Education biases perception of social robots

European Review of Applied Psychology - Tập 70 - Trang 100521 - 2020
R. Szczepanowski1, E. Cichoń2,1, K. Arent3, J. Sobecki4, P. Styrkowiec5, M. Florkowski6, M. Gakis7
1College of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Education, University of Lower Silesia, Wroclaw, Poland
2WSB University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland
3Department of Cybernetics and Robotics, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland
4Department of Computer Science and Systems Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland
5Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland
6Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Psychology and Sociology, University of Zielona Gora, Zielona Gora, Poland
7SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wrocław Faculty of Psychology, Wroclaw, Poland

Tài liệu tham khảo

Allport, 1954 Arent, 2017, Toward emotion recognition embodied in social robots: implementation of Laban movement analysis into NAO robot, Journal of Automation Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems, 11, 3, 10.14313/JAMRIS_4-2017/31 Aronson, 1966, Similarity versus liking as determinants of interpersonal attractiveness, Psychonomic Science, 5, 157, 10.3758/BF03328329 Bargh, 1996, The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditional automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 104, 10.1006/jesp.1996.0005 Bartneck, 2009, My robotic doppelgänger — A critical look at the Uncanny Valley, 269 Bartneck, 2009, Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots, International Journal of Social Robotics, 1, 71, 10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3 Bohner, 2002 Bornstein, 1989, Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987, Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265, 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265 Breazeal, 2002 Breazeal, 2004, Social Interactions in HRI: The Robot View, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 34, 181, 10.1109/TSMCC.2004.826268 Breazeal, 2008, Social robots that interact with people Breazeal, 2016, Social robotics, 1935, 10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_72 Dautenhahn, 2007, Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human–robot interaction, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362, 679, 10.1098/rstb.2006.2004 Dautenhahn, 2007, Methodology & themes of human-robot interaction: A growing research field, International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 4, 103, 10.5772/5702 De Houwer, 2007, A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning, The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 230, 10.1017/S1138741600006491 Destephe, 2015, Walking in the uncanny valley: Importance of the attractiveness on the acceptance of a robot as a working partner, Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00204 Disalvo, 2002, All robots are not equal: The design and perception of humanoid robot heads, 321 Duffy, 2003, Anthropomorphism and the social robot, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 177, 10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00374-3 Erica, Robots, (n.d.) Your Guide to the World of Robotics (n.d). (Retrieved November 10, 2019, from https://www.robots.ieee.org/robots/erica/). Eyssel, 2012, Activating elicited agent knowledge: How robot and user features shape the perception of social robots, 851 Eyssel, 2015, Predictors of psychological anthropomorphization, mind perception, and the fulfillment of social needs: A case study with a zoomorphic robot, 827 Fazio, 1989, The role of attitude accessibility in the attitude-to-behavior process, Journal of Consumer research, 16, 280, 10.1086/209214 Fazio, 1982, Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 339, 10.1016/0022-1031(82)90058-0 Flash, Robots, (n.d.) Your Guide to the World of Robotics (n.d). (Retrieved November 10, 2019, from https://www.robots.ieee.org/robots/flash/). Fong, 2003, A survey of socially interactive robots, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 143, 10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00372-X Goetz, 2003, 55 Jibo, Robots, (n.d.) Your Guide to the World of Robotics (n.d). (Retrieved November 10, 2019, from https://www.robots.ieee.org/robots/jibo/). Keepon, Robots, (n.d.) Your Guide to the World of Robotics (n.d). (Retrieved November 10, 2019, from https://www.robots.ieee.org/robots/keepon/). Kim, 2013, The effects of familiarity and robot gesture on user acceptance of information, 159 Kismet, Robots, (n.d.) Your Guide to the World of Robotics (n.d). (Retrieved November 10, 2019, from https://www.robots.ieee.org/robots/kismet/). Lee, 2005, Can a robot be perceived as a developing creature?, Human Communication Research, 31, 538 Mianowski, 2016, Robot humanoidalny ROMAN [Robot Roman–Humanoid for Expression Emotions], Pomiary Automatyka Robotyka, 20, 37, 10.14313/PAR_219/37 Mori, 1970, Bukimi no tani [The uncanny valley], Energy, 7, 33 Mori, 2005 Mori, 2012, The uncanny valley, IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 19, 98, 10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811 Moodley, 2017 Mutlu, 2006, Perceptions of ASIMO: an exploration on co-operation and competition with humans and humanoid robots, 351 Nass, 1994 Nass, 2000, Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers, Journal of Social Issues, 56, 81, 10.1111/0022-4537.00153 Nisbett, 1977, The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 250, 10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250 Nomura, 2006 Paro, (n.d.) Your Guide to the World of Robotics (n.d). (Retrieved November 10, 2019, from https://www.robots.ieee.org/robots/paro/). Pepper, (n.d.) Your Guide to the World of Robotics (n.d). (Retrieved November 10, 2019, from https://www.robots.ieee.org/robots/pepper/). Pettigrew, 2006, A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751, 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751 Piçarra, 2015, Validation of the Portuguese version of the Negative Attitudes towards Robots Scale, Revue Européenne De Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 65, 93, 10.1016/j.erap.2014.11.002 Piçarra, 2016, Making sense of social robots: A structural analysis of the laypersons social representation of robots, European Review of Applied Psychology, 66, 277, 10.1016/j.erap.2016.07.001 Pochwatko, 2015, Polish Version of the Negative Attitude Toward Robots Scale (NARS-PL), Journal of Automation Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems, 9, 65, 10.14313/JAMRIS_3-2015/25 Robins, 2006, Does appearance matter in the interaction of children with autism with a humanoid robot?, Interaction Studies, 7, 479, 10.1075/is.7.3.16rob Sarowski, 2017, Robot społeczny — wprowadzenie do zagadnienia [Social robot: introduction to the subject], Roczniki Kulturoznawcze, 8, 75, 10.18290/rkult.2017.8.1-4 Share, 2018, Preparing for a Robot Future? Social Professions, Social Robotics and the Challenges Ahead, Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies, 18, 44 Sputnik (n.d.). (Retrieved November 10, 2019 from a manufacturer's website http://www.drrobot.com/products_item.asp?itemNumber=SPUTNIK). Szczepanowski, 2017 TNS Opinion and Social, 2012 Turner, 2017 Walters, 2008 Zajonc, 2001, 464