Effects of Terms of Trade and its Volatility on Economic Growth: A Cross Country Empirical Investigation

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 18 - Trang 217-229 - 2011
Syed Tehseen Jawaid1, Abdul Waheed2
1Iqra University, Karachi, Pakistan
2Department of Economics, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan

Tóm tắt

This study examines the effects of terms of trade and its volatility on economic growth for a sample of 94 developed and developing countries, using 5 year average annual data from 2004 to 2008. The cross country ordinary least square estimation results indicate significant positive effect of terms of trade on economic growth. Furthermore, volatility of terms of trade has significant positive effect on economic growth. To test the robustness of initial results, sensitivity analysis has been performed using different additional variables, sample size and various proxies of volatility variable. The initial results were found robust despite the inclusion of various variables in the basic model and use of various proxies for volatility of terms of trade.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adeniyi OM, Abiodun LN (2011) Health expenditure and Nigerian economic growth. Eur J Econ Finance Adm Sci (30):125–129 Arize A (1996) Cointegration test of a long-run relation between the trade balance and the terms of trade in sixteen countries. N Am J Econ Financ 7:203–215 Barro RJ (1996) Determinants of economic growth: a cross-country empirical study. NBER Working Paper 5698 Blattman C, Hwang J, Williamson JG (2003) The terms of trade and economic growth in the periphery 1870–1983. National Bureau Economic Research, Working Paper 9940 Bleaney M, Greenaway D (2001) The impact of terms of trade and real exchange rate volatility on investment and growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Dev Econ 65:491–500 Bouakez H, Kano T (2008) Terms of trade and current account fluctuations: the Harberger–Laursen–Metzler effect revisited. J Macroecon 30:260–281 Cashin P, McDermott CJ (2002a) The long-run behaviour of commodity prices: small trends and big variability. Int Mone’t Fund Staff Pap 49(2):175–199 Cashin P, McDermott CJ (2002b) Terms of trade shock and the current account: evidence from five industrial countries. Open Econ Rev 13:219–235 Edwards JA (2007) Dynamics of cross country growth/volatility relationship. Glob Econ J 7(2):1–18 Fatima N (2010) Analysis of terms of trade effect for Pakistan, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics. Working Paper 2010:59 Goel RK, Ram R (2001) Irreversibility of R&D investment and the adverse effect of uncertainty: evidence from the OECD countries. Econ Lett 71:287–291 Hadass YS, Williamson JG (2001) Terms of trade shocks and economic performance, 1870–1940: Prebisch and Singer revisited. National Bureau Economic Research, Working Paper 8188 Hamori S (2008) Trade balances and the terms of trade in G-7 countries: penal cointegration approach. Appl Econo Int Dev 8(2):13–22 Harberger AC (1950) Currency depreciation, income and the balance of trade. J Polit Econ 58(1):47–60 Laursen S, Metzler LA (1950) Flexible exchange rates and the theory of employment. Rev Econ Stat 32:281–299 Levine R, Renelt RD (1992) A sensitivity analysis of cross country growth regression. Am Econ Rev 82(4):942–963 Lutz M (1999) A general test of the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis. Rev Dev Econ 3(1):44–57 Mendoza EG (1997) Terms-of-trade uncertainty and economic growth. J Dev Econ 54:323–356 Misztal P (2010) The Harberger–Laursen–Metzler effect. Theory and practice in Poland. Rom Econ J XIII(38):129–146 Otto G (2003) Terms of trade shocks and the balance of trade: there is a Harberger–Laursen–Metzler effect. J Int Money Financ 22:155–184 Prebisch R (1950) The economic development of Latin American and its principal problems (Lake Success, NY: United Nations, Department of Economic Affairs). Reprinted in Economic Bulletin for Latin America 7(1962):1–22 Salvatore D (2004) International economics, 4th edn. McGraw Hill, New York Singer HW (1950) The distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. Am Econ Rev 40:473–485 Stastny M, Zagler M (2007) Empirical evidence on growth and volatility. EUI Working Paper 2007/22 Tsen WH (2009) Terms-of-trade and trade balance: some empirical evidence of Asian economies. Int Trade J 23(4):422–457 Wong HT (2004) Terms of trade and economic growth in Malaysia. Labuan Bull Int Bus Financ 2(2):105–122 Wong HT (2010) Terms of trade and economic growth in Japan and Korea: an empirical analysis. Empir Econ 38:139–158 World Development Indicator (various years) Web Link: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators Yanikkaya H (2003) Trade openness and economic growth: a cross-country empirical investigation. J Dev Econ 72:57–89