Educational Robotics as a boundary object: Towards a research agenda

Laura Malinverni1, Cristina Valero2, Marie Monique Schaper3, Isabel Garcia de la Cruz4
1Visual Arts and Design Department, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
2Information and Communication Technologies Department, University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
3Centre for Computational Thinking and Design, University Aarhus, Aathus, Denmark
4Association CosiCosa, Barcelona, Spain

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ackermann, E. K. (2000). Relating to things that think animated toys, artificial creatures, V-Avatars. In Magazine : The European network for intelligent information interfaces (pp. 2–5). Alessandri, 2012, Educational robotics: Robotics from fantasy medium to medium for fantasy, Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 8, 71 Alimisis, 2013, Educational robotics : Open questions and new challenges, Themes in Science & Technology Education, 6, 63 Alimisis, A. D., & Kynigos, C. (2009). Constructionism and robotics in education. In Teacher education on robotic-enhanced constructivist pedagogical methods (pp. 11–26). Anwar, 2019, A systematic review of studies on educational robotics, Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 9, 10.7771/2157-9288.1223 Aran-Ramspott, 2013, The notion of violence in television fiction: Children’s interpretation, Comunicar: Revista Cientifica de Comunicación y Educacióń, 20, 155, 10.3916/C40-2013-03-06 Awad, 2018, The moral machine experiment, Nature, 563, 59, 10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6 Barad, 2003, Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28, 801, 10.1086/345321 Barendregt, 2018, Intermediate-level knowledge in child-computer interaction, 699 Barone, T., & Eisner, E. (1997). Arts-based educational research. In Complementary methods for research in education (pp. 75–115). Bartlett, B., Estivill-Castro, V., & Seymon, S. (2004). Dogs or robots - why do children see them as robotic pets rather than canine machines? BT - fifth australasian user interface conference (AUIC2004). In Conferences in research and practice in information technology, vol. 28 (pp. 7–14). Bartneck, 2004, From fiction to science – A cultural reflection on social robots, Robotics, 1 Bascou, 2016, Robotics in K-12 formal and informal learning environments: A review of literature Benitti, 2012, Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review, Computers and Education, 58, 978, 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006 Beran, 2011, Can children have a relationship with a robot?, 49, 10.1007/978-3-642-19385-9_7 Blancas, 2017, Analyzing children’s expectations from robotic companions in educational settings, 749 Boraita, 2020, Developing a critical robot literacy for Young people from conceptual metaphors analysis Braidotti, 2015 Bruckenberger, 2013, The good, the bad, the weird: Audience evaluation of a real robot in relation to science fiction and mass media, 301 Buechley, 2008, The LilyPad Arduino: Toward wearable engineering for everyone, IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7, 12, 10.1109/MPRV.2008.38 Bumby, 1999, Investigating children’s attitudes towards robots: A case study, 391 Cavallo, D., Papert, S., Sipitakiat, A., Basu, A., Bryant, S., Welti-Santos, L., & Ackermann, E. RoBallet: Exploring Learning through Expression in the Arts through Constructing in a Technologically Immersive Environment. International Conference of the Learning Sciences, (2014), 105–112. Cekiso, 2013, Gender stereotypes in selected fairy tales: Implications for teaching reading in the foundation phase in South Africa, Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 04, 201, 10.1080/09766634.2013.11885597 Charisi, 2017, Children’s views on identification and intention communication of self-driving vehicles, 399 Clark, 2005, Listening to and involving young children: A review of research and practice, Early Child Development and Care, 175, 489, 10.1080/03004430500131288 Collard, Anne-Sophie, Henry, Julie, Hernalesteen, Alyson, Jacques, Jerry, & Frenay, B. P. (2020). De-constructing media-fueled conceptions on artificial intelligence by playing who’s who?. In Proceedings of media education summitt 2020. Eglash, 2013, Broadening participation toward culturally responsive computing education, Communications of the ACM, 56, 33, 10.1145/2483852.2483864 Goode, 2012, Beyond curriculum: the exploring computer science program, ACM Inroads, 3, 47, 10.1145/2189835.2189851 Hannon, 2016, Gender and status in voice user interfaces, Interactions, 23, 34, 10.1145/2897939 Hernandez, 2008, La investigación basada en las artes. Propuestas para repensar la investigación en educación, Education Siglo XXI, 26, 85 Hoök, 2012, Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 19, 1, 10.1145/2362364.2362371 Jewitt, 2013, Multimodal methods for researching digital technologies, 250 Kafai, 2014, Ethnocomputing with electronic textiles: Culturally responsive open design to broaden participation in computing in American Indian youth and communities, 241 Kress, 2010 Kynigos, 2008, Black-and-white-box perspectives to distributed control and constructionism in learning with robotics controlling and environment constructing robots as a, Autonomous Robots, 1 Lammer, 2015, The 5-step plan: A holistic approach to investigate children’s ideas on future robotic products, 69 Liu, 2010, Early adolescents’ perceptions of educational robots and learning of robotics, British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 44, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00944.x Maguth, 2012, In defense of the social studies: social studies programs in STEM education, Social Studies Research & Practice, 7, 65, 10.1108/SSRP-02-2012-B0005 Malinverni, 2020, Relating to materials in digital fabrication: Transform materials to transform yourself, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100166 Oliveira, D., Ferreira, S., Celestino, H., Ferreira, S., & Abrantes, P. (2012). Uma proposta de ensino-aprendizagem de programação utilizando robótica educativa e storytelling. In II congresso internacional TIC e educação (pp. 2567–2576). Payne, 2019 Payne, 2019, Empowering children through algorithmic justice education, Journal of Design and Science Precel, 2012, The effect of constructing a robot’s behavior on young children’s conceptions of behaving artifacts and on their Theory of Mind (ToM) and Theory of Artificial Mind (ToAM), Children, Youth, Environments Journal, 1 Qi, 2015, Crafting technology with circuit stickers, 438 Riek, L. D., & Howard, D. (2014). A code of ethics for the human-robot interaction profession. In We robot conference (pp. 1–10). Rusk, 2008, New pathways into robotics: Strategies for broadening participation, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 59, 10.1007/s10956-007-9082-2 Ryoo, 2013, Democratizing computer science knowledge: Transforming the face of computer science through public high school education, Learning, Media and Technology, 38, 161, 10.1080/17439884.2013.756514 Searle, 2015, Boys’ needlework: understanding gendered and indigenous perspectives on computing and crafting with electronic textiles, 31 Silver, J., Rosenbaum, E., & Shaw, D. (2012). Makey makey: improvising tangible and nature-based user interfaces beginner’s mind collective. In Proceedings of the sixth international conference on tangible, embedded and embodied interaction (pp. 367–370). Star Leigh, 1989, Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, Social Studies of Science, 19, 387, 10.1177/030631289019003001 Sullins, J. P. (2015). Applied professional ethics for the reluctant roboticist. In The emerging policy and ethics of human-robot interaction workshop. Sullivan, 2018, Dancing robots: integrating art, music, and robotics in Singapore’s early childhood centers, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28, 325, 10.1007/s10798-017-9397-0 Turkle, 1992, Epistemological pluralism: Styles and voices within the computer culture, Humanistic Mathematics Network Journal, 1, 46, 10.5642/hmnj.199201.07.08 Vakil, 2018, Equity in computer science education, Harvard Educational Review, 88, 26, 10.17763/1943-5045-88.1.26 Vakil, 2019, Education it’s about power, Communications of the ACM, 62, 31, 10.1145/3306617 Villani, 2018 Woods, 2006, Exploring the design space of robots: Children’s perspectives, Interactive Computing, 18, 1390, 10.1016/j.intcom.2006.05.001 Zawieska, K. (2020). Roboethics as a research puzzle. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), (731726) (pp. 612–613).