Effect of capacity building in alleviating poverty and improving forest conservation in the communal forests of Mexico

World Development - Tập 121 - Trang 108-122 - 2019
Juan Manuel Torres-Rojo1, Rafael Moreno-Sánchez2, Joel Amador-Callejas1
1División de Economía, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, A.C. Carr. México-Toluca No. 3655 col. Lomas de Santa Fe, Ciudad de México 01210, Mexico
2Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, 1200 Larimer Street NC 3524, Denver, CO 80204, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Agrawal, 1999, Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation, World Development, 27, 629, 10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2 Andersson, 2006, Municipal politics and forest governance: Comparative analysis of decentralization in Bolivia and Guatemala, World Development, 34, 576, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.08.009 Anta-Fonseca, 2015, 145 Antinori, 2005, Community forest enterprises as entrepreneurial firms: Economic and institutional perspectives from Mexico, World Development, 33, 1529, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.011 Antinori, 2008, Ownership and control in Mexico’s Community Forestry sector, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 57, 101, 10.1086/590459 Backhoff Pohl, 2006 Barismantov, 2012, Forest cover change and land tenure change in Mexico’s Avocado Region: Is community forestry related to reduced deforestation for high value crops?, Applied Geography, 32, 844, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.09.001 Barismantov, 2012, Community forestry, common property and deforestation in eight Mexican States, The Journal of Environment and Development, 21, 414, 10.1177/1070496512447249 Barnes, 2015, Making it last? Analysing the role of NGO interventions in the development of institutions for durable collective action in Indian community forestry, Environmental Science & Policy, 53, 192, 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.06.008 Bawa, 2007, Poverty, biodiversity and institutions in forest-agriculture ecotones in the Western Ghats and Eastern Himalaya ranges of India, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 121, 287, 10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.023 Beckley, 2008, Multiple capacities, multiple outcomes: Delving deeper into the meaning of community capacity, Journal of Rural and Community Development, 3 Bowler, 2012, Does community forest management provide global environmental benefits and improve local welfare?, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10, 29, 10.1890/110040 Bray, 2010 Bray, 2008, Tropical deforestation, community forests, and protected areas in the Maya Forest, Ecology and Society, 13, 10.5751/ES-02593-130256 Bray, D.B., & Merino-Pérez, L. (2002). The rise of Community Forestry in Mexico: History, concepts, and lessons learned from twenty-five years of community timber production. Report prepared for the Ford Foundation. Bray, 2003, Mexico's community-managed forests as a global model for sustainable landscapes, Conservation Biology, 17, 672, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01639.x Caliendo, 2008, Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching, Journal of Economic Surveys, 22, 31, 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x Carrillo-Anzures, 2017, Caracterización de Productores Forestales en 12 Estados de la República Mexicana, Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícola, 8, 1561, 10.29312/remexca.v8i7.512 Castaños-Martínez, 2015, Esfuerzos pioneros de política pública para la gestión forestal en comunidades: La Dirección General para el Desarrollo Forestal (1973–1985), 89 Charnley, 2007, Community forestry in theory and practice: Where are we now?*, Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 301, 10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123143 Clay, 2016, National Assessment of the Fragmentation Levels and Fragmentation-Class Transitions of the Forests in Mexico for 2002, 2008 and 2013, Forests, 7, 48, 10.3390/f7030048 Consejo Nacional de Población (CONAPO). 2007. Índice de marginación a nivel localidad 2005 [in line]. Primera edición: julio de 2007. Available in: <http://www.conapo.gob.mx>. México. Consejo Nacional de Población (CONAPO). 2012. Índice de marginación por localidad 2010 [on line]. Primera edición: enero de 2012. Available in: <http://www.conapo.gob.mx>. México. Cubbage, 2015, Community forestry enterprises in Mexico: Sustainability and competitiveness, Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 34, 623, 10.1080/10549811.2015.1040514 Ellis, 2008, Is community-based forest management more effective than protected areas?: A comparison of land use/land cover change in two neighboring study areas of the Central Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico, Forest Ecology and Management, 256, 1971, 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.07.036 2012 2016, 125 García-López, 2013, Scaling up from the grassroots and the top down: The impacts of multi-level governance on community forestry in Durango, Mexico, International Journal of the Commons, 7, 406, 10.18352/ijc.437 Gelo, 2015, Contingent valuation of community forestry programs in Ethiopia: Controlling for preference anomalies in double-bounded CVM, Ecological Economics, 114, 79, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.014 Honey-Rosés, 2009, Illegal logging in common property forests, Society and Natural Resources, 22, 916, 10.1080/08941920903131120 Hosonuma, 2012, An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries, Environmental Research Letters, 7, 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044009 Instituto Nacional de Geografía e Informática (INEGI). 2009. Guía Para la Interpretación de la Cartografía uso del Suelo y Vegetación, Escala 1:250,000 Serie III. INEGI, Aguascalientes, Mexico. Available online: http://www.inegi.org.mx/prod_serv/contenidos/espanol/bvinegi/productos/. Instituto Nacional de Geografía e Informática (INEGI). 2012. Guía Para la Interpretación de la Cartografía uso del Suelo y Vegetación, Escala 1:250,000 Serie IV. INEGI, Aguascalientes, México. p. 132. Available online: http://www.inegi.org.mx/prod _serv/contenidos/espanol/bvinegi/productos/geografia/publicaciones/guias-carto/sueloyveg/1_250_IV/1_250_IV.pdf (Accessed 1 August 2016). Instituto Nacional de Geografía e Informática (INEGI). 2017. Mosaico nacional de los terrenos rurales y sus principales características. Comunicado de prensa núm. 282/17 5 de julio de 2017 Ciudad de México. Available online http://www.inegi.org. mx/saladeprensa/boletines/2017/amca/. Kang, 2014, Forest cover changes in North Korea since the 1980s, Regional Environmental Change, 14, 347, 10.1007/s10113-013-0497-4 Kissinger, 2012 Kusel, 2001, Assessing well-being in forest dependent communities, Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 13, 359, 10.1300/J091v13n01_10 Larson, 2010, 3 Laverack, 2007, Building community capacity for locally managed ecotourism in Northern Thailand, Community Development Journal, 44, 172, 10.1093/cdj/bsm058 Lee, 2005 Macqueen, 2018, Innovations towards prosperity emerging in locally controlled forest business models and prospects for scaling up, World Development, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.004 Macqueen, 2012, Investing in locally controlled forestry: A review of TFD’s initiative on investing in locally controlled forestry 2009–2012, A TFD Publication, 7, 67 p McCarthy, 2006, Neoliberalism and the politics of alternatives: Community Forestry in British Columbia and the United States, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96, 84, 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00500.x Monterroso, 2017 Moreno-Sanchez, 2012, National assessment of the fragmentation, accessibility and anthropogenic pressure on the forests in Mexico, Journal of Forestry Research, 23, 529, 10.1007/s11676-012-0293-x Nhem, 2018, Policy implications for community-managed forestry in Cambodia from experts’ assessments and case studies of community forestry practice, Journal of Mountain Science, 15, 2531, 10.1007/s11629-018-5021-3 Ojha, 2016, Delocalizing communities: Changing forms of community engagement in natural resources governance, World Development, 87, 274, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.06.017 Ostrom, 2009, A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems, Science, 325, 419, 10.1126/science.1172133 Pagdee, 2006, What makes community forest management successful: A meta-study from community forests throughout the world, Society and Natural resources, 19, 33, 10.1080/08941920500323260 Peres, 2006, Detecting anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 227, 10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.007 Persha, 2011, Social and ecological synergy: Local rulemaking, forest livelihoods, and biodiversity conservation, Science, 331, 1606, 10.1126/science.1199343 Pokharel, 2007, Community forestry: Conserving forests, sustaining livelihoods and strengthening democracy, Journal of Forest and Livelihood, 6, 8 Ponce-Reyes, 2012, Vulnerability of cloud forest reserves in Mexico to climate change, Nature Climate Change, 2, 448, 10.1038/nclimate1453 2013 Rodríguez-Salazar, 2015, La creación del PROCYMAF como estrategia de apoyo al desarrollo forestal comunitario en México, 119 Rosenbaum, 1983, The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects, Biometrika, 70, 41, 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 Rossi, 2003 Ruiz-Castillo, 2009, Pobreza relativa y absoluta: el caso de México (1992–2004), El Trimestre Económico, 67 Sayer, 2008, 16 Segura-Warnholtz, 2014, Quince años de políticas públicas para la acción colectiva en comunidades forestales, Revista mexicana de sociología, 76, 105 Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT), 2004. Evaluación del Proyecto de Conservación y Manejo Sustentable de Recursos Forestales en México. Informe Final 2003. Coyoacán, México, D.F. Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT), 2005. Evaluación del Programa de Desarrollo Forestal Comunitario 2004. PROCYMAF II. Coyoacán, México, D.F. Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). 2011. Evaluación complementaria del ejercicio de los programas U005 y U006. Informe final de resultados. Coyoacán, México, D.F. Seymour, 2014, 61 Shackleton, 2007, The importance of dry woodlands and forests in rural livelihoods and poverty alleviation in South Africa, Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 558, 10.1016/j.forpol.2006.03.004 Shrestha, 2008, The politics of community participation in natural resource management: Lessons from Community Forestry in Nepal, Australian Forestry, 71, 135, 10.1080/00049158.2008.10676280 Simpson, 2003, Community capacity building: Starting with people not projects, Community Development Journal, 38, 277, 10.1093/cdj/38.4.277 Soille, 2009, Morphological segmentation of binary patterns, Pattern Recognition Letters, 30, 456, 10.1016/j.patrec.2008.10.015 Stuart, 2010, Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward, Statistical science: A review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 25, 1, 10.1214/09-STS313 Sunderlin, 2005, Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: An overview, World Development, 33, 1383, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.004 Tacconi, 2007, Decentralization, forest and livelihoods: Theory and narrative, Global Environmental Change, 338, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.002 Taylor, 2000, Producing more with less? Community Forestry in Durango, Mexico in an era of trade liberalization, Rural Sociology, 65, 253, 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2000.tb00028.x Thompson, 2013, An operational framework for defining and monitoring forest degradation, Ecology & Society, 18, 10.5751/ES-05443-180220 Torres-Rojo, 2015, Características de los núcleos agrarios forestales en México, 15 Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM) (2003). Evaluación externa del proyecto conservación y manejo sustentable de los recursos forestales en México (PROCYMAF). Informe final 2002. México, D.F. Vachon, B., Coallier, F., Rodríguez, F., Pérez, L. 2001. El desarrollo local, teoría y práctica: reintroducir lo humano en la lógica de desarrollo. Trea. Vega, 2014, Transaction cost theory of the firm and Community Forestry enterprises, Forest Policy and Economics, 42, 1, 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.01.006 Vega, 2016, Agents or stewards in community forestry enterprises? Lessons from the Mayan Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala, Land Use Policy, 52, 255, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.016 Vega, 2016, Transaction costs and the organization of CFEs: Experiences from ejidos in Quintana Roo, Mexico, Forest Policy and Economics, 70, 1, 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.011 2003 Viana, 2012, 72 Villa-Rojas, 2012, Notas sobre la tenencia de la tierra entre los mayas de la antigüedad, Estudios de cultura maya, 1, 21, 10.19130/iifl.ecm.1961.1.196 Wade, 1988 Wade, 2003, Distribution and causes of global forest fragmentation, Conservation Ecology, 7, 10.5751/ES-00530-070207 Warman, 1985, Notas para una redefinición de la comunidad agraria, Revista Mexicana de sociología, 5, 10.2307/3540490 Wilshusen, 2005, Community adaptation or collective breakdown? The emergence of ‘work groups’ in two forestry ejidos in Quintana Roo, Mexico, 151 World Bank (2005). Generación de ingresos y protección social para los pobres. Informe Ejecutivo. Washington: Banco Internacional de Reconstrucción y Fomento/Banco Mundial. 2 vol. World Bank (2009). Implementation Completion and Results Report. United Mexican States. Second Community Forestry Project. Reporte ICR00001093. Wunder, 2001, Poverty alleviation and tropical forests—what scope for synergies?, World Development, 29, 1817, 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00070-5