Effectiveness of intervention on behaviour change against use of non-biodegradable plastic bags: a systematic review

Discover Sustainability - Tập 2 Số 1 - 2021
Gbadebo Collins Adeyanju1, Teslin Maria Augustine2, Stefan Volkmann2, Usman Adetunji Oyebamiji2, Sonia Ran2, Oluyomi A. Osobajo3, Afolabi Otitoju4
1Centre for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioural Science (CEREB), University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
2Willy Brandt School of Public Policy, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
3Aberdeen Business School, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
4Africa Partners Initiative E.V. (API), Erfurt, Germany

Tóm tắt

AbstractThe devastating impacts that bio-degradable products such as plastic bags are having on human health, wildlife, and the environment is enormous, especially single-use once. Single-use plastics are non-biodegradable products and does not undergo biological decomposition nor degenerate. This review examines various government regulations targeted at changing behaviour against plastic bags consumption and their effectiveness. Following a rigorous search in 13 databases, including PubMed, Science Direct, Springer Nature, etc. only 17 peer-reviewed journal articles that are published between 2000 and 2019 and met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Each study’s methodological quality was assessed using the GRADE system, and data were extracted using a uniquely designed form. The results revealed that regulations based solely on the thickness of plastic bags does not reduce plastic bags consumption. However, regulations focused on banning ‘single-use’ plastic bag usage, imposing higher taxes and levies on consumers, significantly reduce plastic bags consumption. Overall, the latter is considered the most effective. Also, the results show that attitude, perception and behaviour change toward bio-degradable products or climate-friendly behaviour can be significantly influenced by public policy or regulations. Although the behaviour seems short-lived in some countries, therefore further studies need to probe on why. Also, the absence of a national regulatory strategy in North America reduced the inclusion of studies from the region, hence need for more research focusing on sub-national regulations.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Thompson RC, Swan SH, Moore CJ, vom Saal FS. Our plastic age. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2009;364(1526):1973–6. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0054.

Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci Adv. 2017;3(7):e1700782. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782.

Parker, L. Plastic bag bans are spreading. But are they truly effective? National Geographic. 2019. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2019/04/plastic-bag-bans-kenya-to-us-reduce-pollution/#closeRitch. Retrieved 12 Dec 2020.

Excell C, Salcedo-La Viña C, Worker J, Moses E. Legal limits on single-use plastics and microplastics: a global review of National Laws and Regulations. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2019. https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/report/legal-limits-single-use-plastics-and-microplastics.

Derraik JGB. The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris. Mar Pollut Bull. 2002;44(9):842–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00220-5.

Gregory RM. Plastics and South Pacific Island shores: environmental implications. Ocean Coast Manag. 1999;42(6–7):603–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(99)00036-8.

Horton AA, Walton A, Spurgeon DJ, Lahive E, Svendsen C. Microplastics in freshwater and terrestrial environments: evaluating the current understanding to identify the knowledge gaps and future research priorities. Sci Tot Environ. 2017;586:127–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.

Giacovelli C. Single-use plastics: a roadmap for sustainability. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2018. https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/report/single-use-plastics-roadmap-sustainability. Retrieved 16 Dec 2020.

Brennan C, MacLeod C. Plastic bag politics: modifying consumer behaviour for sustainable development. Int J Consum Stud. 2009;33(2):168–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00749.

Griggs MB. Canada plans to ban single-use plastics by 2021. The Verge. June 10, 2019. https://www.theverge.com/2019/6/10/18659644/canada-ban-single-use-plastics-bags-straws-2021.

British Broadcasting Company (BBC). Irish bag tax hailed a success. 2002. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/2205419.stm. Retrieved 17 Sept 2020.

Dikgang J, Leiman A, Visser M. Analysis of the plastic-bag levy in South Africa. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2012;66:59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.06.009.

Skinner BF. Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan; 1953.

Jakovcevic A, Steg L, Mazzeo N, Caballero R, Franco P, Putrino N, Favara J. Charges for plastic bags: motivational and behavioral effects. J Environ Psychol. 2014;40:372–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.004.

Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in healthcare (3rd ed.). Systematic reviews. University of York. 2009. https://www.york.ac.uk/media/crd/Systematic_Reviews.pdf.

Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane book series. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken; 2008.

Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Norris S, Guyatt GH. Grade guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):401–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The PRISMA statement for re- porting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:W65-94.

Nielsen TD, Holmberg K, Stripple J. Need a bag? A review of public policies on plastic carrier bags—where, how and to what effect? Waste Manag. 2019;87:428–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.025.

Dikgang J, Visser M. Behavioural response to plastic bag legislation in Botswana. S Afr J Econ. 2012;80(1):123–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1813-6982.2011.01289.x.

Madigele PK, Mogomotsi GEJ, Goemeone EJ, Kolobe M. Consumer willingness to pay for plastic bags levy and willingness to accept eco-friendly alternatives in Botswana. Chin J Popul Resour Environ. 2017;15(3):255–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10042857.2017.1369243.

Mogomotsi PK, Mogomotsi GEJ, Phonchi ND. Plastic bag usage in a taxed environment: investigation on the deterrent nature of plastic levy in Maun, Botswana. Waste Manag Res. 2019;37(1):20–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X18801495.

Omondi I, Asari M. Impact of plastic bag ban on behavior and attitudes in Kenya. The 30th annual conference of JSMCWM, 2019, Article 7, 533–4. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsmcwm/30/0/30_533/_pdf/-char/ja.

Dikgang J, Leiman A, Visser M. Elasticity of demand, price and time: lessons from South Africa’s plastic-bag levy. Appl Econ. 2012;44(26):3339–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.572859.

Hasson R, Leiman A, Visser M. The economics of plastic bag legislation in South Africa. S Afr J Econ. 2007;75(1):66–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1813-6982.2007.00101.x.

Chitotombe JW. The plastic bag ‘ban’ controversy in Zimbabwe: an analysis of policy issues and local responses. Int J Dev Sustain. 2014;3(5):1000–1012. https://isdsnet.com/ijds-v3n5-6.pdf.

He H. Effects of environmental policy on consumption: lessons from the Chinese plastic bag regulation. Environ Dev Econ. 2012;17(4):407–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X1200006X.

Zhu Q. An appraisal and analysis of the law of “plastic-bag ban.” Energy Procedia. 2011;5:2516–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.432.

Xing, X. Study on the ban on free plastic bags in China. J Sustain Dev. 2009;2(1):156–158. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2d78/c1857c4af970b0f291749a6feb59ad4f8f18.pdf.

Asmuni S, Hussin NB, Khalili JM, Zain ZM. Public participation and effectiveness of the no plastic bag day program in Malaysia. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;168:328–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.238.

Zen IS, Ahamad R, Omar W. No plastic bag campaign day in Malaysia and the policy implication. Environ Dev Sustain. 2013;15(5):1259–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-013-9437-1.

Convery F, McDonnell S, Ferreira S. The most popular tax in Europe? Lessons from the Irish plastic bags levy. Environ Resour Econ. 2007;38(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9059-2.

Ayalon O, Goldrath T, Rosenthal G, Grossman M. Reduction of plastic carrier bag use. Waste Manag. 2009;29(7):2025–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.02.016.

Martinho G, Balaia N, Pires A. The Portuguese plastic carrier bag tax: the effects on consumers’ behavior. Waste Manag. 2017;61:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.023.

Thomas GO, Sautkina E, Poortinga W, Wolstenholme E, Whitmarsh L. The english plastic bag charge changed behavior and increased support for other charges to reduce plastic waste. Front Psychol. 2019;10:266. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00266.

Heidbreder LM, Bablok I, Drews S, Menzel C. Tackling the plastic problem: a review on perceptions, behaviors, and interventions. Sci Tot Environ. 2019;668:1077–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.437.

Scientist Action and Advocacy Network (ScAAN). Effectiveness of plastic regulation around the world. 2019. https://plasticpollutioncoalitionresources.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Effectiveness_of_plastic_regulation_around_the_world_4_pages.pdf.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Discover Sustainability

Tập 2 Số 1

Thông tin tác giả