Effectiviteit van Triple P in Nederland: stand van zaken en controverse

Renske Schappin1, I.M. de Graaf2, S.A. Reijneveld3
1Afdeling Medische Psychologie en Maatschappelijk Werk, Wilhelmina Kinderziekenhuis, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Nederland
2Programma Zorginnovatie, Trimbos-instituut, Utrecht, Nederland
3Afdeling Gezondheidswetenschappen, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Universiteit Groningen, Groningen, Nederland

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Coyne, J. (2012). “Strong evidence” for a treatment evaporates with a closer look: Many psychotherapies are similarly vulnerable. http://blogs.plos.org/mindthebrain/2012/11/26/strong-evidence-for-a-treatment-evaporates-with-a-closer-look-many-psychotherapies-are-similarly-vulnerable/ (Gecreëerd: November 26).

Coyne, J. (2014). Are meta-analyses done by promoters of psychological treatments as tainted as those done by Pharma? http://blogs.plos.org/mindthebrain/2014/05/20/meta-analyses-done-promoters-psychological-treatments-tainted-meta-analyses-done-pharma/ (Gecreëerd: May 20).

Coyne, J. (2015). BMC Medicine gets caught up in Triple P Parenting promoter’s war on critics and null findings. http://blogs.plos.org/mindthebrain/2015/03/16/bmc-medicine-gets-caught-up-in-triple-p-parenting-promoters-war-on-critics-and-null-findings/ (Gecreëerd: March 16).

Coyne, J., & Kwakkenbos, L. (2013). Triple P‑Positive Parenting programs: the folly of basing social policy on underpowered flawed studies. BMC Medicine, 11, 11.

Eisner, M., Humphreys, D.K., Wilson, P., & Gardner, F. (2015). Disclosure of financial conflicts of interests in interventions to improve child psychosocial health: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 10, e0142803.

Gerards, S.M., Dagnelie, P.C., Gubbels, J.S., Van Buuren, S., Hamers, F.J., Jansen, M.W., & Kremers, S.P. (2015). The effectiveness of lifestyle triple P in the Netherlands: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE, 10, e0122240.

Graaf, I. de, Bohlmeijer, E., Blokland, G., & Tavecchio, L. (2009a). Helping Families Change. The adoptation of the Triple P – Positive Parenting Program in the Netherlands. Chapter 5: What are the results of Group and Standard Triple P for parents and children in the Dutch mental health care and youth care? (PhD). Utrecht: University of Amsterdam.

Graaf, I. de, Onrust, S., Haverman, M., & Janssens, J. (2009b). Helping families improve: An evaluation of two primary care approaches to parenting support in the Netherlands. Infant and Child Development, 18, 481–501.

Graaf, I. de, Schulten, I., & Verdurmen, J. (2011). Basiszorg Triple P voor ouders van tieners. Evaluatie van de implementatie en eerste effecten van Basiszorg Triple P. Utrecht: Trimbos-instituut.

Kleefman, M., Jansen, D. E., Stewart, R. E., & Reijneveld, S. A. (2014). The effectiveness of stepping stones triple P parenting support in parents of children with borderline to mild intellectual disability and psychosocial problems: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Medicine, 12, 191.

Nederlands Jeugdinstituut (2015). Positief Opvoeden, Triple P. www.triplep-nederland.nl. Geraadpleegd op: 14-12-2015.

Onrust, S.A., Graaf, I.M. de, & Linden, D. van der (2012). De meerwaarde van Triple P. Resultaten van een gerandomiseerde effectstudie van de Triple P gezinsinterventie bij gezinnen met meervoudige problematiek. Kind en Adolescent, 33, 60–74.

Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process. Castalia: Eugene, OR.

Reijneveld, S.A. (2015). Evidence on the effectiveness of public health practice: How should we proceed? European Journal of Public Health, 25, 752–753.

Reijneveld, S.A., Kleefman, M., & Jansen, D. E. (2015). Stepping Stones Triple P: The importance of putting the findings into context – a response to Tellegen and Sofronoff. BMC Medicine, 13, 36.

Sanders, M.R. (2012). Development, evaluation, and multinational dissemination of the triple P‑positive parenting program. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 345–379.

Sanders, M. R., Kirby, J. N., Tellegen, C. L., & Day, J. J. (2014). The triple P‑positive parenting program: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a multi-level system of parenting support. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 337–357.

Sanders, M. R., Markie-Dadds, C., & Turner, K. M. T. (2003). Theoretical, scientific and clinical foundations of the triple P‑positive parenting program: A population approach to the promotion of parenting competence. Parenting Research and Practice Monograph, 1, 1–24.

Schappin, R., Wijnroks, L., Uniken Venema, M., Wijnberg-Williams, B., Veenstra, R., Koopman-Esseboom, C., & Jongmans, M. (2013). Brief parenting intervention for parents of NICU graduates: A randomized, clinical trial of primary care triple P. BMC Pediatrics, 13, 69.

Schappin, R., Wijnroks, L., Uniken Venema, M., Wijnberg-Williams, B., Veenstra, R., Koopman-Esseboom, C., & Jongmans, M. (2014). Primary care triple P for parents of NICU graduates with behavioral problems: A randomized, clinical trial using observations of parent-child interaction. BMC Pediatrics, 14, 305.

Spijkers, W., Jansen, D. E., & Reijneveld, S. A. (2013). Effectiveness of primary care triple P on child psychosocial problems in preventive child healthcare: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Medicine, 11, 240.

Tellegen, C. L., & Sanders, M. R. (2013). Stepping stones triple P‑positive parenting program for children with disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 1556–1571.

Wilson, P., Rush, R., Hussey, S., Puckering, C., Sim, F., Allely, C. S., & Gillberg, C. (2012). How evidence-based is an ‘evidence-based parenting program’? A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of Triple P. BMC Medicine, 10, 130.