Effect of Total Knee Arthroplasty Implant Position on Flexion Angle Before Implant-Bone Impingement
Tài liệu tham khảo
Rodricks, 2007, Press-fit condylar design total knee arthroplasty. Fourteen- to seventeen-year follow-up, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 89, 89, 10.2106/JBJS.E.00492
Vessely, 2006, The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: long-term survivorship and failure modes of 1000 cemented condylar total knee arthroplasties, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 452, 28, 10.1097/01.blo.0000229356.81749.11
Kanekasu, 2004, Fluoroscopic analysis of knee arthroplasty kinematics during deep flexion kneeling, J Arthroplasty, 19, 998, 10.1016/j.arth.2004.03.012
Weiss, 2002, What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements?, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 404, 172, 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00030
Bellemans, 2002, Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 84, 50, 10.1302/0301-620X.84B1.12432
Bellemans, 2005, The influence of tibial slope on maximal flexion after total knee arthroplasty, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 13, 193, 10.1007/s00167-004-0557-x
D'Lima, 2008, In vivo contact stresses during activities of daily living after knee arthroplasty, J Orthop Res, 26, 1549, 10.1002/jor.20670
Sharma, 2007, High-flexion TKA designs: what are their in vivo contact mechanics?, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 464, 117, 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318157e478
Argenson, 2005, In vivo kinematic evaluation and design considerations related to high flexion in total knee arthroplasty, J Biomech, 38, 277, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.027
Kim, 2005, Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87, 1470, 10.2106/JBJS.D.02707
Ritter, 2003, Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clustering, log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85-A, 1278, 10.2106/00004623-200307000-00014
Walker, 2007, Factors affecting the impingement angle of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacements: a laboratory study, J Arthroplasty, 22, 745, 10.1016/j.arth.2006.09.008
Massin, 2006, Optimization of the posterior condylar offset, tibial slope, and condylar roll-back in total knee arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 21, 889, 10.1016/j.arth.2005.10.019
Walker, 1991, Range of motion in total knee arthroplasty. A computer analysis, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 262, 227, 10.1097/00003086-199101000-00031
Goldstein, 2006, Why posterior cruciate-retaining and substituting total knee replacements have similar ranges of motion. The importance of posterior condylar offset and cleanout of posterior condylar space, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 88, 182, 10.2106/JBJS.F.00588
Kim, 2009, Functional outcome and range of motion of high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining and high-flexion posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 91, 753, 10.2106/JBJS.H.00805
Martin, 2006, Two-year outcomes of computed tomography-based and computed tomography free navigation for total knee arthroplasties, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 449, 275, 10.1097/01.blo.0000218738.69247.d8
Tang, 2005, Sagittal bowing of the distal femur in Chinese patients who require total knee arthroplasty, J Orthop Res, 23, 41, 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.06.013
Yehyawi, 2007, Variances in sagittal femoral shaft bowing in patients undergoing TKA, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 464, 99, 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318157e4a2
Dennis, 1998, In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 356, 47, 10.1097/00003086-199811000-00009
Nozaki, 2002, Observations of femoral rollback in cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 404, 308, 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00046
Stiehl, 1995, Fluoroscopic analysis of kinematics after posterior cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 77, 884, 10.1302/0301-620X.77B6.7593100
Dennis, 1998, Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions, J Arthroplasty, 13, 748, 10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90025-0