Effect of a Dynamic Fixation Construct on Syndesmosis Reduction: A Cadaveric Study
Tóm tắt
To explore what effect a dynamic fixation construct would have on the final reduction of the syndesmosis.
Syndesmotic ligaments were sectioned in 10 cadaveric specimens. The syndesmosis was intentionally malreduced with a clamp, and the distance from the anterior edge of the fibula to the anterior incisura of the tibia was measured to quantify the sagittal syndesmotic displacement (SSD). A 3.5-mm quadricortical screw was then placed, the clamp was removed, and the SSD measured. The clamp was then replaced, and a suture-button construct (Knotless Tightrope; Arthrex Inc, Naples, FL) was then placed through the bone tunnel, the clamp was again removed, and the SSD was measured.
In all cases, the fibula reduced to within 1 mm of its native anatomical position with the dynamic construct. The static screw construct, however, maintained an identical SSD measurement as the clamped malreduction. The dynamic suture-button construct reliably improved the SSD (
Our study demonstrates that dynamic fixation constructs can help restore anatomical alignment in the case of syndesmotic malreduction. The size difference between the suture diameter and drill hole effectively allows the fibula to be pulled and seated into the tibial incisura fibularis. These findings should not be viewed as a justification to ignore the syndesmotic reduction; however, they do validate an important benefit of dynamic fixation that has been found in the recent clinical literature.
Therapeutic Level III.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Sagi, 2012, The functional consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a minimum 2-year follow-up, J Orthop Trauma., 26, 439, 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31822a526a
Levin, 1998, The effect of fibular malreduction on contact pressures in an ankle fracture malunion model, J Bone Joint Surg Am., 80, 1395, 10.2106/00004623-199809000-00023
Harper, 1984, Instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis after bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fractures, J Bone Joint Surg Am., 66, 1319, 10.2106/00004623-198466080-00028
Naqvi, 2012, Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries: comparison of tightrope fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy of syndesmotic reduction, Am J Sports Med., 40, 2828, 10.1177/0363546512461480
Weening, 2005, Predictors of functional outcome following transsyndesmotic screw fixation of ankle fractures, J Orthop Trauma., 19, 102, 10.1097/00005131-200502000-00006
Westermann, 2014, The effect of suture-button fixation on simulated syndesmotic malreduction: a cadaveric study, J Bone Joint Surg Am., 96, 1732, 10.2106/JBJS.N.00198
Cherney, 2016, Incisura morphology as a risk factor for syndesmotic malreduction, Foot Ankle Int., 37, 748, 10.1177/1071100716637709
Boszczyk, 2018, Correlation of incisura anatomy with syndesmotic malreduction, Foot Ankle Int., 39, 369, 10.1177/1071100717744332
Höcker, 1989, The fibular incisure of the tibia. The cross-sectional position of the fibula in distal syndesmosis, Unfallchirurg., 92, 401
Ebraheim, 1998, The fibular incisure of the tibia on CT scan: a cadaver study, 1998 study, Foot Ankle Int., 19, 318, 10.1177/107110079801900509
Mccollum, 2013, Syndesmosis and deltoid ligament injuries in the athlete, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc., 21, 1328, 10.1007/s00167-012-2205-1
Peter, 1994, Biomechanical effects of internal fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmotic joint: comparison of two fixation techniques, J Orthop., 8, 215, 10.1097/00005131-199406000-00006
Rasmussen, 1982, Distal tibiofibular ligaments. Analysis of function, Acta Orthop Scand., 53, 681, 10.3109/17453678208992276
Scranton, 1976, Dynamic fibular function: a new concept, Clin Orthop., 118, 76
Schon, 2017, A 3-D CT analysis of screw and suture-button fixation of the syndesmosis, Foot Ankle Int., 38, 208, 10.1177/1071100716673590
Thornes, 2005, Suture-button syndesmosis fixation: accelerated rehabilitation and improved outcomes, Clin Orthop Relat Res., 431, 207, 10.1097/01.blo.0000151845.75230.a0
Laflamme, 2015, A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing clinical outcomes of patients treated surgically with a static or dynamic implant for acute ankle syndesmosis rupture, J Orthop Trauma., 29, 216, 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000245
Klitzman, 2010, Suture-button versus screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a biomechanical analysis, Foot Ankle Int., 31, 69, 10.3113/FAI.2010.0069
Hart, 1987, Healing of the medial collateral ligament in rats. The effects of repair, motion, and secondary stabilizing ligaments, J Bone Joint Surg Am., 69, 1194, 10.2106/00004623-198769080-00013
Soin, 2009, Suture-button versus screw fixation in a syndesmosis rupture model: a biomechanical comparison, Foot Ankle Int., 30, 346, 10.3113/FAI.2009.0346
Clanton, 2017, Biomechanical comparison of 3 current ankle syndesmosis repair techniques, Foot Ankle Int., 38, 200, 10.1177/1071100716666278
Gardner, 2006, Malreduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures, Foot Ankle Int., 27, 788, 10.1177/107110070602701005
Kocadal, 2016, Evaluation of reduction accuracy of suture-button and screw fixation techniques for syndesmotic injuries, Foot Ankle Int., 37, 1317, 10.1177/1071100716661221
Baek, 2018, Radiographic change of the distal tibiofibular joint following removal of transfixing screw fixation, Foot Ankle Int., 39, 318, 10.1177/1071100717745526
Song, 2014, The effect of syndesmosis screw removal on the reduction of the distal tibiofibular joint: a prospective radiographic study, Foot., 35, 543, 10.1177/1071100714524552