Effect of signal strength on reproducibility of circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement and its classification by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography

Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology - Tập 55 - Trang 220-227 - 2011
Ji Hyun Kim1, Na Rae Kim1, Hyunjoong Kim2, Eun Suk Lee1, Gong Je Seong1, Chan Yun Kim1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2Department of Applied Statistics, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea

Tóm tắt

To assess the effect of signal strength (SS) on the reproducibility of circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL) thickness measurement (measurement agreement) and its color-coded classification (classification agreement) by Cirrus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). Seven hundred and eighty-nine participants, consecutively enrolled from December 2009 to August 2010, underwent two repeated Cirrus OCT scans to measure cpRNFL thickness (optic disc cube 200 × 200). Intraclass correlation (ICC) and linear-weighted kappa coefficient (κ) were calculated as indicators for cpRNFL measurement and classification agreement. The difference in cpRNFL thickness measurements between repeated OCT scans (inter-scan measurement difference) was correlated with mean SS, SS change or difference between repeated OCT scans (inter-scan SS difference), and average cpRNFL thickness. Mean SS was negatively correlated with inter-scan SS difference and was positively correlated with the inter-scan measurement difference. Repeated scans with SS change (inter-scan SS difference = 1 or 2) showed larger variability than scans without SS change (inter-scan SS difference = 0) in total average cpRNFL and all quadrant maps except for the nasal quadrant. Multivariate analysis revealed that inter-scan measurement differences increased in subjects with thinner cpRNFL thicknesses and in scans with lower mean SS and higher inter-scan SS differences. Measurement agreement (ICC) in groups with larger inter-scan SS differences (=2) was lower than those with smaller inter-scan SS differences (=0 or 1) in their average cpRNFL and inferior quadrant maps. Classification agreement (κ) in groups with larger inter-scan SS differences (=2) was lower than those with smaller inter-scan SS differences (=0 or 1) in their average cpRNFL and quadrant maps (superior and inferior quadrant) although statistically not significant. Special attention should be paid when comparing the cpRNFL thickness measurement and color-coded classification of 2 or more Cirrus OCT scans as the agreements may be susceptible to SS differences.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Wojtkowski M, Bajraszewski T, Gorczyrczy I, Targowski P, Kowalczyk A, Wasilewski W, et al. Ophthalmic imaging by spectral optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:412–9. Chen TC, Cense B, Pierce MC, Nassif N, Park BH, Yun SH, et al. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography: ultra-high speed, ultra-high resolution ophthalmic imaging. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1715–20. Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. Cirrus HD-OCT user manual. Dublin: Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.; 2008;4.18–9. Rev. A. Cheung CY, Leung CK, Lin D, Pang CP, Lam DS. Relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer measurement and signal strength in optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1347–51. Wu Z, Huang J, Dustin L, Sadda SR. Signal strength is an important determinant of accuracy of nerve fiber layer thickness measurement by optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma. 2009;18:213–6. Wu Z, Vazeen M, Varma R, Chopra V, Walsh AC, LaBree LD, et al. Factors associated with variability in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements obtained by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1505–12. Sung KR, Kim DY, Park SB, Kook MS. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Cirrus HD and Stratus optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1264–70. Knight OJ, Chang RT, Feuer WJ, Budenz DL. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherent tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1271–7. Vizzeri G, Weinreb RN, Gonzalez-Garcia AO, Bowd C, Medeiros FA, Sample PA, et al. Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:775–81. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1978. Hong S, Kim CY, Lee WS, Seong GJ. Reproducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness with spectral domain cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography in normal eyes. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2010;54:43–7. Paunescu LA, Schuman JS, Price LL, Stark PC, Beaton S, Ishikawa H, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using Stratus OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1716–24. Budenz DL, Fredette MJ, Feuer WJ, Anderson DR. Reproducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber thickness measurements with Stratus OCT in glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:661–6. Schuman JS, Pedut-Kloizman T, Hertzmark E, Hee MR, Wilkins JR, Coker JG, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1889–98. Mills RP, Budenz DL, Lee PP, Noecker RJ, Walt JG, Siegartel LR, et al. Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:24–30. Budenz DL, Chang RT, Huang X, Knighton RW, Tielsch JM. Reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber thickness measurements using the stratus OCT in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2440–3. Leung CK, Ye C, Weinreb RN, Cheung CY, Qiu Q, Liu S, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a variability and diagnostic performance study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1257–63. Knighton RW, Qian C. An optical model of the human retinal nerve fiber layer: implications of directional reflectance for variability of clinical measurements. J Glaucoma. 2000;9:56–62.