Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength between CAD/CAM bioceramic and resin blocks and orthodontic metal brackets bonded to each other
Tóm tắt
This in vitro study aimed to evaluate shear bond strength (SBS) between CAD/CAM blocks with different compositions and orthodontic metal brackets, following various surface treatments and bonding procedure. Specimens were prepared from Vita Enamic, CeraSmart, Tetric CAD and Vita Mark II CAD/CAM blocks and were subjected to thermocycling for 5000 cycles. Then, the specimens were allocated into 6 groups according to the surface treatment (n = 12): control (no surface treatment); hydrofluoric acid etching (HF); air-borne particle abrasion with aluminium-oxide; tribochemical silica coating; bur abrasion; and Monobond Etch and Prime application (MEP). The surface morphology of the CAD/CAM blocks was characterized using scanning electron microscope. Then, specimens were silanized and brackets were bonded with adhesive resin. After thermocycling, the SBS test was performed until failure, and failure types were noted according to the adhesive remnant index (ARI). Data were analysed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests to perform pairwise analyses. The significance level was taken as α = 0.05. Both the CAD/CAM block type and the surface treatment significantly influenced SBS. Control groups of all CAD/CAM blocks demonstrated significantly the lowest SBS values. The highest SBS values were observed for Vita Mark II specimens treated with HF among all groups. Control groups showed exclusively ARI score 5, whereas surface treated groups had lower and similar scores. All groups, except the control, had reliable SBS values (above 6 MPa). Therefore, clinicians can use MEP, novel self-etching single-component ceramic primer, safely besides other surface treatments while bonding orthodontic brackets.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Mcmorrow, S.M., Millett, D.T.: Adult orthodontics in the Republic of Ireland: specialist orthodontists’ opinions. J Orthod 44(4), 277–286 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/14653125.2017.1403144
American Association of Orthodontists.: Economics of orthodontics survey results highlight specialty trends. https://www1.aaoinfo.org/economics-of-orthodontics-survey-results-highlight-recent-specialty-trends/ (2019). Accessed 10 January 2022
Christensen, L., Luther, F.: Adults seeking orthodontic treatment: expectations, periodontal and TMD issues. Br Dent J 218(3), 111–117 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.46
Davidowitz, G., Kotick, P.G.: The use of CAD / CAM in dentistry. Dent Clin of N Am 55(3), 559–570 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2011.02.011
Giordano, R.: Materials for chairside CAD/CAM-produced restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 137(9), 14S-21S (2006). https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0397
Ruse, N.D., Sadoun, M.J.: Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 93(12), 1232–1234 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514553976
Awada, A., Nathanson, D.: Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 114(4), 587–593 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.016
Coldea, A., Swain, M.V., Thiel, N.: Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater 29(4), 419–426 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.01.002
Mainjot, A.K., Dupont, N.M., Oudkerk, J.C., Dewael, T.Y., Sadoun, M.J.: From artisanal to CAD-CAM blocks: state of the art of indirect composites. J of Dent Res 95(5), 487–495 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516634286
Stasinopoulos, D., Papageorgiou, S.N., Kirsch, F.: Failure patterns of different bracket systems and their influence on treatment duration: a retrospective cohort study. The Angle Orthod 88(3), 338–347 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2319/081817-559.1
Alzainal, A.H., Majud, A.S., Al-Ani, A.M., Mageet, A. O.: Orthodontic bonding: review of the literature. Inter J Dent 1–10(2020), 8874909 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8874909
Peumans, M., Valjakova, E.B., De Munck, J., Mishevska, C.B., Van,: Meerbeek, B: Bonding effectiveness of luting composites to different CAD/CAM materials. J Adhes Dent 18(4), 289–302 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a36155
Anusavice, K.J., Shen, C., Rawls, H.R.: Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials. Elsevier, Missouri (2014)
Schmalz, G., Arenholt-Bindslev, D.: Biocompatibility of dental materials. Springer, Berlin (2009)
Albakry, M., Guazzato, M., Vincent, M.: Effect of sandblasting, grinding, polishing, and glazing on the flexural strength of two pressable all-ceramic dental materials. J Dent 32(2), 91–99 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2003.08.006
Colombo, L., Murillo-Gómez, F., De Goes, M.F.: Bond strength of CAD/CAM restorative materials treated with different surface etching protocols. J Adhes Dent 21(4), 307–317 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a42931
Recen, D., Yıldırım, B., Othman, E., Çömlekoğlu, M.E., Aras, I.: Bond strength of metal brackets to feldspathic ceramic treated with different surface conditioning methods: an in vitro study. Eur Oral Res 55(1), 1–7 (2021). https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20210004
Franz, A., Raabe, M., Lilaj, B., Dauti, R., Moritz, A., Müßig, D., Cvikl, B.: Effect of two different primers on the shear bond strength of metallic brackets to zirconia ceramic. BMC Oral Health 28(19), 51 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0740-6
González-Serrano, C., Phark, J.H., Fuentes, M.V., Albaladejo, A., Sánchez-Monescillo, A., Duarte, S., Ceballos, L.: Effect of a single-component ceramic conditioner on shear bond strength of precoated brackets to different CAD/CAM materials. Clin Oral Investig 25(4), 1953–1965 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03504-0
de Almeida, R.M., Hass, V., Sasaki, D.Y., Berger, S.B., Fernandes, T.M., Tonetto, M.R.: The impact of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of orthodontic metal brackets applied to different CAD/CAM composites. J Clin Exp Dent 13(6), 608–613 (2021). https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.58137
Alavi, S., Shirani, F., Zarei, Z., Raji, S.: Effect of different surface treatment with panaviaV5 on shear bond strength of metal brackets to silver amalgam. Dent Res J 18(9), 1–7 (2021). https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.310038
Asiry, M.A., AlShahrani, I., Alaqeel, S.M., Durgesh, B.H., Ramakrishnaiah, R.: Effect of two-step and one-step surface conditioning of glass ceramic on adhesion strength of orthodontic bracket and effect of thermo-cycling on adhesion strength. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 84, 22–27 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.04.021
Kim, J.W., Covel, N.S., Guess, P.C., Rekow, E.D., Zhang, Y.: Concerns of hydrothermal degradation in CAD/CAM zirconia. J Dent Res 89(1), 91–95 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034509354193
Wiegand, A., Stucki, L., Hoffmann, R., Attin, T., Stawarczyk, B.: Repairability of CAD/CAM high-density PMMA- and composite-based polymers. Clin Oral Investig 19(8), 2007–2013 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1411-x
Şişmanoğlu, S., Gürcan, A.T., Yildirim-Bilmez, Z., Turunç-Oğuzman, R., Gümüştaş, B.: Effect of surface treatments and universal adhesive application on the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM materials. J Adv Prosthodont 12(1), 22–32 (2020). https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.1.22
Elsaka, S.E.: Influence of surface treatments on bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic material. Odontology 104(1), 68–76 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-014-0188-8
Gilbert, S., Keul, C., Roos, M., Edelhoff, D., Stawarczyk, B.: Bonding between CAD/CAM resin and resin composite cements dependent on bonding agents: three different in vitro test methods. Clin Oral Investig 20(2), 227–236 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1494-4
Matinlinna, J.P., Lung, C.Y.K., Tsoi, J.K.H.: Silane adhesion mechanism in dental applications and surface treatments: a review. Dent Mater 34(1), 13–28 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.002
Grewal Bach, G.K., Torrealbab, Y., Lagravère, M.O.: Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 84(3), 555–560 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2319/083013-636.1
El-Damanhoury, H.M., Gaintantzopoulou, M.D.: Self-etching ceramic primer versus hydrofluoric acid etching: etching efficacy and bonding performance. J Prosthodont Res 62(1), 75–83 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.06.002
Özarslan, M.M., Üstün, Ö., Buyukkaplan, U.S., Barutcigil, Ç., Türker, N., Barutcigil, K.: Assessment the bond strength of ceramic brackets to CAD/CAM nanoceramic composite and interpenetrating network composite after different surface treatments. BioMed Res Int (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1871598
Tian, T., Tsoi, J.K.H., Matinlinna, J.P., Burrow, M.F.: Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater 30(7), e147-162 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.01.017
Şişmanoğlu, S., Turunç-Oğuzman, R.: Microshear bond strength of contemporary self-adhesive resin cements to CAD/CAM restorative materials: effect of surface treatment and aging. J Adhes Sci and Technol 34(22), 2484–2498 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2020.1763543
Nergiz, I., Schmage, P., Herrmann, W., Özcan, M.: Effect of alloy type and surface conditioning on roughness and bond strength of metal brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 125(1), 42–50 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00507-9
Özcan, M., Vallittu, P.K.: Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 19(8), 725–731 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00019-8
Yüzbaşıoğlu, E., Sayar-Torun, G., Özcan, M.: Adhesion of orthodontic brackets to indirect laboratory-processed resin composite as a function of surface conditioning methods and artificial aging. J Adhes Sci Technol 30(23), 2565–2572 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1186327
Bayram, M., Yeşilyurt, C., Kuşgöz, A., Ülker, M., Nur, M.: Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to aged resin composite surfaces: effect of surface conditioning. Eur J Orthod 33(2), 174–179 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq048
Iijima, M., Ito, S., Muguruma, T., Saito, T., Mizoguchi, I.: Bracket bond strength comparison between new unfilled experimental self-etching primer adhesive and conventional filled adhesives. Angle Orthod 80(6), 1095–1099 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2319/012010-43.1
Lyann, S.K., Takagaki, T., Nikaido, T., Wada, T., Uo, M., Ikeda, M., Sadr, A., Tagami, J.: Efficacy of Various Surface Treatments on the Bonding Performance of Saliva-contaminated Lithium-Disilicate Ceramics. J Adhes Dent. 21(1), 51–58 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a41918.