Effectiveness of a worksheet for diagnosing postmortem computed tomography in emergency departments

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 29 - Trang 701-706 - 2011
Naoya Takahashi1, Takeshi Higuchi1, Motoi Shiotani1, Suguru Satou1, Yasuo Hirose2
1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Niigata City General Hospital, Niigata, Japan
2Department of Emergency and Critical Care, Niigata City General Hospital, Niigata, Japan

Tóm tắt

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a worksheet for diagnosing postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) in emergency departments (EDs). A total of 49 cases of clinically diagnosed nontraumatic deaths in the ED who underwent total body PMCT were enrolled. PMCT images were prospectively evaluated by four radiologists: two radiologists with 1.5 and 3.5 years of residency and two board-certified radiologists with >20 years of experience. Readers were independently instructed to detect and interpret findings with reference to fatal findings, postmortem features, changes caused by cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and other pathological findings according to a worksheet that was composed of the possible findings previously reported. Agreement on detection and interpretation of findings between each reader was measured using Cohen’s kappa coefficients. For the detection of findings, there was substantial agreement among the four readers (kappa > 0.60, P < 0.0001). There was substantial (kappa > 0.60, P < 0.0001) and near-substantial (kappa = 0.60, P < 0.0001) agreement in the interpretation of the finding. Results of our study suggest equivalency on diagnosing PMCT regardless of the reader’s level of experience. We conclude that the worksheet is useful for diagnosing PMCT in emergency departments.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Mushtaq F, Ritchie D. Do we know what people die of in the emergency department? Emerg Med J 2005;22:718–721. Quigley M, Burton J. Evidence for cause of death in patients dying in an accident and emergency department. Emerg Med J 2003;20:349–351. Leth PM. The use of CT scanning in forensic autopsy. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2007;3:65–69. Mitka M. CT, MRI scans offer new tools for autopsy. JAMA 2007;298:392–393. O’Donnell C, Woodford N. Post-mortem radiology: a new sub-speciality? Clin Radiol 2008;63:1189–1194. Thali MJ, Yen K, Schweitzer W, Vock P, Boesch C, Ozdoba C, et al. Virtopsy, a new imaging horizon in forensic pathology: virtual autopsy by postmortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): a feasibility study. J Forensic Sci 2003;48:386–403. Sakamoto M, Ohashi N, Yuuichi H, Kohno M, Shiotani S, Hayakawa H, et al. Answers to questionnaire regarding current status and future subjects of postmortem imaging in Japanese emergency center hospitals. Jpn J Acute Med (Kyukyu Igaku) 2009;33:985–989. Ezawa H, Shiotani S, Uchigasaki S. Autopsy imaging in Japan. Rechtsmedizin 2007;17:19–20. Kaneko T, Hibi M, Ishibashi M, Nakatsuka A, Omori Y, Ishikura K, et al. Postmortem computed tomography is an informative approach for prevention of sudden unexpected natural death in the elderly. Risk Management Healthcare Policy 2010;3:13–20. Christe A, Flach P, Ross S, Spendlove D, Bolliger S, Vock P, et al. Clinical radiology and postmortem imaging (Virtopsy) are not the same: specific and unspecific postmortem signs. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2010;12:215–222. Jackowski C, Thali M, Aghayev E, Yen K, Sonnenschein M, Zwygart K, et al. Postmortem imaging of blood and its characteristics using MSCT and MRI. Int J Legal Med 2006;120:233–240. Levy AD, Harcke HT, Mallak CT. Postmortem imaging: MDCT features of postmortem change and decomposition. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2010;31:12–17. Shiotani S, Kohno M, Ohashi N, Atake S, Yamazaki K, Nakayama H. Cardiovascular gas on non-traumatic postmortem computed tomography (PMCT): the influence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Radiat Med 2005;23:225–229. Shiotani S, Kohno M, Ohashi N, Yamazaki K, Nakayama H, Watanabe K, et al. Non-traumatic postmortem computed tomographic (PMCT) findings of the lung. Forensic Sci Int 2004;139:39–48. Takahashi N, Higuchi T, Shiotani M, Maeda H, Hirose Y. Intrahepatic gas at postmortem multislice computed tomography in cases of nontraumatic death. Jpn J Radiol 2009;27:264–268. Takahashi N, Satou C, Higuchi T, Shiotani M, Maeda H, Hirose Y. Quantitative analysis of brain edema and swelling on early postmortem computed tomography: comparison with antemortem computed tomography. Jpn J Radiol 2010;28:349–354. Takahashi N, Satou C, Higuchi T, Shiotani M, Maeda H, Hirose Y. Quantitative analysis of intracranial hypostasis: comparison of early postmortem and antemortem CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:W388–W393. Shiotani S, Kohno M, Ohashi N, Yamazaki K, Nakayama H, Watanabe K. Postmortem computed tomographic (PMCT) demonstration of the relation between gastrointestinal (GI) distension and hepatic portal venous gas (HPVG). Radiat Med 2004;22:25–29. Yamazaki K, Shiotani S, Ohashi N, Doi M, Kikuchi K, Nagata C, et al. Comparison between computed tomography (CT) and autopsy findings in cases of abdominal injury and disease. Forensic Sci Int 2006;162:163–166. Oyake Y, Aoki T, Shiotani S, Kohno M, Ohashi N, Akutsu H, et al. Postmortem computed tomography for detecting causes of sudden death in infants and children: retrospective review of cases. Radiat Med 2006;24:493–502. Shiotani S, Kobayashi T, Hayakawa H, Kikuchi K, Kohno M. Postmortem pulmonary edema: a comparison between immediate and delayed postmortem computed tomography. Legal Med 2011;13:151–155. Shiotani S, Kohno M, Ohashi N, Yamazaki K, Itai Y. Postmortem intravascular high-density fluid level (hypostasis): CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002;26:892–893. Shiotani S, Ueno Y, Atake S, Kohno M, Suzuki M, Kikuchi K, et al. Nontraumatic postmortem computed tomographic demonstration of cerebral gas embolism following cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Jpn J Radiol 2010;28:1–7. Takahashi N, Higuchi T, Shiotani M, Sato S, Maeda H, Hirose Y. The check sheet for diagnosis of postmortem CT: development and the first impression. Jpn J Clin Radiol (Rinsho Houshasen) 2010;55:334–340. Crewson PE. Reader agreement studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1391–1397. Kundel HL, Polansky M. Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology 2003;228:303–308. Filograna L, Tartaglione T, Filograna E, Cittadini F, Oliva A, Pascali VL. Computed tomography (CT) virtual autopsy and classical autopsy discrepancies: radiologist’s error or a demonstration of post-mortem multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) limitation? Forensic Sci Int 2010;195:e13–e17. Berlin L. Malpractice issues in radiology: perceptual errors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:587–590. Kinard RE, Orrison WW, Brogdon BG. The value of a worksheet in reporting body-CT examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;147:848–849. Yen K, Lovblad KO, Scheurer E, Ozdoba C, Thali MJ, Aghayev E, et al. Post-mortem forensic neuroimaging: correlation of MSCT and MRI findings with autopsy results. Forensic Sci Int 2007;173:21–35.