Effect of computed tomography number-relative electron density conversion curve on the calculation of radiotherapy dose and evaluation of Monaco radiotherapy treatment planning system

Van Dyk J, Barnett R, Cygler J, Shragge P (1993) Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 26(2):261–273 Gershkevitsh E, Schmidt R, Velez G, Miller D, Korf E, Yip F et al (2008) Dosimetric verification of radiotherapy treatment planning systems: Results of IAEA pilot study. Radiother Oncol 89(3):338–346 Bahreyni Toossi MT, Farhood B, Soleymanifard S (2017) Evaluation of dose calculations accuracy of a commercial treatment planning system for the head and neck region in radiotherapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 22(5):420–427 Constantinou C, Harrington JC, DeWerd LA (1992) An electron density calibration phantom for CT-based treatment planning computers. Med Phys 19(2):325–327 International Atomic Energy Agency (2008) Commissioning of radiotherapy treatment planning systems: testing for typical external beam treatment techniques, TECDOC No 1583. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna Knöös T, Nilsson M, Ahlgren L (1986) A method for conversion of Hounsfield number to electron density and prediction of macroscopic pair production cross-sections. Radiother Oncol 5(4):337–345 Millner MR, McDavid WD, Waggener RG, Dennis MJ, Payne WH, Sank VJ (1979) Extraction of information from CT scans at different energies. Med Phys 6(1):70–71 Guan H, Yin FF, Kim JH (2002) Accuracy of inhomogeneity correction in photon radiotherapy from CT scans with different settings. Phys Med Biol 47(17):223–231 Ebert MA, Lambert J, Greer PB (2008) CT-ED conversion on a GE Lightspeed-RT scanner: influence of scanner settings. Aust Phys Eng Sci Med 31(2):154–159 Nobah A, Moftah B, Tomic N, Devic S (2011) Influence of electron density spatial distribution and X-ray beam quality during CT simulation on dose calculation accuracy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 12(3):80–89 Baxter BS, Sorenson JA (1981) Factors affecting the measurement of size and CT number in computed tomography. Invest Radiol 16(4):337–341 Groell R, Rienmueller R, Schaffler GJ, Portugaller HR, Graif E, Willfurth P (2000) CT number variations due to different image acquisition and reconstruction parameters: a thorax phantom study. Comput Med Imaging Graph 24(2):53–58 Fraas B, Doppke K, Hunt M (1998) Quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning, AAPM Radiation Therapy committee TG53. Med Phys 25(10):1773–1829 Andreo P, Cramb J, Fraass B, Ionescu–Farca F, Izewska J, Levin V et al (2004) Commissioning and quality assurance of computerized planning systems for radiation treatment of cancer, Technical Report Series 430. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna Mijnheer B, Olszewska A, Fiorino C, Hartmann G, Knöös T, Rosenwald JC et al (2004) Quality assurance of treatment planning systems: practical examples for non-IMRT photon beams. ESTRO, Brussels International Atomic Energy Agency (2007) Specification and acceptance testing of radiotherapy treatment planning systems, TECDOC No 1540. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna Venselaar J, Welleweerd H, Mijnheer B (2001) Tolerances for the accuracy of photon beam dose calculations of treatment planning systems. Radiother Oncol 60(2):191–201 American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 65 of the Radiation Therapy Committee. Report 85 (2004) Tissue inhomogeneity corrections for megavoltage photon beams. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison Thomson E, Edyvean S (1999) Sect. 3.2. In: IPEM Report 88. Physical aspects of quality control in radiotherapy. York, UK. Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine Bissonnette JP, Balter P, Dong L, Lovelock M, Miften M, Moseley D et al (2012) Quality assurance for image guided radiation therapy utilizing CT-based technologies: a report of the AAPM TG-179. Med Phys 39(4):1946–1963 IAEA (2012) IAEA Human Health Series No 19, Quality Assurance for Computed Tomography. Diagnostic and Therapy Applications, IAEA, Vienna Davis AT, Palmer AL, Nisbet A (2017) Can CT scan protocols used for radiotherapy treatment planning be adjusted to optimize image quality and patient dose? A systematic review. Br J Radiol 90(1076):20160406 . Inness EK, Moutrie V, Charles PH (2014) The dependence of computed tomography number to relative electron density conversion on phantom geometry and its impact on planned dose. Aust Phys Eng Sci Med 37(2):385–391 Cozzi L, Fogliata A, Buffa F, Bieri S (1998) Dosimetric impact of computed tomography calibration on a commercial treatment planning system for external radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 48(3):335–338 Clements M, Schupp N, Tattersall M, Brown A, Larson R (2018) Monaco treatment planning system tools and optimization processes. Med Dosim 43(2):106–117 Kragl G, Albrich D, Georg D (2011) Radiation therapy with unflattened photon beams: dosimetric accuracy of advanced dose calculation algorithms. Radiother Oncol 100(3):417–423 Boggula R, Jahnke L, Wertz H, Lohr F, Wenz F (2011) Patient-specific 3D pretreatment and potential 3D online dose verification of Monte Carlo-calculated IMRT prostate treatment plans. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81(4):1168–1175 Lopez-Tarjuelo J, Garcia-Molla R, Juan-Senabre X, Quirós-Higueras J, Santos-Serra A, de Marco-Blancas N et al (2014) Acceptance and commissioning of a treatment planning system based on Monte Carlo calculations. Technol Cancer Res Treat 13(2):129–138 Li X, Xu B, Lei Y, Zhang J, Lin Z, Li S (2018) Evaluation of dose calculations with inhomogeneity correction in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for esophagus cancer. J X-Ray Sci Technol 26(4):657–666 Saenz DL, Li Y, Rasmussen K, Stathakis S, Pappas E, Papanikolaou N (2018) Dosimetric and localization accuracy of Elekta high definition dynamic radiosurgery. Phys Med 54:146–151 Shepard SJ, Lin PJP, Boone JM, Cody DD, Fisher JR, Frey GD et al (2002) AAPM Report No. 74: Quality control in diagnostic radiology, Report of task group No. 12 diagnostic X-ray imaging committee. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison Andreo P, Burns DT, Hohlfeld K, Huq MS, Kanai T, Laitano F et al (2000) Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: an international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. IAEA TRS 398, Vienna Craig T, Brochu D, Van Dyk J (1999) A quality assurance phantom for three-dimensional radiation treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44(4):955–966 Davis AT, Palmer AL, Pani S, Nisbet A (2018) Assessment of the variation in CT scanner performance (image quality and Hounsfield units) with scan parameters, for image optimisation in radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med 45:59–64 Rutonjski L, Petrović B, Baucal M, Teodorović M, Čudić O, Gershkevitsh E et al (2012) Dosimetric verification of radiotherapy treatment planning systems in Serbia: national audit. Radiat Oncol 7(1):155–162 Farhood B, Bahreyni Toossi MT, Soleymanifard S (2016) Assessment of dose calculation accuracy of tigrt treatment planning system for physical wedged fields in radiotherapy. Iran J Med Phys 13(3):146–153 Venselaar J, Welleweerd H (2001) Application of a test package in an intercomparison of the photon dose calculation performance of treatment planning systems used in a clinical setting. Radiother Oncol 60(2):203–213 Anjum M, Qadir A, Afzal M (2008) Dosimetric evaluation of a treatment planning system using pencil beam convolution algorithm for enhanced dynamic wedges with symmetric and asymmetric fields. Iran J Radiat Res 5(4):169–174 Howell RM, Scarboro SB, Kry S, Yaldo DZ (2010) Accuracy of out-of-field dose calculations by a commercial treatment planning system. Phys Med Biol 55(23):6999–7008 Huang JY, Followill DS, Wang XA, Kry SF (2013) Accuracy and sources of error of out-of field dose calculations by a commercial treatment planning system for intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments. J Appl Clin Med Phys 14(2):186–197 Mohammadi K, Hassani M, Ghorbani M, Farhood B, Knaup C (2017) Evaluation of the accuracy of various dose calculation algorithms of a commercial treatment planning system in the presence of hip prosthesis and comparison with Monte Carlo. J Cancer Res Ther 13(3):501–509 Mahmoudi G, Farhood B, Shokrani P, Amouheidari A, Atarod M (2018) Evaluation of the photon dose calculation accuracy in radiation therapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Cancer Res Ther 14(5):1029–1035 Bahreyni Toossi MT, Soleymanifard S, Farhood B, Mohebbi S, Davenport D (2018) Assessment of accuracy of out-of-field dose calculations by TiGRT treatment planning system in radiotherapy. J Cancer Res Ther 14(3):634–639 Khan FM, Gibbons JP (2014) Khan’s the physics of radiation therapy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia Chetty IJ, Curran B, Cygler JE, DeMarco JJ, Ezzell G, Faddegon BA (2007) Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 105: Issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning. Med Phys 34(12):4818–4853 Swiss Society for Radiobiology and Medical Physics (SGSMP/SSRPM/SSRFM) Quality control of treatment planning systems for teletherapy (1997) Quality control of treatment planning systems for teletherapy. SGSMP Report 7 Kilby W, Sage J, Rabett V (2002) Tolerance levels for quality assurance of electron density values generated from CT in radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 47(9):1485–1492