Effects of Differential Reinforcement and Rules With Feedback on Preference for Choice and Verbal Reports

Ayllon, T., & Azrin, N. H. (1964). Rein-forcement and instructions with mental patients. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7, 327–331. doi:10. 1901/jeab.1964.7–327

Baron, A., & Galizio, M. (1983). Instructional control of human operant behavior. The Psychological Record, 33, 495–520.

Baron, A., Kaufman, A., & Stauber, K. A. (1969). Effects of instruction and reinforcement-feedback on human operant behavior maintained by fixed-interval reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 701–712. doi:10.1901/jeab.1969.12–701

Baron, A., & Perone, M. (1982). The place of the human subject in the operant laboratory. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 143–158.

Baron, A., Perone, M., & Galizio, M. (1991). Analyzing the reinforcement process at the human level: Can application and behavioristic interpretation replace laboratory research? The Behavior Analyst, 14, 95–105.

Bernstein, B. J. (1988). Laboratory lore and research practices in the experimental analysis of human behavior: Designing session logistics—How long, how often, how many? The Behavior Analyst, 11, 51–58.

Bicard, D. F., & Neef, N. A. (2002). Effects of strategic versus tactical instructions on adaption to changing contingencies in children with ADHD. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 375–389. doi:10. 1901/jaba.2002.35-375

Catania, A. C. (1975). Freedom and knowledge: An experimental analysis of preference in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 24, 89–106. doi:10.1901/jeab.1975.24-89

Catania, A. C., & Cutts, D. (1963). Experimental control of superstitious responding in humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 203–208. doi:10. 1901/jeab.1963.6-203

Catania, A. C., Matthews, B. A., & Shimoff, E. (1982). Instructed versus shaped human verbal behavior: Interactions with nonverbal responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38, 233–248. doi:10.1901/jeab.1982.38-233

Catania, A. C., & Sagvolden, T. (1980). Preference for free choice over forced choice in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34, 77–86. doi:10.1901/jeab.1980.34-77

Cerutti, D. T. (1991). Discriminative versus reinforcing properties of schedules as determinants of schedule insensitivity in humans. The Psychological Record, 41, 51–67.

Dixon, M. R. (2000). Manipulating the illusion of control: Variations in gambling as a function of perceived control over chance outcomes. The Psychological Record, 50, 705–719.

Fisher, W. W., Thompson, R. H., Piazza, C. C., Crosland, K., & Gotjen, D. (1997). On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 423–438. doi:10.1901/jaba.1997.30-423

Galizio, M. (1979). Contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior: Instructional control of human loss avoidance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31, 53–70. doi:10.1901/jeab.1979.31-53

Hackenberg, T. D., & Joker, V. R. (1994). Instructional versus schedule control of humans’ choices in situations of diminishing returns. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 367–383. doi:10.1901/jeab.1994.62–367

Hanley, G. P., Piazza, C. C., Fisher, W. W., Contrucci, S. A., & Maglieri, K. M. (1997). Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 459–473. doi:10.1901/jaba.1997.30-459

Hayes, S. C., Brownstein, A. J., Zettle, R. D., Rosenfarb, I., & Korn, Z. (1986). Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 237–256. doi:10.1901/jeab. 1986.45-237

Hefferline, R. F., Keenan, B., & Harford, R. A. (1959). Escape and avoidance in human subjects without their observation of the response. Science, 130, 1338–1339. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org /stable/1756871

Home, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1993). Determinants of human performance on concurrent schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 29–60. doi: 10.1901/jeab. 1993.59-29

Joyce, J. J., & Chase, P. N. (1990). Effects of response variability on the sensitivity of rule-governed behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 251–262. doi: 10.1901/jeab. 1990.54-251

Karsina, A., Thompson, R. H., & Rodriguez, N. M. (2011). Effects of a history of differential reinforcement on preference for choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 95, 189–202. doi: 10. 1901/jeab.2011.95-189

Kaufman, A., Baron, A., & Kopp, R. E. (1966). Some effects of instructions on human operant behavior. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 1, 243–250.

Lerman, D. C., Iwata, B. A., Rainville, B., Adelinis, J. D., Crosland, K., & Kogan, J. (1997). Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 411–422. doi: 10. 1901/jaba.1997.30-411

Lippman, L. G., & Meyer, M. E. (1967). Fixed-interval performance as related to instructions and to subjects’ verbalizations of the contingency. Psychonomic Science, 8, 135–136.

Luczynksi, K. C., & Hanley, G. P. (2009). Do children prefer contingencies? An evaluation of the efficacy of and preference for contingent versus noncontingent social reinforcement during play. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 511–525. doi:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-511

Luczynksi, K. C., & Hanley, G. P. (2010). Examining the generality of children’s preference for contingent reinforcement via extension to different responses, reinforcers, and schedules. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 397–409. doi:10.1901/jaba.2010.43-397

Matthews, B. A., Shimoff, E., Catania, A. C., & Sagvolden, T. (1977). Uninstructed human responding: Sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 453–467. doi: 10.1901/jeab. 1977.27-453

Mazur, J. E. (1996). Past experience, recency, and spontaneous recovery in choice behavior. Animal Learning & Behavior, 24, 1–10.

Neuringer, A. J. (1969). Animals respond for food in the presence of free food. Science, 166, 399–401.

Rosenfarb, I. S., Newland, M. C., Brannon, S. E., & Howey, D. S. (1992). Effects of self-generated rules on the development of schedule-controlled behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 58, 107–121. doi:10.1901/jeab.1992.58-107

Schmidt, A. C., Hanley, G. P., & Layer, S. A. (2009). A further analysis of the value of choice: Controlling for illusory discriminative stimuli and evaluating the effects of less preferred items. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 711–716. doi: 10. 1901/jaba.2009.42-711

Schwartz, I. S., & Baer, D. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 189–204. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-189

Shimoff, E. (1986). Post-session verbal reports and the experimental analysis of behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 4, 19–22.

Shimoff, E., Catania, A. C., & Matthews, B. A. (1981). Uninstructedhuman responding: Sensitivity of low-rate performance to schedule contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 26, 207–220. doi: 10.1901/jeab. 1981.26-207

Thompson, R. H., Fisher, W. W., & Contrucci, S. A. (1998). Evaluating the reinforcing effects of choice in comparison to reinforcement rate. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 12, 181–188. doi:10891-4222/98

Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Hernandez, E. (2006). An evaluation of the value of choice with preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 1–16. doi:10.1901/jaba.2006.39-16

Torgurd, L. J., & Holborn, S. W. (1990). The effects of verbal performance descriptions on nonverbal operant responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 273–291. doi:10.1901/jeab.1990.54-273

Voss, S. C., & Homzie, M. J. (1970). Choice as a value. Psychological Reports, 26, 912–914.

Weiner, H. (1970). Instructional control of human operant responding during extinction following fixed-ratio conditioning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 391–394. doi:10.1901/jeab. 1970.13-391