Effect of Preoperative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Oncologic and Functional Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy

Tyson, 2016, Radical prostatectomy trends in the United States: 1998 to 2011, Mayo Clin Proc, 91, 10, 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.09.018 Campbell, 2017, Optimum tools for predicting clinical outcomes in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of prognostic accuracy and validity, J Urol, 197, E900, 10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.2371 National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2021. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf. Hovels, 2008, The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in the staging of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis, Clin Radiol, 63, 387, 10.1016/j.crad.2007.05.022 de Rooij, 2016, Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer: a diagnostic meta-analysis, Eur Urol, 70, 233, 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.029 Li, 2020, Tumour location determined by preoperative MRI is an independent predictor for positive surgical margin status after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, BJU Int, 126, 152, 10.1111/bju.15060 Diamand, 2021, External validation of a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based nomogram for the prediction of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 79, 180, 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.037 Nyarangi-Dix, 2020, Combined clinical parameters and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of extraprostatic disease—a risk model for patient-tailored risk stratification when planning radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol Focus, 6, 1205, 10.1016/j.euf.2018.11.004 Kozikowski, 2019, Clinical utility of MRI in the decision-making process before radical prostatectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis, PLoS One, 14, e0210194, 10.1371/journal.pone.0210194 Lee, 2017, Can Urol Assoc J, 11, E174, 10.5489/cuaj.4211 Gietelink, 2022, Preoperative multiparametric MRI does not lower positive surgical margin rate in a large series of patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, J Robot Surg, 16, 273, 10.1007/s11701-020-01184-2 Kukreja, 2020, Impact of preoperative prostate magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of high-risk prostate cancer, Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 23, 172, 10.1038/s41391-019-0171-0 Schiavina, 2018, MRI displays the prostatic cancer anatomy and improves the bundles management before robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, J Endourol, 32, 315, 10.1089/end.2017.0701 Panebianco, 2012, Use of multiparametric MR with neurovascular bundle evaluation to optimize the oncological and functional management of patients considered for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, J Sex Med, 9, 2157, 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02794.x Park, 2014, Influence of magnetic resonance imaging in the decision to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles at robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, J Urol, 192, 82, 10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.005 Hricak, 2004, The role of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision regarding whether to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy, Cancer, 100, 2655, 10.1002/cncr.20319 McClure, 2012, Use of MR imaging to determine preservation of the neurovascular bundles at robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, Radiology, 262, 874, 10.1148/radiol.11103504 Nguyen, 2017, The risks and benefits of cavernous neurovascular bundle sparing during radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis, J Urol, 198, 760, 10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.3344 Anceschi, 2022, Analysis of predictors of early trifecta achievement after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for trainers and expert surgeons: the learning curve never ends, Minerva Urol Nephrol, 74, 133, 10.23736/S2724-6051.22.04805-4