Economic evaluation of ion-exchange processes for nutrient removal and recovery from municipal wastewater
Tóm tắt
Ion exchange (IEX) processes are a promising alternative to remove and recover nutrients from municipal wastewater. To assess the feasibility and viability of IEX processes for full-scale application, this study aimed at providing an evaluation of performance and economics on upscaling these processes for two different configurations in a 10,000 population equivalent wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) and compared them with a traditional biological nutrient removal (BNR) plant. The IEX processes were designed based on existing pilot-scale data, and after aerobic or anaerobic carbon removal stages. The nutrients were recovered from spent regenerants in the form of (NH4)2SO4 and hydroxyapatite Ca5(PO4)3(OH), allowing regenerant reuse. The 40-year whole life cost (WLC) of IEX coupled with traditional activated sludge processes was estimated to be ~£7.4 M, and WLC of IEX coupled with anaerobic membrane process was estimated to be £6.1 M, which was, respectively, 17% and 27% less than the traditional BNR based WWTP. Furthermore, ~98 tonnes of (NH4)2SO4 and 3.4 tonnes of Ca3(PO4)2 could be recovered annually. The benefits of lower costs, reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient recovery aligned with circular economy, illustrated that IEX processes are attractive for nutrient removal and recovery from municipal wastewater.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
EEC Council. 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment. Off. J. Eur. Communities 40–52 (1991). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX:31991L0271.
Koppelaar, R. H. E. M. & Weikard, H. P. Assessing phosphate rock depletion and phosphorus recycling options. Glob. Environ. Chang 23, 1454–1466 (2013).
Sikosana, M. K. L. N., Randall, D. G. & von Blottnitz, H. A technological and economic exploration of phosphate recovery from centralised sewage treatment in a transitioning economy context. Water SA 43, 343–353 (2017).
Bott, C. B., Parker, D. S., Jimenez, J., Miller, M. W. & Neethling, J. B. WEF/WERF study of BNR plants achieving very low N and P limits: Evaluation of technology performance and process reliability. Water Sci. Technol. 65, 808–815 (2012).
Pabalan, R. T. & Bertetti, F. P. Cation-exchange properties of natural zeolites. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 45, 453–518 (2001).
Canellas, J. Tertiary Ammonium Removal With Zeolites (Cranfield University, 2018).
Guida, S., Rubertelli, G., Huang, X., Jefferson, B. & Soares, A. Phosphorus and ammonia removal and recovery through ion exchange (IEX) process at demonstration scale. in 16th IWA leading Edge Conference on Water and Wastewater Technologies (LET2019) (Edinburgh, 2019).
Martin, B. D. et al. Quantifying the performance of a hybrid anion exchanger/adsorbent for phosphorus removal using mass spectrometry coupled with batch kinetic trials. Environ. Technol. 0, 1–11 (2017).
Muhammad, A., Soares, A. & Jefferson, B. The impact of background wastewater constituents on the selectivity and capacity of a hybrid ion exchange resin for phosphorus removal from wastewater. Chemosphere 224, 494–501 (2019).
Martin, B. D., Parsons, S. A. & Jefferson, B. Removal and recovery of phosphate from municipal wastewaters using a polymeric anion exchanger bound with hydrated ferric oxide nanoparticles. Water Sci. Technol. 60, 2637–2645 (2009).
Latimer, R. et al. Towards a Renewable Future: Assessing Resource Recovery as a Viable Treatment Alternative State of the Science and Market Assessment. Water Intelligence Online. vol. 15 (IWA, London, 2016).
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Design Manual: Phosphorus Removal EPA/625.1-87/001 (1987).
Longo, S. et al. Monitoring and diagnosis of energy consumption in wastewater treatment plants. A state of the art and proposals for improvement. Appl. Energy 179, 1251–1268 (2016).
Tchobanoglous, G., Stensel, H. D., Tsuchihashi, R. & Burton, F. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery (McGraw-Hill Education, 2014).
Zhang, Z., Lin, R., Jin, R. & Zhao, Q. Wastewater Engineering. Vol. 2 (China Architecture & Building Press, 2015).
Baek, K. W. et al. Adsorption kinetics of boron by anion exchange resin in packed column bed. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 13, 452–456 (2007).
Wang, K. M. et al. Identification of gas sparging regimes for granular anaerobic membrane bioreactor to enable energy neutral municipal wastewater treatment. J. Memb. Sci. 555, 125–133 (2018).
Wijnja, H. & Schulthess, C. P. Vibrational spectroscopy study of selenate and sulfate adsorption mechanisms on Fe and Al (Hydr)oxide surfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 229, 286–297 (2000).
Pretel, R., Robles, A., Ruano, M. V., Seco, A. & Ferrer, J. The operating cost of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) treating sulphate-rich urban wastewater. Sep. Purif. Technol. 126, 30–38 (2014).
Envrionmental Agency. Review of best practice in treatment and reuse/recycling of phosphorus at wastewater treatment works (2012).
Zhan, X., Hu, Z. & Wu, G. Greenhouse Gas Emission and Mitigation in Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants (IWA Publishing, 2018).
Chai, C., Zhang, D., Yu, Y., Feng, Y. & Wong, M. S. Carbon footprint analyses of mainstream wastewater treatment technologies under different sludge treatment scenarios in China. Water (Switz.) 7, 918–938 (2015).
Hao, X., Li, J., Li, S. & Cao, D. Nitrogen recovery from wastewater: no benefit in economy. China water wastewater 33, 28–33 (2017).
Tanabe, Y. & Nishibayashi, Y. Developing more sustainable processes for ammonia synthesis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 257, 2551–2564 (2013).
Desmidt, E. et al. Global phosphorus scarcity and full-scale P-recovery techniques: a review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 336–384 (2015).
Hao, X., Zhou, J., Wang, C. & van Loosdrect, M. New Product of Phosphorus Recovery - Vivianite. Acta Sci. Circumstantiae (2018).
Tan, X., Tan, S. P., Teo, W. K. & Li, K. Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) hollow fibre membranes for ammonia removal from water. J. Memb. Sci. 271, 59–68 (2006).
Latimer, R., Rohrbacher, J., Nguyen, V., Khunjar, W. O. & Jeyanayagam, S. Towards a Renewable Future: Assessing Resource Recovery as a Viable Treatment Alternative Case Studies of Facilities Employing Extractive Nutrient Recovery Technologies (WERF Research Report Series, 2015).
Thornton, A., Pearce, P. & Parsons, S. A. Ammonium removal from solution using ion exchange on to MesoLite, an equilibrium study. J. Hazard. Mater. 147, 883–889 (2007).
Cookney, J. et al. Dissolved methane recovery from anaerobic effluents using hollow fibre membrane contactors. J. Memb. Sci. 502, 141–150 (2016).
Wang, K. M., Soares, A., Jefferson, B. & McAdam, E. J. Comparable membrane permeability can be achieved in granular and flocculent anaerobic membrane bioreactor for sewage treatment through better sludge blanket control. J. Water Process Eng. 28, 181–189 (2019).
Towler, G. & Sinnott, R. Chemical Engineering Design Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013).
Wang, K. M., Jefferson, B., Soares, A. & McAdam, E. J. Sustaining membrane permeability during unsteady-state operation of anaerobic membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment following peak-flow. J. Memb. Sci. 564, 289–297 (2018).
Gouveia, J., Plaza, F., Garralon, G., Fdz-Polanco, F. & Peña, M. Long-term operation of a pilot scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) for the treatment of municipal wastewater under psychrophilic conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 185, 225–233 (2015).
Deng, Q., Dhar, B. R., Elbeshbishy, E. & Lee, H. S. Ammonium nitrogen removal from the permeates of anaerobic membrane bioreactors: Economic regeneration of exhausted zeolite. Environ. Technol. 35, 2008–2017 (2014).
European Union. Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme Project: Scale-up of low-carbon footprint material recovery techniques in existing wastewater treatment plants (2016).
Alibaba. Chemical product price enquiry. www.alibaba.com (2018).
Ofwat. Appendix 1: Sludge treatment, transport and disposal—supporting evidence and design options Water 2020: Regulatory framework for wholesale markets and the 2019 price review (2015).