Effect of residual patient motion on dose distribution during image-guided robotic radiosurgery for skull tracking based on log file analysis
Tóm tắt
The present study aimed to assess the effect of residual patient motion on dose distribution during intracranial image-guided robotic radiosurgery by analyzing the system log files. The dosimetric effect was analyzed according to the difference between the original and estimated dose distributions, including targeting error, caused by residual patient motion between two successive image acquisitions. One hundred twenty-eight treatments were analyzed. Forty-two patients were treated using the isocentric plan, and 86 patients were treated using the conformal (non-isocentric) plan. The median distance from the imaging center to the target was 55 mm, and the median interval between the acquisitions of sequential images was 79 s. The median translational residual patient motion was 0.1 mm for each axis, and the rotational residual patient motion was 0.1° for Δpitch and Δroll and 0.2° for Δyaw. The dose error for D
95 was within 1 % in more than 95 % of cases. The maximum dose error for D
10 to D
90 was within 2 %. None of the studied parameters, including the interval between the acquisitions of sequential images, was significantly related to the dosimetric effect. The effect of residual patient motion on dose distribution was minimal.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Kilby W, Dooley JR, Kuduvalli G, Sayeh S, Maurer CR Jr. The CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery system in 2010. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2010;9(5):433–52.
Murphy MJ, Chang SD, Gibbs IC, Le QT, Hai J, Kim D, et al. Patterns of patient movement during frameless image-guided radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;55(5):1400–8.
Murphy MJ. Intrafraction geometric uncertainties in frameless image-guided radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73(5):1364–8.
Chang SD, Main W, Martin DP, Gibbs IC, Heilbrun MP. An analysis of the accuracy of the CyberKnife: a robotic frameless stereotactic radiosurgical system. Neurosurgery. 2003;52(1):140–6 (discussion 6–7).
Inoue M, Omori R, Sato K, Baba Y, Himei K, Takemoto M. The accuracy of the CyberKnife. J Jpn Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. 2003;15:177–85.
Muacevic A, Staehler M, Drexler C, Wowra B, Reiser M, Tonn JC. Technical description, phantom accuracy, and clinical feasibility for fiducial-free frameless real-time image-guided spinal radiosurgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;5(4):303–12.
Furweger C, Drexler C, Kufeld M, Muacevic A, Wowra B. Advances in fiducial-free image-guidance for spinal radiosurgery with CyberKnife–a phantom study. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011;12(2):3446.
Chuang C, Sahgal A, Lee L, Larson D, Huang K, Petti P, et al. Effects of residual target motion for image-tracked spine radiosurgery. Med Phys. 2007;34(11):4484–90.
Furweger C, Drexler C, Kufeld M, Muacevic A, Wowra B, Schlaefer A. Patient motion and targeting accuracy in robotic spinal radiosurgery: 260 single-fraction fiducial-free cases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;78(3):937–45.
Fu D, Kuduvalli G. A fast, accurate, and automatic 2D-3D image registration for image-guided cranial radiosurgery. Med Phys. 2008;35(5):2180–94.
Murphy MJ, Cox RS. The accuracy of dose localization for an image-guided frameless radiosurgery system. Med Phys. 1996;23(12):2043–9.