Economics and Law of Works of Art in the Single European Market
Tóm tắt
This paper is concerned with the economic analysis of the European rules on the circulation of works of art. After reviewing the relevant literature, an economic framework of the international circulation of works of art is provided (social goals, efficiency and distributive aspects, an economic rationale for a general free trade rule integrated by selective protectionism). Using this framework the European system of circulation of works of art—resulting from the combination of the Maastricht Treaty with Regulation 3911/92 and Directive 93/7—is analysed. The main results of the analysis are: 1) the general free trade principle ruling the Single European Market is strongly limited by rules protecting national artistic heritages of member states; 2) this protectionism—working towards countries both outside and inside the European Union—is applied according to the national laws of each member state, while, contrary to what the Maastricht Treaty would call for, an artistic heritage of European significance is not defined and no autonomous role is recognized in this field to European Institutions; 3) this system shows some inconsistencies with economic theory, as strict limits to trade are not provided when they should be required by the preservation of the physical or artistic integrity of works of art, while in other cases an unduly restrained trade may derive from highly protectionist national laws and export-licencing policies of member states. Enforcement provisions are also analysed and some proposals to improve the system are advanced.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bator, P.M. (1982). The International Trade in Art. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Also as “An Essay on the International Trade in Art.” Stanford Law Review, n. 34.
Directive 93/7: “Council Directive 93/7/EEC” of 15 March 1993, Official Journal of the European Communities, n. L 74 of 27 March 1993.
European Parliament (1990): “Resolution” n. A3–324/90 of 13 December 1990.
Forte, F. (1996). “Towards European Market of Art and Culture Goods. Some Proposals.” In M. Hutter and A. T. Peacock (eds.), Economic Perspectives of Cultural Heritage. London: Macmillan.
Frey, B.S., and Pommerehne, W.W. (1987). “International Trade in Art: Attitudes and Behaviour.” Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali, n. 6, 465–486. Also as chapter 8 in: Frey, B.S. and Pommerehne, W.W. (1989). Muses and Markets, Blackwell. A further version is: Pommerehne, W.W. and Frey, B.S. (1992). Justification for Art Trade Restrictions: The Economic Perspectives, Discussion Paper B9205, Dept. Economics, Univ. Saarland.
Maastricht Treaty (1992): Council of the European Communities, Treaty on European Union, signed in Maastricht on 7 February 1992.
Regulation 3911/92: “Council Regulation (EEC) n. 3911/92” of 9 December 1992, Official Journal of the European Communities, n. L 395 of 31 December 1992.
Scitovsky T. (1972). “What's Wrong with the Arts Is What's Wrong with Society.” American Economic Review May, 62–69.
Singer L. (1978). “Microeconomics of Art Markets.” Journal of Cultural Economics December, 21–39.