick, R., & Zang, Y. (2011). The negative influences exam-oriented education on Chinese high school students: Backwash from classroom to child. Language Testing in Asia, 1(3), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-1-3-36. Knezek, G. A., & Christensen, R. (2019). Space science activities to enhance middle school students’ interest in STEM: Follow-up assessment of disposition retention. In S. Carliner (Ed.), Proceedings of e-learn: World conference on e-learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 971–980). New Orleans, Louisiana: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved May 3, 2020, from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/211179/. Kong, X., Dabney, K. P., & Tai, R. H. (2014). The association between science summer camps and career interest in science and engineering. International Journal of Science Education, 4(1), 54–65. Kong, S. C., & Li, P. (2016). The interest-driven creator theory and coding education. In Gao, D., Wu, Y.-T., Chan, T.-W., Kong, S. C., Lee, M.-H., Yang, J.-C., Shih, J.-L., Hong, J.-C., Shang, J., Cheng, K.-H., & Chen, S. Y. (Eds.), Workshop proceedings of the 20th global Chinese conference on computers in education (pp. 116–119). Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Institute of Education. Lally, P., & Gardner, B. (2013). Promoting habit formation. Health Psychology Review, 7(sup1), S137–S158. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2011.603640. Lille, B., & Romero, M. (2017). Creativity assessment in the context of maker-based projects. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 22(3), 32–47. Lin, P. Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2016). The dimensions and impact of informal science learning experiences on middle schoolers’ attitudes and abilities in science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(17), 2551–2572. Liu, C. C., Chen, W. C., Lin, H. M., & Huang, Y. Y. (2017). A remix-oriented approach to promoting student engagement in a long-term participatory learning program. Computers & Education, 110, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.002. Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75. Malik, M. A. R., Choi, J. N., & Butt, A. N. (2019). Distinct effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic rewards on radical and incremental creativity: The moderating role of goal orientations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(9–10), 1013–1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2403. Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into Practice, 41, 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4. Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., & Vom Hofe, R. (2013). Predicting long-term growth in students’ mathematics achievement: The unique contributions of motivation and cognitive strategies. Child Development, 84(4), 1475–1490. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12036. Resnick, M. (1996). Distributed constructionism. International Society of the Learning Sciences. Retrieved May 3, 2020, from https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1161135.1161173. Rosli, R., Abdullah, M., Siregar, N. C., Hamid, N. S. A., Abdullah, S., Beng, G. K., et al. (2019). Exploring Space Science through the UKM-SIDn Outreach Program. IEEE. Retrieved May 3, 2020, from https://doi.org/10.1109/IconSpace.2019.8905957. Runco, M. A., & McGarva, D. J. (2013). Creativity and motivation. In S. Kreitler (Ed.), Cognition and motivation: Forging and interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 468–482). New York: Cambridge University Press. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020. Sandifer, C. (2003). Technological novelty and open-endedness: Two characteristics of interactive exhibits that contribute to the holding of visitor attention in a science museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10068. Sawyer, R. K., Csikszentmihalyi, M., John-Steiner, V., Moran, S., Feldman, D. H., Gardner, H., et al. (2003). Creativity and development. New York: Oxford University Press. Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 197–222). New York: Routledge. Schulz, K. P., Geithner, S., Woelfel, C., & Krzywinski, J. (2015). Toolkit-based modelling and serious play as means to foster creativity in innovation processes. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(2), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12113. Shaby, N., Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Tal, T. (2017). The particular aspects of science museum exhibits that encourage students’ engagement. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(3), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9676-7. Shaby, N., Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., & Tal, T. (2019). An examination of the interactions between museum educators and students on a school visit to science museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(2), 211–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21476. Shaby, N., & Vedder-Weiss, D. (2020). Science identity trajectories throughout school visits to a science museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(5), 733–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21608. Sher, K. B. T., Levi-Keren, M., & Gordon, G. (2019). Priming, enabling and assessment of curiosity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 931–952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09665-4. Soh, K. (2017). Fostering student creativity through teacher behaviors. Thinking skills and creativity, 23, 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.002. Starko, A. J. (1995). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight. New York: Longman Publishers USA. Sternberg, R. J. (2006a). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98. Sternberg, R. J. (2006b). Creating a vision of creativity: The first 25 years. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, S(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.S.1.2. Tan, C. (2016). Tensions and challenges in China’s education policy borrowing. Educational Research, 58(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2016.1165551. Tan, L., Lee, S., Ponnusamy, L., Koh, E., & Tan, K. (2016). Fostering creativity in the classroom for high ability students: Context does matter. Education Sciences, 6(4), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6040036. Tarde, G., & Baldwin, J. M. (2019). Imitation and creativity. In V. P. Glaveanu (Ed.), The creativity reader (pp. 173–189). New York: Oxford University Press. Tu, Y. F., & Hwang, G. J. (2018a). Trends of library-associated mobile learning based on a review of academic studies published from 2007 to 2016. The Electronic Library, 36(5), 875–891. Tu, Y. F., & Hwang, G. J. (2018b). The roles of sensing technologies and learning strategies in library-associated mobile learning: A review of 2007-2016 journal publications. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 12(1), 42–54. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In N. Gauvain & M. Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (pp. 29–36). New York: W.H. Freeman and Company. Wang, H. Y., Liu, G. Z., & Hwang, G. J. (2017). Integrating socio-cultural contexts and location-based systems for ubiquitous language learning in museums: A state of the art review of 2009–2014. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 653–671. Williams, F. E. (1979). Assessing creativity across Williams” cube” model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 23(4), 748–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698627902300406. Winston, A. S., & Baker, J. E. (1985). Behavior analytic studies of creativity: A critical review. The Behavior Analyst, 8(Fall (2)), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393151. Wong, L. H., Chan, T. W., Chen, Z. H., King, R. B., & Wong, S. L. (2015). The IDC theory: Interest and the interest loop. In T. Kojiri, T. Supnithi, Y. Wang, Y.-T. Wu, H. Ogata, W. Chen, S. C. Kong, & F. Qiu (Eds.). Workshop proceedings of the 23rd international conference on computers in education (pp. 804–813). Hangzhou: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. Yeh, Y. C., Rega, E. M., & Chen, S. Y. (2019). Enhancing creativity through aesthetics-integrated computer-based training: The effectiveness of a FACE approach and exploration of moderators. Computers & Education, 139, 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.007. Yoon, H. J., Sung, S. Y., Choi, J. N., Lee, K., & Kim, S. (2015). Tangible and intangible rewards and employee creativity: The mediating role of situational extrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.1088283. Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.545713. Zhang, Y. (1999). The blind leading the blind? Using learner-authored texts to foster conceptual change in college EFL learners. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED474688.pdf.