Economic analysis of nature preservation investments: the zonal travel cost approach applied for Harghita County of Romania

Environmental and Ecological Statistics - Tập 21 - Trang 83-93 - 2013
Eugen Mitrică1, Bianca Mitrică2, Andrei Stănculescu1
1The Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania
2Institute of Geography, Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania

Tóm tắt

The paper is focused on the cost of travel method and specific issues involved by the use of this method for monetization of benefits provided by nature preservation investment projects. Usually, nature preservation investment projects are non revenue generator projects and consequently the monetization of benefits provided is essential in the process of analysis and valuation of these projects, because benefits are the only positive effects able to counterbalance the investment costs. Therefore, the main interest and particularity of the cost-benefit analysis of nature preservation investment projects consists in identification and monetization of the benefits. In the following paper, the method of zonal travel cost is used for indicative valuation of the direct benefits of an investment project for nature preservation, in Harghita County of Romania, as an opportunity and pre-feasibility study completed before making the initial investment decision.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Cavatassi R (2004) Valuation methods for environmental benefits in forestry and watershed investment projects. ESA working paper 04(01):1–33 Chen W, Hong H, Liu Y, Zhang L, Hou X, Raymond M (2004) Recreation demand and economic value: an application of travel cost method for Xiamen Island. China Econ Rev 15:398–406 European Commission—Guidance on the methodology for carrying out cost benefit analysis—Working Document No. 4 Fleming CM, Cook A (2008) The recreational value of Lake McKenzie, Fraser Island: an application of the travel cost method. Tourism Manag 29:1197–1205 Freeman AM (1991) Valuing environmental resources under alternative management regimes. Ecol Econ 3:247–256 Greenley DA, Walsh RG, Young RA (1981) Option value: empirical evidence from a case study of recreation and water quality. Q J Econ 96(4):657–673 Krutilla JV (1967) Conservation reconsidered. Am Econ Rev 57(4):777–786 Markandya A (1998) The valuation of health impacts in developing countries. Planejamento e Politicas Publicas 1:119–155