Effect of Woody Biomass Gasification Process Conditions on the Composition of the Producer Gas

Sustainability - Tập 13 Số 21 - Trang 11763
Alejandro Lyons Cerón1, Alar Konist1, Heidi Lees1, Oliver Järvik1
1Department of Energy Technologies, Tallinn University of Technology, 12616 Tallinn, Estonia

Tóm tắt

Using woody biomass in thermochemical gasification can be a viable alternative for producing renewable energy. The type of biomass and the process parameters influence the producer gas composition and quality. This paper presents research on the composition of the producer gas from the gasification of three woody biomass species: spruce, alder, and pine. The experiments were conducted in a drop-tube reactor at temperatures of 750, 850, and 950 °C, using air as the gasifying agent, with equivalence ratios of 0.38 and 0.19. Gas chromatography with a thermal conductivity detector was used to determine the composition of the producer gas, while the production of total organic compounds was detected using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. All three wood species exhibited very similar producer gas composition. The highest concentration of combustible gases was recorded at 950 °C, with an average of 4.1, 20.5, and 4.6 vol% for H2, CO, and CH4, respectively, and a LHV ranging from 4.3–5.1 MJ/m3. The results were in accordance with other gasification studies of woody species. Higher temperatures enhanced the composition of the producer gas by promoting endothermic and exothermic gasification reactions, increasing gas production while lowering solid and tar yields. The highest concentrations of combustible gases were observed with an equivalence ratio of 0.38. Continuous TOC measurement allowed understanding the evolution of the gasification process and the relation between a higher production of TOC and CO as the gasification temperature raised.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

IRENA (2017). REthinking Energy 2017: Accelerating the Global Energy Transformation, IRENA.

IEA (2020). Energy Atlas World Energy Statistics & World Energy Balances, IEA.

International Renewable Energy Agency (2020). National Renewably Energy Action Plan (NREAP) 2020, International Renewable Energy Agency.

Republic of Estonia Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (2017). National Development Plan of the Energy Sector until 2030.

Statistics Estonia Eesti Statistika Kvartalikiri (2021, August 01). 2/18. Quarterly Bulletin of Statistics Estonia—Statistics Estonia. Available online: https://www.stat.ee/sites/default/files/2020-07/Quarterly_Bulletin_2-2018.pdf.

Strezov, V., and Evans, T.J. (2014). Biomass Processing Technologies, CRC Press.

Ahmad, 2016, Assessing the gasification performance of biomass: A review on biomass gasification process conditions, optimization and economic evaluation, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 53, 1333, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.030

Higman, C., and van der Burgt, M. (2008). Gasification, Gulf Professional Publishing. [2nd ed.].

Sansaniwal, 2017, Recent advances in the development of biomass gasification technology: A comprehensive review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 72, 363, 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.038

Sepe, 2016, Assessing biomass steam gasification technologies using a multi-purpose model, Energy Convers. Manag., 129, 216, 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.10.018

Zhang, 2010, Overview of recent advances in thermo-chemical conversion of biomass, Energy Convers. Manag., 51, 969, 10.1016/j.enconman.2009.11.038

Costa, 2017, Modelling approaches to biomass gasification-review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 74, 71, 10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.027

Ruiz, 2013, Biomass gasification for electricity generation: Review of current technology barriers, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 18, 174, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.021

Mahinpey, 2016, Review of gasification fundamentals and new findings: Reactors, feedstock, and kinetic studies, Chem. Eng. Sci., 148, 14, 10.1016/j.ces.2016.03.037

Pachapur, V.L., Kutty, P., Pachapur, P., Brar, S.K., Le Bihan, Y., Galvez-Cloutier, R., and Buelna, G. (2019). Seed Pretreatment for Increased Hydrogen Production Using Mixed-Culture Systems with Advantages over Pure-Culture Systems. Energies, 12.

Cao, L., Yu, I.K., Xiong, X., Tsang, D.C., Zhang, S., Clark, J.H., Hu, C., Ng, Y.H., Shang, J., and Ok, Y.S. (2020). Biorenewable hydrogen production through biomass gasification: A review and future prospects. Environ. Res., 186.

Hu, 2019, Investigation of Biomass Gasification Potential in Syngas Production: Characteristics of Dried Biomass Gasification Using Steam as the Gasification Agent, Energy Fuels, 34, 1033, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b02701

He, 2021, Soot formation during biomass gasification: A critical review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 139, 110710, 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110710

Wijayanta, 2012, Optimized combustion of biomass volatiles by varying O2 and CO2 levels: A numerical simulation using a highly detailed soot formation reaction mechanism, Bioresour. Technol., 110, 645, 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.068

Ferreiro, 2020, Modelling soot formation during biomass gasification, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 134, 110380, 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110380

Sulg, 2021, Characterization of different wood species as potential feedstocks for gasification, Agron. Res., 19, 276

Chhiti, 2011, Wood Bio-Oil Noncatalytic Gasification: Influence of Temperature, Dilution by an Alcohol and Ash Content, Energy Fuels, 25, 345, 10.1021/ef101247m

Cascante Cirici, P. (2019). Biomass and Oil Shale Co-Pyrolysis. [Master’s Thesis, Tallinn University of Technology].

Proto, 2016, Energetic Characteristics of Syngas Obtained from Gasification of Hazelnut Prunings, Procedia—Soc. Behav. Sci., 223, 835, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.288

Demirbas, 2010, Characterization of Bio-oils from Spruce Wood (Picea orientalisL.) via Pyrolysis. Energy Sources Part A Recover, Util. Environ. Eff., 32, 909

Branca, 2014, Effects of the Torrefaction Conditions on the Fixed-Bed Pyrolysis of Norway Spruce, Energy Fuels, 28, 5882, 10.1021/ef501395b

Formowitz, B. (2010, January 3–7). Pyrolysis behavior of modified grey alder wood samples by TG-MS and TGA technoques. Proceedings of the 18th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, Lyon, France.

Suttibak, 2015, Production of Bio-oil from Pine Sawdust by Rapid Pyrolysis in a Fluidized-bed Reactor, Energy Sources Part A Recover. Util. Environ. Eff., 37, 1440

Purevsuren, 2018, Pyrolysis of pine wood and characterisation of solid and liquid products, Mong. J. Chem., 19, 24, 10.5564/mjc.v19i45.1086

Sethuraman, 2011, Producer Gas Composition and NOx Emissions from a Pilot-Scale Biomass Gasification and Combustion System Using Feedstock with Controlled Nitrogen Content, Energy Fuels, 25, 813, 10.1021/ef101352j

Inayat, 2018, Effect of Blending Ratio on Quality of Producer Gas From Co-Gasification of Wood and Coconut Residual, MATEC Web Conf., 225, 05005, 10.1051/matecconf/201822505005

Joka, 2016, Methane rich gasification of wood pellets, E3S Web Conf., 10, 00031, 10.1051/e3sconf/20161000031

Poskrobko, 2016, Gasification of waste wood biomass, Drewno, 59, 241, 10.12841/wood.1644-3985.C25.21

Brynda, 2020, Wood chips gasification in a fixed-bed multi-stage gasifier for decentralized high-efficiency CHP and biochar production: Long-term commercial operation, Fuel, 281, 118637, 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118637

Chaurasia, 2016, Modeling, simulation and optimization of downdraft gasifier: Studies on chemical kinetics and operating conditions on the performance of the biomass gasification process, Energy, 116, 1065, 10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.037

Mohammed, 2011, Air gasification of empty fruit bunch for hydrogen-rich gas production in a fluidized-bed reactor, Energy Convers. Manag., 52, 1555, 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.10.023

Bhatia, S. (2014). 18. Biomass Gasification. Advanced Renewable Energy Systems, Woodhead Publishing India PVT.

Huang, 2019, Investigation of biomass (pine wood) gasification: Experiments and Aspen Plus simulation, Energy Sci. Eng., 7, 1178, 10.1002/ese3.338

Almeida, 2019, Effect of temperature on the gasification of olive bagasse particles, J. Energy Inst., 92, 153, 10.1016/j.joei.2017.10.012

Halim, 2020, Effect of Gasification Temperature on Synthesis Gas Production and Gasification Performance for Raw and Torrefied Palm Mesocarp Fibre, ASEAN J. Chem. Eng., 19, 120

Yahaya, 2019, Effect of particle size and temperature on gasification performance of coconut and palm kernel shells in downdraft fixed-bed reactor, Energy, 175, 931, 10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.138

Yii, 2019, The Effect of Operating Temperature and Equivalence Ratio in an Entrained Flow Gasification of EFB, Mater. Today Proc., 19, 1373, 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.155

Zeng, 2018, Study on the Characteristics of the Influence of Temperature and Excess air ratio effect on Waste Gasification Syngas, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 199, 032094, 10.1088/1755-1315/199/3/032094

Taba, 2012, The effect of temperature on various parameters in coal, biomass and CO-gasification: A review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 16, 5584, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.06.015

Franco, 2003, The study of reactions influencing the biomass steam gasification process, Fuel, 82, 835, 10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00313-7

Sikarwar, 2016, An overview of advances in biomass gasification, Energy Environ. Sci., 9, 2939, 10.1039/C6EE00935B

Wang, 2008, Contemporary issues in thermal gasification of biomass and its application to electricity and fuel production, Biomass Bioenergy, 32, 573, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.12.007

Couto, 2013, Influence of the Biomass Gasification Processes on the Final Composition of Syngas, Energy Procedia, 36, 596, 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.068