Effect of perioperative complications and functional outcomes on health-related quality of life after radical prostatectomy
Tóm tắt
Radical prostatectomy is a commonly performed procedure with perioperative complication rates of 30 % using standardized reporting methodology. We aim to determine whether perioperative complications and functional outcomes impact quality of life 1 year after surgical treatment. Quality of life, functional and oncological outcomes were assessed in patients who underwent open retropubic radical prostatectomy at a single academic institution between 2003 and 2009, preoperatively and 1 year after surgery using the EORTC QLQ-C30, the IIEF-5 and an institutional questionnaire. Perioperative complications were recorded using the Clavien–Dindo classification. Patients without complications were compared to patients with any, low- or high-grade complications. The global health score domain of the EORTC QLQ-C30 is reported for various oncological and functional outcomes and contrasted to stratified categories of complications and functional outcomes. A full dataset was available for 29.5 % (n = 856) of all patients. The overall complication rate was 27.5 % (235/856). A total of 307 complications were recorded of whom 88.9 % (273/307) were low grade. In this study, population global health perception did not decline after surgery (70.5 ± 21.2 vs. 74.4 ± 19.7; p < 0.0001). Complications showed only statistical but no clinical meaningful influence on global health perception as well as on functional and symptom scales. Patients who met combined outcome criteria experienced the best postoperative global health score (86.0 ± 13.1 and 86.0 ± 14.2). Perioperative complications and functional outcomes have a measurable impact on quality of life 1 year following surgery. While perioperative complications have a statistical effect, functional outcomes showed a clinically more profound effect on postoperative global health perception.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Eastham, J. A., Scardino, P. T., & Kattan, M. W. (2008). Predicting an optimal outcome after radical prostatectomy: The trifecta nomogram. The Journal of Urology, 179(6), 2207–2210. (discussion 2210-220).
Patel, V. R., Sivaraman, A., Coelho, R. F., Chauhan, S., Palmer, K. J., Orvieto, M. A., et al. (2011). Pentafecta: A new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. European Urology, 59(5), 702–707.
Treiyer, A., Anheuser, P., Butow, Z., & Steffens, J. (2011). A single center prospective study: Prediction of postoperative general quality of life, potency and continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. The Journal of Urology, 185(5), 1681–1685.
Perl, M., Waldmann, A., Pritzkuleit, R., & Katalinic, A. (2012). Temporal changes in quality of life after prostate carcinoma. Der Urologe Ausg A, 51(5), 706–712.
Viklund, P., Lindblad, M., & Lagergren, J. (2005). Influence of surgery-related factors on quality of life after esophageal or cardia cancer resection. World Journal of Surgery, 29(7), 841–848.
Dindo, D., Demartines, N., & Clavien, P.-A. (2004). Classification of surgical complications. Annals of Surgery, 240(2), 205–213.
Novara, G., Ficarra, V., D’Elia, C., Secco, S., Cavalleri, S., & Artibani, W. (2010). Prospective evaluation with standardised criteria for postoperative complications after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. European Urology, 57(3), 363–370.
Hruza, M., Weiss, H. O., Pini, G., Goezen, A. S., Schulze, M., Teber, D., et al. (2010). Complications in 2200 consecutive laparoscopic radical prostatectomies: Standardised evaluation and analysis of learning curves. European Urology, 58(5), 733–741.
Rabbani, F., Yunis, L. H., Pinochet, R., Nogueira, L., Vora, K. C., Eastham, J. A., et al. (2010). Comprehensive standardized report of complications of retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. European Urology, 57(3), 371–386.
Walsh, P. C., & Donker, P. J. (1982). Impotence following radical prostatectomy: Insight into etiology and prevention. The Journal of Urology, 128(3), 492–497.
Graefen, M., Michl, U. H. G., Heinzer, H., Friedrich, M. G., Eichelberg, C., Haese, A., et al. (2005). Indication, technique and outcome of retropubic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. EAU Update Series, 3(2), 77–85.
Rhoden, E. L., Teloken, C., Sogari, P. R., & Vargas Souto, C. A. (2002). The use of the simplified International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool to study the prevalence of erectile dysfunction. International Journal of Impotence Research, 14(4), 245–250.
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376.
Osoba, D., Rodrigues, G., Myles, J., Zee, B., & Pater, J. (1998). Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16(1), 139–144.
Cocks, K., King, M. T., Velikova, G., de Castro, G., St-James, M. M., Jr, Fayers, P. M., et al. (2012). Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30. European Journal of Cancer, 48(11), 1713–1721.
Fayers, P. M., Aaronson, N. K., Bjordal, K., Groenvold, M., Curran, D., Bottomley, A., et al. (2001). The EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual (3rd ed.). Brussels: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60.
Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1(6), 80–83.
Pearson, K. (1900). On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 50(302), 157–175.
Loppenberg, B., Noldus, J., Holz, A., & Palisaar, R. J. (2010). Reporting complications after open radical retropubic prostatectomy using the Martin criteria. The Journal of Urology, 184(3), 944–948.
Schwarz, R., & Hinz, A. (2001). Reference data for the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 in the general German population. European Journal of Cancer, 37(11), 1345–1351.
Scott, N. W., Fayers, P. M., Aaronson, N. K., Bottomley, A., de Graeff, A., Groenvold, M., et al. (2008). EORTC QLQ-C30 reference values. Brussels: EORTC Quality of Life Group.
Hjermstad, M. J., Fayers, P. M., Bjordal, K., & Kaasa, S. (1998). Using reference data on quality of life—The importance of adjusting for age and gender, exemplified by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (+3). European Journal of Cancer, 34(9), 1381–1389.
Waldmann, A., Schubert, D., & Katalinic, A. (2013). Normative data of the EORTC QLQ-C30 for the German population: A population-based survey. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e74149.
King, M. T. (1996). The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research, 5(6), 555–567.
Augustin, H., Pummer, K., Daghofer, F., Habermann, H., Primus, G., & Hubmer, G. (2002). Patient self-reporting questionnaire on urological morbidity and bother after radical retropubic prostatectomy. European Urology, 42(2), 112–117.
Giberti, C., Chiono, L., Gallo, F., Schenone, M., & Gastaldi, E. (2009). Radical retropubic prostatectomy versus brachytherapy for low-risk prostatic cancer: A prospective study. World Journal of Urology, 27(5), 607–612.
Barry, M. J., Gallagher, P. M., Skinner, J. S., & Fowler, F. J., Jr. (2012). Adverse effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy among a nationwide random sample of medicare-age men. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30(5), 513–518.
Malcolm, J. B., Fabrizio, M. D., Barone, B. B., Given, R. W., Lance, R. S., Lynch, D. F., et al. (2010). Quality of life after open or robotic prostatectomy, cryoablation or brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. The Journal of Urology, 183(5), 1822–1828.
Soderdahl, D. W., Davis, J. W., Schellhammer, P. F., Given, R. W., Lynch, D. F., Shaves, M., et al. (2005). Prospective longitudinal comparative study of health-related quality of life in patients undergoing invasive treatments for localized prostate cancer. Journal of Endourology, 19(3), 318–326.
Agarwal, P. K., Sammon, J., Bhandari, A., Dabaja, A., Diaz, M., Dusik-Fenton, S., et al. (2011). Safety profile of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A standardized report of complications in 3317 patients. European Urology, 59(5), 684–698.
Sprangers, M. A., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). The challenge of response shift for quality-of-life-based clinical oncology research. Annals of Oncology, 10(7), 747–749.