Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression on ACC Amplitude and Listener Performance

Ear and Hearing - Tập 36 Số 5 - Trang e261-e270 - 2015
Benjamin J. Kirby1, Carolyn Brown2,3
1Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE
2Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
3Department of Otolaryngology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson, 2011, S., Nelson D. A., Kreft H., et al. Comparing spatial tuning curves, spectral ripple resolution, and speech perception in cochlear implant users., J Acoust Soc Am, 130, 364, 10.1121/1.3589255

Alexander, 2013, M.. Individual variability in recognition of frequency-lowered speech., Semin Hear, 34, 86, 10.1055/s-0033-1341346

Billings, 2011, J., Tremblay K. L., Miller C. W.. Aided cortical auditory evoked potentials in response to changes in hearing aid gain., Int J Audiol, 50, 459, 10.3109/14992027.2011.568011

Chang, 2012, W., Dillon H., Carter L., et al. The relationship between cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) detection and estimated audibility in infants with sensorineural hearing loss., Int J Audiol, 51, 663, 10.3109/14992027.2012.690076

Ellis, 2013, J., Munro K. J.., Does cognitive function predict frequency compressed speech recognition in listeners with normal hearing and normal cognition Int J Audiol, 52, 14

Gorga, 1985, P., Worthington D. W., Reiland J. K., et al. Some comparisons between auditory brain stem response thresholds, latencies, and the pure-tone audiogram., Ear Hear, 6, 105, 10.1097/00003446-198503000-00008

Gorga, 1987, P., Beauchaine K. A., Reiland J. K.. Comparison of onset and steady-state responses of hearing aids: Implications for use of the auditory brainstem response in the selection of hearing aids., J Speech Hear Res, 30, 130, 10.1044/jshr.3001.130

Gorga, 2006, P., Johnson T. A., Kaminski J. R., et al. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds., Ear Hear, 27, 60, 10.1097/01.aud.0000194511.14740.9c

Henry, 2005, A., Turner C. W., Behrens A.. Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: Normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners., J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 1111, 10.1121/1.1944567

Herdman, 2001, T., Stapells D. R.. Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects., Scand Audiol, 30, 41, 10.1080/010503901750069563

Leek, 1987, R., Dorman M. F., Summerfield Q.. Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners., J Acoust Soc Am, 81, 148, 10.1121/1.395024

Levitt, 1971, C. C. H.. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics., J Acoust Soc Am, 49, 467, 10.1121/1.1912375

Martin, 2000, A., Boothroyd A.. Cortical, auditory, evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude., J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 2155, 10.1121/1.428556

McCreery, 2014, W., Alexander J., Brennan M. A., et al. The influence of audibility on speech recognition with nonlinear frequency compression for children and adults with hearing loss., Ear Hear, 35, 440, 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000027

Ostroff, 1998, M., Martin B. A., Boothroyd A.. Cortical evoked response to acoustic change within a syllable., Ear Hear, 19, 290, 10.1097/00003446-199808000-00004

Perreau, 2013, E., Bentler R. A., Tyler R. S.. The contribution of a frequency-compression hearing aid to contralateral cochlear implant performance., J Am Acad Audiol, 24, 105, 10.3766/jaaa.24.2.4

Sherbecoe, 2004, L., Studebaker G. A.. Supplementary formulas and tables for calculating and interconverting speech recognition scores in transformed arcsine units., Int J Audiol, 43, 442, 10.1080/14992020400050056

Sininger, 1997, S., Abdala C., Cone-Wesson B.. Auditory threshold sensitivity of the human neonate as measured by the auditory brainstem response., Hear Res, 104, 27, 10.1016/S0378-5955(96)00178-5

Stapells, 2000, R.. Threshold estimation by the tone-evoked auditory brainstem response: A literature meta-analysis., J Speech Lang Hear Res, 24, 74

Stapells, 1997, R., Oates P.. Estimation of the pure-tone audiogram by the auditory brainstem response: A review., Audiol Neurootol, 2, 257, 10.1159/000259252

Stueve, 2003, P., ORourke C.. Estimation of hearing loss in children: Comparison of auditory steady-state response, auditory brainstem response, and behavioral test methods., Am J Audiol, 12, 125, 10.1044/1059-0889(2003/020)

Turner, 1995, W., Souza P. E., Forget L. N.. Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners., J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 2568, 10.1121/1.411911

Won, 2011, H., Clinard C. G., Kwon S., et al. Relationship between behavioral and physiological spectral-ripple discrimination., J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 12, 375, 10.1007/s10162-011-0257-4