Effect of friction stir processing tool probe on fabrication of SiC particle reinforced composite on aluminium surface

Science and Technology of Welding and Joining - Tập 14 Số 5 - Trang 413-425 - 2009
Essam R. I. Mahmoud1, Makoto Takahashi1, Toshiya Shibayanagi1, Kenji Ikeuchi1
1Department of Material Technology and Manufacturing, Joining and Welding Research Institute, Osaka University, Osaka University, 11-1 Mihogaoka, Ibaraki-shi, Osaka, 567-0047, Japan

Tóm tắt

An investigation has been carried out of the effects of tool probe shape and size on the formation of surface composite by uniformly distributing SiC particles into a surface layer of an A1050-H24 aluminium plate through friction stir processing (FSP). Tool probes of three different diameters (3, 5 and 7 mm) and four different shapes (circular with threads, circular without threads, square and triangular) have been used to fabricate the surface layers at rotation speeds of 1500–2250 rev min−1 and a travelling speed of 1·66 mm s−1. The SiC particles were packed into a groove of 3 mm width and 1·5 mm depth cut on the aluminium plate and covered by an aluminium sheet of 2 mm thickness. A rotating tool was plunged into the plate through the cover sheet so that the tip of the probe reached beyond the bottom of the groove. As a result, it was found that the square probe dispersed the SiC particles homogeneously in the nugget zone compared with other probe shapes regardless of the rotation speeds. Furthermore, the distributed particles and also the aluminium matrix grain size became finer by the use of square probe than those of the other shapes. On the other hand, the wear rates of the square and triangular probes were higher than that of circular shape. The worn iron debris from the tool reacted with aluminium matrix and form fine iron aluminides compound dispersed in the nugget zone. The probe size had limited effects on the homogeneity of the SiC particles distribution in the nugget zone; the distribution of SiC particles obtained by triple FSP passes was less homogeneous when the probe size was smaller. Microhardness of the nugget zone was homogeneously increased to a level as high as 60 HV with tool of square probe shape after three passes to be compared with 23 HV of the aluminium matrix beside the nugget zone.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00329-2

Ma Z. Y., 2002, Mater, 50, 4419

10.1016/j.mser.2005.07.001

10.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.021

10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00824-9

10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.005

10.1016/j.msea.2006.06.099

10.1016/j.msea.2006.07.150

10.1016/S1359-6462(00)00578-9

10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.04.006

10.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.054

10.1016/j.matlet.2006.07.021

10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00199-5

10.1088/0957-4484/17/12/044

10.1016/j.msea.2006.01.016

10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.056

10.1007/s11661-007-9459-0

10.1007/s00170-007-1100-2

10.1007/BF03266403

10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.028

10.1179/174329305X36070

10.1088/0965-0393/12/1/013

10.1007/s00170-006-0707-z

10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.10.008

10.1007/s11661-006-1076-9

Colligan K., 1999, Weld. J, 229s

10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.10.048

10.1016/S1044-5803(02)00362-5

10.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.052

10.1179/174329306X113271

10.1007/s11661-001-1038-1

10.1016/j.msea.2005.11.045

10.1016/j.matdes.2006.01.031

10.1016/j.matlet.2005.04.048

10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.07.005

10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.124

10.1016/j.matdes.2003.11.005

10.1007/s00170-006-0901-z

10.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.030

10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.027

10.1007/s11837-001-0139-z

10.1016/j.matchar.2005.01.012

10.1016/S0261-3069(00)00081-9

10.1179/136217108X333327

10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01474-5

10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.10.026

10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.02.003

10.1179/174329307X213639

Sutton M. A., 2002, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1

10.1179/174329306X77056

10.1179/174329308X283910

10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.05.001

10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.10.008

10.1007/s00170-007-1071-3

10.1179/136217104225021832

10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.03.015

10.1179/136217103225010952

10.1179/174329307X197566

Elangovan K., 2008, J. Mater. Process. Technol, 1

10.1179/136217104225021670

10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.09.056

10.1007/BF02586138

10.1179/136217104225021661