Educational equity and teacher discretion effects in high stake exams

Burgess, 2013, Test scores, subjective assessment, and stereotyping of ethnic minorities, Journal of Labor Economics, 31, 535, 10.1086/669340 Dee, 2016, The causes and consequences of test score manipulation: evidence from the new york regents examinations Diamond, 2016, The long-term consequences of teacher discretion in grading of high-stakes tests Hanna, 2012, Discrimination in grading, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4, 146 Jacob, 2005, Accountability, incentives and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago public schools, Journal of Public Economics, 89, 761, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.08.004 Kuhlemeier, 2012, De praktijk van de eerste en tweede correctie van het CSE. Verslag van een landelijke enquête Kuhlemeier, 2013, De Praktijk van eerte en tweede correctie. Samenvatting van onderzoek naar het functioneren van het CSE Lavy, 2008, Do gender stereotypes reduce girls’ or boys’ human capital outcomes? evidence from a natural experiment, Journal of Public Economics, 92, 2083, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.02.009 McCrary, 2008, Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test, Journal of Econometrics, 142, 698, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.005 McMillan, J. H., & Nash, S. (2000). Teacher classroom assessment and grading practices decision making. Neal, 2013, The consequences of using one assessment system to pursue two objectives., Journal of Economic Education, 44, 339, 10.1080/00220485.2013.825112 Schuurs, 2017, De invloed van het lt-examenverslag op de scores, Levende Talen Tijdschrift, 18, 25