Effect of Robotics on Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Self-Efficacy, Science Learning, and Computational Thinking
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adedokun OA, Bessenbacher AB, Parker LC, Kirkham LL, Burgess WD (2013) Research skills and STEM undergraduate research students’ aspirations for research careers: mediating effects of research self-efficacy. J Res Sci Teach 50(8):940–951
Altin H, Pedaste M (2013) Learning approaches to applying robotics in science education. J Balt Sci Educ 12(3):365–377
Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84(2):191
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In: Ramachaudran V. S. (ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4). Academic Press, New York, pp. 71–81. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998)
Bandura A (2006) Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents 5:307–337
Barker BS, Ansorge J (2007) Robotics as means to increase achievement scores in an informal learning environment. J Res Technol Educ 39(3):229–243
Barker BS, Nugent G, Grandgenett NF (2014) Examining fidelity of program implementation in a STEM-oriented out-of-school setting. Int J Technol Des Educ 24(1):39–52
Benitti FBV (2012) Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: a systematic review. Comput Educ 58(3):978–988
Bernard HR (2012) Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks, London
Bers MU, Portsmore M (2005) Teaching partnerships: early childhood and engineering students teaching math and science through robotics. J Sci Educ Technol 14(1):59–73
Brown SD, Lent RW (2006) Preparing adolescents to make career decisions: a social cognitive perspective. In: Perjares F, Urdan T (eds), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Connecticut: Information Age, Greenwich, pp 201–223
Bybee R (2010) Advancing STEM education: a 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher 70(1):30–35
Chung CC, Cartwright C, Cole M (2014) Assessing the impact of an autonomous robotics competition for STEM education. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 15(2):24
Denis B, Hubert S (2001) Collaborative learning in an educational robotics environment. Comput Hum Behav 17(5):465–480
Epstein D, Miller RT (2011) Slow off the mark: elementary school teachers and the crisis in science, technology, engineering, and math education. Center for American Progress, Washington, DC
Grover S, Pea R (2013) Computational thinking in K–12: a review of the state of the field. Educ Res 42(1):38–43
Karp T, Maloney P (2013) Exciting young students in grades K-8 about STEM through an afterschool robotics challenge. Am J Eng Educ 4(1):39–54
Kazakoff ER, Sullivan A, Bers MU (2013) The effect of a classroom-based intensive robotics and programming workshop on sequencing ability in early childhood. Early Childhood Educ J 41(4):245–255
Kim C, Kim D, Yuan J, Hill RB, Doshi P, Thai CN (2015) Robotics to promote elementary education preservice teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Comput Educ 91:14–31
Lindh J, Holgersson T (2007) Does lego training stimulate pupils’ ability to solve logical problems? Comput Educ 49(4):1097–1111
Mioduser D, Levy ST, Talis V (2009) Episodes to scripts to rules: concrete-abstractions in kindergarten children’s explanations of a robot’s behavior. Int J Technol Des Educ 19(1):15–36
Nadelson LS, Callahan J, Pyke P, Hay A, Dance M, Pfiester J (2013) Teacher STEM perception and preparation: inquiry-based STEM professional development for elementary teachers. J Educ Res 106(2):157–168
National Science and Technology Council (2013) Federal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (stem) education 5-year strategic plan. Committee on STEM Education National Science and Technology Council, Washington, DC
NGSS (2013) Next generation science standards. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/
Nugent G, Barker B, Grandgenett N, Adamchuk VI (2010) Impact of robotics and geospatial technology interventions on youth STEM learning and attitudes. J Res Technol Educ 42(4):391–408
Nugent G, Barker B, Welch G, Grandgenett N, Wu C, Nelson C (2015) A model of factors contributing to STEM learning and career orientation. Int J Sci Educ 37(7):1067–1088
Ortiz AM, Bos B, Smith S (2015) The power of educational robotics as an integrated STEM learning experience in teacher preparation programs. J Coll Sci Teach 44(5):42–47
Papanikolaou K, Frangou S, Alimisis D (2008) Teachers as designers of robotics-enhanced projects: the TERECoP course in Greece. In: Proceedings of the SIMPAR 2008 conference/workshop: teaching with robotics: didactic approaches and experiences. University of Padova, Padua, Italy, pp. 100–111
Park J (2015) Effect of robotics-enhanced inquiry-based learning in elementary science education. J Comput Math Sci Teach 34(1):71–95
Perrenet J, Kaasenbrood E (2006) Levels of abstraction in students’ understanding of the concept of algorithm: the qualitative perspective. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 38(3), 270–274
Perrenet J, Groote JF, Kaasenbrood E (2005) Exploring students’ understanding of the concept of the algorithm: levels of abstraction. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin (Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 64–68). ACM
Renninger KA, Hidi S (2011) Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educ Psychol 46(3):168–184
Robinson M (2005) Robotics-driven activities: can they improve middle school science learning. Bull Sci Technol Soc 25(1):73–84
Rogers C, Portsmore MD (2004) Bringing engineering to elementary school. Journal of STEM Education 5(3 &4):17–28
Rohaan EJ, Taconis R, Jochems WM (2012) Analysing teacher knowledge for technology education in primary schools. Int J Technol Des Educ 22(3):271–280
Sanders ME (2008) STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. Technol Teach 68(4):20–26
Schoon KJ, Boone WJ (1998) Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preservice elementary teachers. Sci Educ 82(5):553–568
Sinay E, Jaipal-Jamani K, Nahornick A, Douglin M (2016) STEM teaching and learning in the Toronto District School Board: towards a strong theoretical foundation and scaling up from initial implementation of the K-12 STEM strategy. Research Series I. (Research Report No. 15/16-16) 200pp. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Toronto District School Board
Slangen L, van Keulen H, Gravemeijer K (2011) What pupils can learn from working with robotic direct manipulation environments. Int J Technol Des Educ 21(4):449–469
Soodak LC, Wodell DM (1996) Teacher efficacy: toward the understanding of a multi-faceted construct. Teach Teach Educ 12(4):401–411
Sullivan FR (2008) Robotics and science literacy: thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding. J Res Sci Teach 45(3):373–394
Sullivan FR, Heffernan J (2016) Robotic construction kits as computational manipulatives for learning in the STEM disciplines. J Res Technol Educ 48(2):105–128
Tai RH, Liu CQ, Maltese AV, Fan X (2006) Planning early for careers in science. Life Sci 1:0–2
The Royal Society Science Policy Centre (2014). Vision for science and mathematics education. The Royal Society, London, UK
Tschannen-Moran M, Hoy AW (2007) The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teach Teach Educ 23(6):944–956
Tytler R, Osborne J, Williams G, Tytler K, Cripps Clark J (2008) Opening up pathways: engagement in STEM across the primary-secondary school transition. Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, Canberra
van Merriënboer JJ (1997) Training complex cognitive skills: a four-component instructional design model for technical training. Educational Technology Publications, New Jersey
Vedder-Weiss D, Fortus D (2012) Adolescents’ declining motivation to learn science: a follow-up study. J Res Sci Teach 49(9):1057–1095
Velthuis C, Visser P, Pieters J (2014) Teacher training and preservice primary teachers’ self-efficacy for science teaching. J Sci Teach Educ 25(4):445–464
Wang X (2013) Why students choose STEM majors motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. Am Educ Res J 50(5):1081–1121
Watters JJ, Ginns IS (2000) Developing motivation to teach elementary science: effect of collaborative and authentic learning practices in preservice education. J Sci Teach Educ 11(4):301–321
Weintrop D, Beheshti E, Horn M, Orton K, Jona K, Trouille L, Wilensky U (2016) Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. J Sci Educ Technol 25(1):127–147
Wigfield A, Cambria J (2010) Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Dev Rev 30:1–35
Williams D, Ma Y, Prejean L, Ford MJ (2007) Acquisition of physics content knowledge and scientific inquiry skills in a robotics summer camp. J Res Technol Educ 40:201–216
Wing JM, (2010) Computational thinking: what and why? Retrieved from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~CompThink/resources/TheLinkWing.pdf
Yadav A, Mayfield C, Zhou N, Hambrusch S, Korb JT (2014) Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(1), article 5. 1–16. doi: 10.1145/25