Easy-to-Read Informed Consent Forms for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Clinical Trials
Tài liệu tham khảo
Comprehensive Working Group on Informed Consent in Cancer Clinical Trials for the National Cancer Institute: Recommendations for the Development of Informed Consent Documents for Cancer Clinical Trials. NCI, NIH Publication No. 98-4355, 1998. Available at: http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/understanding/simplification-of-informed-consent-docs (Accessed 3/19/2010).
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Human Research Protections. (November 2008). OHRP Informed Consent Frequently Asked Questions. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/informconsfaq.html (Accessed 7/1/2010).
45 CFR 46. 116: Protection of Human Subjects; Revised 6/18/1991.
Tait, 2005, Improving the readability and processability of a pediatric informed consent document: effect on parents’ understanding, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 159, 347, 10.1001/archpedi.159.4.347
Cox, 2002, Informed consent and decision-making: patients’ experiences of the process of recruitment to phases I and II anti-cancer drug trials, Patient Educ Couns, 46, 31, 10.1016/S0738-3991(01)00147-1
de Witte, 2000, Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and secondary acute myeloid leukaemias: a report on behalf of the Chronic Leukaemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), Br J Haematol, 110, 620, 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.02200.x
Foltz, 1996, Reading level, learning presentation preference, and desire for information among cancer patients, J Cancer Educ, 11, 32
Socie, 1999, Long-term survival and late deaths after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, N Engl J Med, 341, 14, 10.1056/NEJM199907013410103
Stevens, 2002, Ethical issues of informed consent: mothers’ experiences enrolling their children in bone marrow transplantation research, Cancer Nurs, 25, 81, 10.1097/00002820-200204000-00001
Weiss, 1992, Health status of illiterate adults: relation between literacy and health status among persons with low literacy skills, J Am Board Fam Pract, 5, 257
Singer, 1990, Informed consent for bone marrow transplantation: identification of relevant information by referring physicians, Bone Marrow Transplant, 6, 431
von Wagner, 2009, Health literacy and self-efficacy for participating in colorectal cancer screening: the role of information processing, Patient Educ Couns, 75, 352, 10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.015
Beardsley, 2007, Longer consent forms for clinical trials compromise patient understanding: so why are they lengthening?, J Clin Oncol, 25, 13, 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.3341
Davis, 1998, Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms, J Natl Cancer Inst, 90, 668, 10.1093/jnci/90.9.668
Berger, 2009, The length of consent documents in oncological trials is doubled in twenty years, Ann Oncol, 20, 379, 10.1093/annonc/mdn623
Coyne, 2003, Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, J Clin Oncol, 21, 836, 10.1200/JCO.2003.07.022
Doak, 2007
Davis, 2002, Health literacy and cancer communication, CA Cancer J Clin, 52, 134, 10.3322/canjclin.52.3.134
Institute for Healthcare Advancement. Health Literacy: Bridging Research and Practice. La Habra, CA: Institute for Healthcare Advancement. Available at: http://www.iha4health.org/ (Accessed 8/1/09).
Burman, 2001, Breaking the camel’s back: multicenter clinical trials and local institutional review boards, Ann Intern Med, 134, 152, 10.7326/0003-4819-134-2-200101160-00016
Simplification of Informed Consent Documents. National Cancer Institute, U.S. National Institutes of Health. Available at: http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/understanding/simplification-of-informed-consent-docs/page3 (Accessed 9/10/2010).
dos Santos Lonsdale, 2006, Reading in examination-type situations: the effects of text layout on performance, J Res Read, 29, 433, 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00317.x
Mayer, 2007
Foster, 1970, A study of the legibility of one- and two-column layouts for BPS publications, Bull Br Psychol Soc, 23, 113
Ralph, 1982, A geriatric visual concern: the need for publishing guidelines, J Am Optom Assoc, 53, 43
Guthrie, 1987, Distinctions between reading comprehension and locating information in text, J Edu Psychol, 79, 220, 10.1037/0022-0663.79.3.220
The Maine CDC Institutional Review Board. Suggestions on Improving the Readability of a Consent Form. Available at: http://www.maine.gov/dhhs/boh/IRB/IRB%20intranet/readguid.pdf (Accessed 8/12/2009).
Hartley, 2004, Designing instructional and informational text, 917
Guidelines for Writing Informed Consent Documents. National Institutes of Health, Office of Human Subjects Research, 2006. Available at: http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/info/sheet6.html (Accessed 8/12/2009).
2005
The Plain Language Action and Information Network (PLAIN). What is plain language? Available at: http://www.plainlanguage.gov/whatisPL/index.cfm (Accessed 3/8/2010).
Hammerschmidt, 1992, Institutional Review Board (IRB) review lacks impact on readability of consent forms for research, Am J Med Sci, 304, 348, 10.1097/00000441-199212000-00003
Clear and Simple: Developing Effective Print Materials for Low-Literate Readers. NCI, NIH Publication No. 95-3594, 1994. Available at: http://www.cancer.gov/aboutnci/oc/clear-and-simple/page1 (Accessed 8/16/2009).
Raich, 2001, Literacy, comprehension, and informed consent in clinical research, Cancer Invest, 19, 437, 10.1081/CNV-100103137
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Available at: http://www.health.gov/communication/literacy/quickguide/factsbasic.htm#one (Accessed 8/12/09).
Kirsch, 1993
Kutner, 2006
Sharp, 2004, Consent documents for oncology trials: does anybody read these things?, Am J Clin Oncol, 27, 570, 10.1097/01.coc.0000135925.83221.b3
Flory, 2004, Interventions to improve research participants’ understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review, JAMA, 292, 1593, 10.1001/jama.292.13.1593
Grossman, 1994, Are informed consent forms that describe clinical oncology research protocols readable by most patients and their families?, J Clin Oncol, 12, 2211, 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.10.2211
Silverman, 2001, Variability among institutional review boards’ decisions within the context of a multicenter trial, Crit Care Med, 29, 235, 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00002
Appelbaum, 1987
Wright, 2004, Why cancer patients enter randomized clinical trials: exploring the factors that influence their decision, J Clin Oncol, 22, 4312, 10.1200/JCO.2004.01.187