Ecology, management, and conservation implications of North American beaver(Castor canadensis)in dryland streams

Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems - Tập 24 Số 3 - Trang 391-409 - 2014
Polly P. Gibson1, Julian D. Olden1
1School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Tóm tắt

ABSTRACT

After near‐extirpation in the early 20th century, beaver populations are increasing throughout many parts of North America. Simultaneously, there is an emerging interest in employing beaver activity for stream restoration in arid and semi‐arid environments (collectively, ‘drylands’), where streams and adjacent riparian ecosystems are expected to face heightened challenges from climate change and human population growth.

Despite growing interest in reintroduction programmes, surprisingly little is known about the ecology of beaver in dryland streams, and science to guide management decisions is often fragmented and incomplete.

This paper reviews the literature addressing the ecological effects and management of beaver activity in drylands of North America, highlighting conservation implications, distinctions between temperate and dryland streams, and knowledge gaps.

Well‐documented effects of beaver activity in drylands include changes to channel morphology and groundwater processes, creation of perennial wetland habitat, and substantial impacts to riparian vegetation. However, many hypothesized effects derived from temperate streams lack empirical evidence from dryland streams.

Topics urgently in need of further study include the distribution and local density of beaver dams; consequences of beaver dams for hydrology and water budgets; and effects of beaver activity on the spread of aquatic and riparian non‐native species.

In summary, this review suggests that beaver activity can create substantial benefits and costs for conservation. Where active beaver introductions or removals are proposed, managers and conservation organizations are urged to implement monitoring programmes and consider the full range of possible ecological effects and trade‐offs.

Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.3368/er.18.2.87

10.1002/eco.113

10.1007/s13157-011-0154-y

Apple LL, 1985, Investigations on Beavers, 123

BaileyV.1931.Mammals of New Mexico. United States Dept. of Agriculture Bureau of Biological Survey.

Baker BW, 2003, Wild Mammals of North America: Biology, Management, and Conservation, 288

10.1890/03-5237

10.1007/s10641-012-0041-2

10.1139/z01-162

10.1002/rra.696

10.1007/BF03160686

10.1525/bio.2010.60.11.7

CallMW.1970.Beaver pond ecology and beaver–trout relationships in southeastern Wyoming. PhD thesis University of Wyoming WY.

Carrillo C, 2009, An overview of historical beaver management in Arizona

CEC (Commission for Environmental Cooperation).1997.Ecological regions of North America. Commission for Environmental Cooperation Montreal Quebec.

10.1002/rra.2631

10.2307/1467897

10.3398/1527-0904(2008)68[365:IOBDDO]2.0.CO;2

10.1002/hyp.5965

Crawford CS, 1999, Rio Grande Ecosystems: Linking Land, Water, and People, 151

10.3955/0029-344X-82.4.309

10.2193/2008-065

10.1080/03632415.2012.687263

10.2307/3670335

FinchDM StolesonSH.2000.Status ecology and conservation of the southwestern willow flycatcher. USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Odgen UT.

FredlakeM.1997.Re‐establishment of North American beaver (Castor canadensis) into the San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area. US Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment EA no. AZ‐060–97‐004 Tucson AZ.

10.1894/MLK-07.1

10.2307/3672516

10.1002/aqc.2383

HallF.2005.Emigrant Creek cattle allotment: lessons from 30 years of photomonitoring. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland OR.

HarperBJ.2001.The ecological role of beavers (Castor canadensis) in a Southwestern desert stream. MS thesis University of Nevada NV.

Hoffmeister DF, 1986, Mammals of Arizona

10.1577/1548-8659(1998)127<0223:ROSIOF>2.0.CO;2

10.2307/3503787

JohnsonG.2011.Bird abundance and richness in a desert riparian area following beaver re‐introduction. PhD thesis University of Arizona AZ.

10.2307/1938297

10.1007/s10886-008-9496-1

10.2307/3801834

Knopf FL, 1988, Conservation of riparian ecosystems in the United States, The Wilson Bulletin, 100, 272

Lanman RB, 2012, The historical range of beaver in the Sierra Nevada: a review of the evidence, California Fish and Game, 98, 65

10.1002/hyp.5910

10.1139/b99-088

Lesica P, 2004, Beavers indirectly enhance the growth of Russian olive and tamarisk along eastern Montana rivers, Western North American Naturalist, 64, 93

LevickLR GoodrichDC HernandezM FonsecaJ SemmensDJ StrombergJC TluczekM LeidyRA ScianniM GuertinDP.2008.The ecological and hydrological significance of ephemeral and intermittent streams in the arid and semi‐arid American southwest. US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development and USDA/ARS Southwest Watershed Research Center.

LindJM.2002.A habitat suitability model for beavers (Castor canadensis) in an arid environment using Geographic Information Systems (GIS). MS thesis Central Washington University WA.

10.1007/s00267-005-0204-4

LowryMM.1993.Groundwater elevations and temperature adjacent to a beaver pond in central Oregon. MS thesis Oregon State University OR.

MacFarlaneWW WheatonJM.2013.Modeling the capacity of riverscapes to support dam‐building beaver – case study: Escalante River Watershed. Ecogeomorphology and Topographic Analysis Lab Utah State University Logan UT.

10.1016/0043-1354(87)90204-1

10.1016/j.biocon.2005.08.003

10.1098/rspb.2012.2977

McComb WC, 1990, Dam‐site selection by beavers in an eastern Oregon basin, Great Basin Naturalist, 50, 273

10.1007/BF00379350

McKinstry MC, 2002, Survival, fates, and success of transplanted beavers, Castor canadensis, in Wyoming, Canadian Field‐Naturalist, 116, 60, 10.5962/p.363399

10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03660.x

MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2005, Ecosystems and human well‐being: current state and trends: findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 623

MedinDE ClaryWP.1990.Bird populations in and adjacent to a beaver pond ecosystem in Idaho. USDA Forest Service Ogden UT.

MedinDE ClaryWP.1991.Small mammals of a beaver pond ecosystem and adjacent riparian habitat in Idaho. USDA Forest Service Ogden UT.

Mellink E, 1998, Status of beavers (Castor canadensis) in Valle de Mexicali, Mexico, Bulletin Southern California Academy of Sciences, 97, 115

10.1894/0038-4909-57.3.343

10.1672/07-142.1

10.2307/1938681

10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00066-9

NolteDL LutmanMW BergmanDL ArjoWM PerryKR.2003.Feasibility of non‐lethal approaches to protect riparian plants from foraging beavers in North America. USDA National Wildlife Research Center Fort Collins CO.

ODFW (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife).1997.ODFW Aquatic Inventories Project stream habitat distribution coverages. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Corvallis OR.

Ogden PS, 1971, Peter Skene Ogden's Snake Country Journals, 1827–28 and 1828–29

PattersonBD CeballosG SechrestW TognelliMF BrooksT LunaL OrtegaP SalazarI YoungBE.2007.Digital distribution maps of the mammals of the Western Hemisphere version 3.0. NatureServe Arlington VA.

Pattie JO, 1905, The personal narrative of James O. Pattie of Kentucky

Pollock MM, 2003, The Ecology and Management of Wood in World Rivers, 213

10.1002/esp.1553

PollockMM WheatonJM BouwesN VolkC WeberN JordanCE.2012.Working with beaver to restore salmon habitat in the Bridge Creek Intensively Monitored Watershed: design rationale and hypotheses. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Seattle WA.

10.1139/F10-095

R Development Core Team.2011.R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna Austria.

10.1080/10641260500341379

10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00067.x

10.1073/pnas.1009734108

10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00032.x

10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02271.x

10.1006/jare.2001.0833

10.2307/2269558

TalabereAG.2002.Influence of water temperature and beaver ponds on Lahontan cutthroat trout in a high‐desert stream southeastern Oregon. MS thesis Oregon State University OR.

10.3398/064.071.0305

TappeDT.1942.The status of beavers in California. State of California Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Game Sacramento CA.

TrabuccoA ZomerRJ.2009.Global aridity index (Global‐Aridity) and global potential evapo‐transpiration (Global‐PET) geospatial database. CIGAR Consortium for Spatial Information.http://csi.cgiar.org/aridity/index.asp/[23 October 2012]

USFWS (US Fish and Wildlife Service).2002.Southwestern willow flycatcher recovery plan. US Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque NM.

USFWS (US Fish and Wildlife Service).2009.Arroyo toad (Bufo californicus) 5‐year review: summary and evaluation. US Fish and Wildlife Service Ventura CA.

USGS National Gap Analysis Program.2007.Digital animal‐habitat models for the Southwestern United States. New Mexico Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit New Mexico State University Las Cruces NM.

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.022

Weber DJ, 1971, The Taos Trappers: the Fur Trade in the Far Southwest, 1540–1846

10.1002/rra.1359

10.1577/T06-207.1

WildC.2011.Beaver as a climate change adaptation tool: concepts and priority sites in New Mexico. Seventh Generation Institute Santa Fe NM.

10.1080/07352680490514673