Economists in the PITS?

Bedeian AG (2006) The manuscript review process: the proper roles of authors, referees, and editors. In: Baruch Y, Sullivan S, Schepmyer H (eds) Winning reviews: a guide for evaluating scholarly writing. Palgrave MacMillan, London, pp 104–116

Bedford NM (1978) The impact of a priori theory and research on accounting practice. In: Abdel-Khalik AR, Keller T (eds) The impact of accounting research on practice and disclosure. Duke University Press, Durham, pp 2–31

Bénabou R, Tirole J (2003) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Rev Econ Stud 70(3):489–520

Black D, Brown S, Day A, Race P (1998) 500 tips for getting published: a guide for educators, researchers and professionals. Taylor & Francis Group, London

Colander D, Föllmer H, Haas A, Goldberg M, Juselius K, Kirman A, Lux T, Sloth B (2009) The financial crisis and the systematic failure of academic economists. Kiel Working Paper 1489, Kiel Institute for the World Economy

Daniel HD (1993) Guardians of science: fairness and reliability of peer reviews. Wiley, Weinheim

Dyckman TR, Gibbins M, Swieringa RJ (1978) Experimental and survey research in financial accounting: a review and evaluation. In: Abdel-Khalik AR, Keller T (eds) The impact of accounting research on practice and disclosure. Duke University Press, Durham, pp 48–105

Ellison G (2002) Evolving standards for academic publishing: a q-r theory. J Polit Econ 110(5):994–1034

Evans JA (2008) Electronic publication and the narrowing of science and scholarship. Science 321:395–399

Frank RH (2001) Higher education: the ultimate winner-take-all market? In: Devlin M, Meyerson J (eds) Exploring the future of higher education, forum futures 2000 papers, Forum Strategy Series, vol 3. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 2–12

Frank RH (2004) Are arms races in higher education a problem? In: Devlin M (ed) Publications from the Forum for the Future of Higher Education. Forum for the Future of Higher Education, Cambridge, pp 49–42

Frey BS (1997) Not just for the money. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

Frey BS (2003) Publication as prostitution. Public Choice 116:205–223

Frey BS (2006) How influential is economics? De Economist 154(2):1–17

Frey BS, Eichenberger R, Frey RL (2009) Editorial ruminations: publishing Kyklos. Kyklos 62:151–160

Gans JS, Shepard GB (1994) How are the mighty fallen: rejected classic articles by leading economists. J Econ Perspect 8:165–180

Gigerenzer G (2002) Calculated risk. Simon & Schuster/Penguin, New York

Gigerenzer G (2007) Gut feelings. Penguin/Viking, New York

Gillies D (2008) How should research be organized? College Publications, London

Gladwell M (2005) Blink. The power of thinking without thinking. Little, Brown and Company, New York

Hewstone M, Stroebe W (2008) Moving at a snail’s pace: some observations on the publication process in social psychology. Mimeo, Department of Psychology, University of Utrecht

Holmström B, Milgrom P (1991) Multi-task principal agent analysis: incentive contracts, asset ownership and job design. J Law Econ Organ 7:24–52

Kaplan RS (1978) Information content of financial accounting numbers: a survey of empirical evidence. In: Abdel-Khalik AR, Keller T (eds) The impact of accounting research on practice and disclosure. Duke University Press, Durham, pp 134–173

Laband DN, Tollison RD (2003) Dry holes in economic research. Kyklos 56:161–174

Lazear E (1995) Personnel economics. MIT Press, Cambridge

Lazear E, Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J Polit Econ 89(5):841–864

Lee FS (2006) The ranking game, class, and scholarship in American mainstream economics. Mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Missouri

Merton RK (1973) Sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Miller CC (2006) Peer review in the organizational and management sciences: prevalence and effects on reviewer hostility, bias, and dissensus. Acad Manag J 49:425–431

Moizer P (2009) Publishing in accounting journals: a fair game? Acc Organ Soc 34(2):285–304

Osterloh M, Frey BS (2009a) Are more and better indicators the solution? Scand J Manag 25:225–227

Osterloh M, Frey BS (2009b) The role of incentives for academic research. Integrating to different perspectives. Mimeo, Institute of Organization and Administrative Sciences, University of Zurich

Oswald AJ (2007) An examination of the reliability of prestigious scholarly journals: evidence and implications for decision-makers. Economica 74:21–31

Oswald AJ (2009) World-leading research and its measurement. Warwick economic research papers, no. 887

Peters DP, Ceci SJ (1982) Peer-review practices of psychological journals: the fate of published articles, submitted again. Behav Brain Sci 5:187–255

Polanyi M (1967) Science and reality. Br J Philos Sci 18(3):177–196

Posner RA (2002) Public intellectuals: a study of decline. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

Prendergast C (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. J Econ Lit 37:7–63

Prüfer J, Zetland D (2007) An auction market for journal articles. CentER discussion paper 2007-79

Raelin JA (2008) Refereeing the game of peer review. Acad Manag Learn Educ 7(1):124–129

Starbuck WH (2005) How much better are the most prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication. Organ Sci 16:180–200

Starbuck WH (2006) The production of knowledge. The challenge of social science research. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Sullivan JB (1993) The impact of auditing research on auditing practice. Audit J Pract Theory 12:1–2

Tsang EWK, Frey BS (2007) The as-is journal review process: let authors own their ideas. Acad Manag Learn Educ 6(1):128–136

Weingart P (2005) Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: inadvertent consequences. Scientometrics 62:117–131