Eco-information and its effect on consumer values for environmentally certified forest products

Anderson, R., 2003. Do forest certification ecolabels impact consumer behavior? Presented at CINTRAFOR’S (Center for International Trade in Forest Products) 20th Annual International Forest Products Markets Conference, October 16–17, Seattle, WA. Auld, G., Cashore, B., Newsom, D., 2001. A look at forest certification through the eyes of United States wood and paper producers presented at the global initiatives and public policies. First International Conference on Private Forestry in the 21st Century, March 25–27, Atlanta, GA. Baharuddin, H.J., Simula, M., 1994. Certification Schemes for all Timber and Timber Products. International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, Japan. Bin, O., Polasky, S., 2002. Valuing coastal wetlands: a hedonic property price approach. Department of Economics, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC. Boyle, K.J., Teisl, M.F., 1999. Public perceptions for timber harvesting on private forest land purchased for public ownership in Maine. Maine Agriculture and Forest Experiment Station, Miscellaneous Report 414. Brown, 1987, Production and cost of scenic beauty, Forest Science, 33, 394 Cooksey, R.A., Howard, T.E., 1995. Willingness to pay to protect forest benefits with conservation easements. Presented at the IUFRO (International Union of Forestry Research Organizations) World Congress. August 6–12, Tampere, Finland. Dimitri, C., Greene, C., 2002. Organic Food Industry Taps Growing American Market Agricultural Outlook Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture. AGO-295, October. Donovan, G.H., Nicholls, D.L., 2003. Estimating Consumer Willingness to Pay a Price Premium for Alaska Secondary Wood Products. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station Research Paper PNW-RP-553, October. Forsyth, 1999, Will consumers pay more for certified wood products?, Journal of Forestry, 97, 18 Foster, 1989, Measuring welfare effects of product contamination with consumer uncertainty, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 17, 266, 10.1016/0095-0696(89)90020-X Garrod, 1996, The non-use benefits of enhancing forest biodiversity, Ecological Economics, 21, 45, 10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00092-4 Hanley, 1993, The contingent valuation of forest characteristics, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 44, 218, 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1993.tb00267.x Holmes, 2003, Attribute-based methods Hull, 1986, The scenic beauty temporal distribution method, Forest Science, 32, 271 Irland, L.C., 2002. The Elusive Green Premium Presented at the Sustainable Wood Supply through Market-Based Incentives Workshop, Orono, ME, May 17. Lippke, B., Bare, B., 1999. Cost and Compromise: Determining the Public's Willingness to Pay for Values Received from Forests. Center for International Trade in Forest Products. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington. Loomis, 1996, Measuring the economic benefits of removing dams and restoring the Elwha River, Water Resources Research, 32, 441, 10.1029/95WR03243 Loomis, 1996, How large is the extent of the market for public goods, Applied Economics, 28, 779, 10.1080/000368496328209 Mattsson, 1994, How do different forest management practices affect the non-timber value of forests? An economic analysis, Journal of Environmental Management, 41, 79, 10.1006/jema.1994.1035 Ozanne, 1998, Segmenting the market for environmentally certified wood products, Forest Science, 44, 379 Ozanne, 1997, Willingness to pay for environmentally certified wood products, Forest Products Journal, 47, 1 Ozanne, 1998, Environmental certification of wood products, Women in Natural Resources, 19, 4 Ozanne, 2003, Certification from the US consumer perspective, Forest Products Journal, 53, 13 Pate J., Loomis, J., 1997. The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California. Ecological Economics 20, 199–207. Plantinga, A.J., Teisl, M.F., Allen, T.G., Field, D., 2000. Developing a Tax/Subsidy Program to Encourage Environmentally Based Forest Certification. Report to the Maine Watch Institute, Augusta, ME. Ribe, 1990, A general model for understanding the perception of scenic beauty in northern Hardwood forests, Landscape Journal, 9, 86, 10.3368/lj.9.2.86 Rosenberger, R.S., Smith, E.L., 1997. Non market Economic Impacts of Forest Insect Pests: A Review of the Literature. General Technical Report. Pacific Southwest Research Station (Albany CA). USDA Forest Service. Rubin, J., Helfand, G., Loomis, J., 1991. A benefit cost analysis of the northern spotted Owl. Journal of Forestry, 25–30. Rudis, 1988, Forest inventory and management-based visual preference models of Southern Pine stands, Forest Science, 34, 846 Schroeder, 1981, Progress in predicting the perceived scenic beauty of forest landscapes, Forest Science, 27, 71 Sutherland, 1985, Effect of distance on the preservation of ware, Quality Land Economics, 61, 281, 10.2307/3145843 Teisl, 2003, What we may have is a failure to communicate, Forest Science, 49, 13 Teisl, M., Newman, F., Buono, J., Hermann, M., 2000. Designing Effective Environmental Labels for Forest Products: Results of Focus Group Research. Maine Agricultural Experiment Station Miscellaneous Report 420. Teisl, M., O’Brien, K., Peavey, S., 2001. Environmental labeling of wood products: what do consumers want to see? Proceedings of the National Association of Environmental Professionals 26th Annual Conference. Teisl, M., Roe, B., Levy, A.S., 2002a. Eco-labeling: what does consumer science tell us about which strategies work? Proceedings of the Tufts Conference on Eco-labeling, Boston. Teisl, 2002, Can eco-labels tune a market? Evidence from dolphin-safe labeling, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 43, 339, 10.1006/jeem.2000.1186 Teisl, 2001, Measuring the welfare effects of nutrition information, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83, 133, 10.1111/0002-9092.00142 Vlosky, R., Ozanne, L., 1998a. The value-chain for environmentally certified wood products: perceptions and attitudes of manufacturers, home center retailers, building contractors, architects and consumers. Proceedings Paper from Wood Technology Clinic and Show, pp. 1–5. Vlosky, R., Ozanne, L., 1998b. Eco-marketing: can certified products help expand your sales? Proceedings Paper from Wood Technology Clinic and Show, pp. 1–5. Vlosky, 1999, A conceptual model of US consumer willingness-to-pay for environmentally certified wood products, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16, 122, 10.1108/07363769910260498 Vlosky, R., Ozanne, L., Bigsby, H., 1999b. A Comparison of Consumer Wood Product Certification Perceptions and Attitudes—New Zealand and the United States. Working Paper ♯36. Louisiana Forest Products Laboratory Publication, LSU Agricultural Center. Waffle, R., 1994. Forest certification: who profits?: green certification in not needed for sustained forestry. Wood and Wood Products, 97–101.