Effects of State-Level Abortion and LGBT Laws and Policies on Interstate Migration Attitudes
Tóm tắt
There have been major shifts at the state level in social and legal rights available to women and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (“LGBT”) individuals. Variation in policies across states has resulted in a patchwork of rights for these groups. In this study, we examine the effects of state-level policies on migration attitudes, including restrictions on abortion, gender-affirming medical care, transgender individuals’ access to sports in schools, discussions about gender and sexuality in schools, same-sex marriage, and employment discrimination based on sexual orientation. Drawing on survey data from 1061 participants, we pay particular attention to how state-level political context and sociodemographic factors shape desire to move to a state with newly restrictive gender and sexuality policies. Results indicate that restrictive state policies on abortion and LGBT issues serve as both push and pull factors affecting desire to move to a state. Although political orientation provides the greatest explanatory power for migration attitudes, the majority of survey respondents across political orientations reported that these policies either made them less likely to want to move to a state or did not affect their desires. Further, state-level political climate, gender, sexual orientation, race, parenthood status, income, and willingness to migrate for work, political climate, or education were related to migration attitudes. Findings suggest that states enacting these policies could experience economic effects due to a decline in migration, particularly for those seeking employment opportunities or pursuits of higher education. In addition, states could see a decline in migration from women and LGBT individuals, and their allies.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abraham, M., Bähr, S., & Trappmann, M. (2019). Gender differences in willingness to move for interregional job offers. Demographic Research, 40, 1537–1602. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2019.40.53
Abril, D., & DeVynk, G. (2021). Tech workers are marking Texas off the list of places they’d consider working after the state passed the nation’s most restrictive abortion law. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/09/12/texas-abortion-law-tech-workers-reconsidering-relocation/
Adamczyk, A., Boyd, K. A., & Hayes, B. E. (2016). Place matters: Contextualizing the roles of religion and race for understanding Americans’ attitudes about homosexuality. Social Science Research, 57, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.02.001
Baden, K. & Driver, J. (2023). The state abortion policy landscape one year post-Roe. Guttmacher Institute. https://www.guttmacher.org/2023/06/state-abortion-policy-landscape-one-year-post-roe
Barringer, M. N., Sumerau, J. E., & Gay, D. A. (2020). Generational variation in young adults’ attitudes toward legal abortion: Contextualizing the role of religion. Social Currents, 7(3), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329496520905020
Baumle, A. K., Compton, D., & Poston, D. L., Jr. (2009). Same-sex partners: The social demography of sexual orientation. State University of New York Press.
Beaudin, L. (2017). Marriage equality and interstate migration. Applied Economics, 49(30), 2956–2973. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1251565
Black, D., Gates, G., Sanders, S., & Taylor, L. (2002). Why do gay men live in San Francisco? Journal of Urban Economics, 51(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.2001.2237
Branigin, A., & Kirkpatrick, N. (2022). Anti-transgender laws are on the rise. Here’s a look at where—and what kind. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2022/10/14/anti-trans-bills/
Burke, K., Kazyak, E., Oliver, M., & Valkr, P. (2023). LG but not T: Opposition to transgender rights amidst gay and lesbian acceptance. The Sociological Quarterly, 64(3), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2023.2167673
Butler, J. (1991). Imitation and gender insubordination. In D. Fuss (Ed.), Inside/out: Lesbian theories, gay theories (pp. 13–31). Routledge.
Carlisle, M. (2022). Fetal personhood laws are a new frontier in the battle over reproductive rights. Time.
Chen, D. W. (2023). A new goal for abortion bills: Punish or protect doctors. The New York Times.
Compton, D. R., & Baumle, A. K. (2012). Beyond the Castro: The role of demographics in the selection of gay and lesbian enclaves. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(10), 1327–1356. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2012.724633
Cramer, R. J., Miller, A. K., Amacker, A. M., & Burks, A. C. (2013). Openness, right-wing authoritarianism, and antigay prejudice in college students: A mediational model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(1), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031090
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
Davern, M., Bautista, R., Freese, J., Morgan, S. L., & Smith, T. W. (2021). General Social Surveys, 1972–2021 [Machine-readable data file]. National Opinion Research Center (NORC), University of Chicago. Retrieved August 23, 2023 from https://gssdataexplorer.norc.org/
Dawson, L., Kates, J., & Musumeci, M. (2022). Youth access to gender affirming care: The federal and state policy landscape. Kaiser Family Foundation.
De Zordo, S., Mishtal, J., Zanini, G., & Gerdts, C. (2020). Consequences of gestational age limits for people needing abortion care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 28(1), 1818377. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2020.1818377
Dush, C. K., Manning, W., & Van Riper, D. (2023). IPUMS Contextual determinants of health: Version 1.0. IPUMS. https://doi.org/10.18128/D130.V1.0
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, 597 U.S. (2022).
Elliott, S. (2010). Parents’ constructions of teen sexuality: Sex panics, contradictory discourses, and social inequality. Symbolic Interaction, 33(2), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2010.33.2.191
Everett, B. G., Hatzenbuehler, M. L., & Hughes, T. L. (2016). The impact of civil union legislation on minority stress, depression, and hazardous drinking in a diverse sample of sexual-minority women: A quasi-natural experiment. Social Science & Medicine, 169, 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.09.036
Everett, B. G., Limburg, A., Homan, P., & Philbin, M. M. (2022). Structural heteropatriarchy and birth outcomes in the United States. Demography, 59(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-9606030
Goldberg, A. (2022). How overturning ‘Roe’ affects college students from anti-abortion states. Rewire News Group.
Guttmacher Institute. (2023). An overview of abortion laws. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-abortion-laws
Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2017). The influence of state laws on the mental health of sexual minority youth. JAMA Pediatrics, 171(4), 322–324. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.4732
Henry, P. J., Steiger, R. L., & Bellovary, A. (2022). The contribution of gender equality to the coexistence of progressive abortion and sexual orientation laws. Sex Roles, 86(3–4), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01263-0
Hernandez, S. M., & Sparks, P. J. (2020). Barriers to health care among adults with minoritized identities in the United States, 2013–2017. American Journal of Public Health, 110(6), 857–862. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305598
Homan, P. (2019). Structural sexism and health in the United States: A new perspective on health inequality and the gender system. American Sociological Review, 84(3), 486–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419848723
Human Rights Campaign. (2023). Impact of gender affirming care bans on LGBTQ+ adults. https://hrc-prod-requests.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/GAC-Ban-Memo-Final.pdf
Ingraham, C. (1994). The heterosexual imaginary: Feminist sociology and theories of gender. Sociological Theory, 12(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.2307/201865
Jones, J. M. (2022). LGBT identification in U.S. ticks up to 71%. Gallup News.
Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93(2), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.136
Kennedy, H. R., & Dalla, R. L. (2020). “It may be legal, but it is not treated equally”: Marriage equality and well-being implications for same-sex couples. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 32(1), 67–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538720.2019.1681340
Lee, E. S. (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2060063
Loll, D., & Hall, K. S. (2019). Differences in abortion attitudes by policy context and between men and women in the World Values Survey. Women & Health, 59(5), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2018.1508539
Long, L. (1988). Migration and residential mobility. Russell Sage.
Long, L. (1992). Changing residence: Comparative perspectives on its relationship to age, sex, and marital status. Population Studies, 46(1), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000146056
MacKinnon, C. A. (1991). Towards a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press.
Marcén, M., & Morales, M. (2022). The effect of same-sex marriage legalization on interstate migration in the USA. Journal of Population Economics, 35(2), 441–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-021-00842-5
Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
Miller, A. K. (2021). A dilemma of dogma: Specifying the personality root of sexual prejudice. Journal of Homosexuality, 68(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2019.1624454
Miller, A. K., Markman, K. D., Amacker, A. M., & Menaker, T. A. (2012a). Expressed sexual assault legal context and victim culpability attributions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(6), 1023–1039. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511424493
Miller, A. K., Markman, K. D., Wagner, M. M., & Hunt, A. N. (2013). Mental simulation and sexual prejudice reduction: The debiasing role of counterfactual thinking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(1), 190–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00992.x
Miller, A. K., Wagner, M. M., & Hunt, A. N. (2012b). Parsimony in personality: Predicting sexual prejudice. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2012.638550
Miller, R. A., Vaccaro, A., Kimball, E. W., & Forester, R. (2021). “It’s dude culture”: Students with minoritized identities of sexuality and/or gender navigating STEM majors. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(3), 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000171
Molloy, R., Smith, C. L., & Wozniak, A. (2011). Internal migration in the United States. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(3), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.25.3.173
Movement Advancement Project. (n.d.). Equality maps snapshot: LGBTQ equality by state. https://www.mapresearch.org/equality-maps/
National Center for Health Statistics. (2021). National Survey of Family Growth, 2011–2019. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [Distributor]. Retrieved August 23, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38009.v1
Parnes, J. E., Smith, J. K., & Conner, B. T. (2018). Reefer madness or much ado about nothing? Cannabis legalization outcomes among young adults in the United States. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 56, 116–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.03.011
Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
Peer, E., Rothschild, D., Gordon, A., Evernden, Z., & Damer, E. (2022). Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behavior Research Methods, 54(4), 1643–1662. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01694-3
Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs, 5(4), 631–660. https://doi.org/10.1086/493756
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
Rubin, J. (2023). Access to abortion is a unifying issue. The Washington Post.
Tolnay, S. (2003). The African American “Great Migration” and beyond. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100009
Twenge, J. M., & Blake, A. B. (2021). Increased support for same-sex marriage in the US: Disentangling age, period, and cohort effects. Journal of Homosexuality, 68(11), 1774–1784. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2019.1705672
Ueno, K., Vaghela, P., & Ritter, L. J. (2014). Sexual orientation, internal migration, and mental health during the transition to adulthood. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 55(4), 461–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146514556509
United States Census Bureau. (2022). Household Pulse Survey. Retrieved August 23, 2023 from https://www.census.gov/data/experimental-data-products/household-pulse-survey.html
Walther, C. S., & Jr, P. D. L. (2004). Patterns of gay and lesbian partnering in the larger metropolitan areas of the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 41(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490409552228
Watson, R. J., Fish, J. N., Menary, W., Caba, A., Cunningham, C., & Eaton, L. A. (2021). LGBTQ state policies: A lever for reducing SGM youth substance use and bullying. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 221, 108659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108659
Westbrook, L., & Schilt, K. (2014). Doing gender, determining gender: Transgender people, gender panics, and the maintenance of the sex/gender/sexuality system. Gender & Society, 28(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243213503203
Westbrook, L., & Schilt, K. (2016). Penis panics: Biological maleness, social masculinity, and the matrix of perceived sexual threat. In C. J. Pascoe & T. Bridges (Eds.), Exploring masculinities: Identity, inequality, continuity, and change (pp. 382–393). Oxford University Press.