Early secondary prevention of occupational skin disease in Germany: the dermatologist’s procedure in perspective

Internationales Archiv für Arbeitsmedizin - Tập 77 - Trang 142-149 - 2003
H. Dickel1, O. Kuss2, S. M. John1, O. Blome3, K. H. Hagemann4, H. J. Schwanitz1
1Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
2Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
3Central Federation of the Industrial Professional Associations, Sankt Augustin, Germany
4National Association of the Industrial Professional Associations for Northwest Germany, Hanover, Germany

Tóm tắt

The dermatologist’s procedure was introduced in 1972 as a “procedure of early detection of occupational skin disease” by industrial, agricultural and public-sector employers’ liability insurance funds of Germany’s statutory occupational accident insurance. To date, it represents the most relevant tool for secondary prevention in industrial dermatology in Germany. According to the intention of this procedure, insured parties who are likely to have an occupational skin disease have to be offered preventive measures and, if necessary, given appropriate treatment to avoid job-loss. In co-operation with the Central Federation of the Industrial Professional Associations, the Task Force on Occupational and Environmental Dermatology of the German Dermatological Society, and the Professional Organisation of German Dermatologists, a study group was constituted in 1999 to improve the traditional dermatologist’s procedure. In October 2002 a controlled intervention study was started in North-western Germany to establish the definitive value of the “optimised” dermatologist’s procedure. Past, present, and future of this specific procedure are discussed.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Asanger R (1973) [Current status of rehabilitation of occupational skin diseases]. Berufsdermatosen 21:109–113 Blome O (1998) [Diseases related to work—§ 3 BKV]. Ergo Med 22:276–282 Blome O (2000) [Dermatologist’s conflict in reporting occupational skin disease with regard to pledge of secrecy and data security]. Dermatol Beruf Umwelt 48:134–137 Borelli S (1973) [Medical and vocational rehabilitation]. Berufsdermatosen 21:113–116 Borelli S (1980) Das Hautarztverfahren. DIA 8:86; 88; 91–93 Borelli S (1985) Hautarztbericht—Hautarztverfahren. Dt Derm 33:1339; 1341–1342; 1345 Borelli S, Düngemann H (1975) [2 years of dermatologic procedures and dermatologic evaluation from the dermatological viewpoint]. Hefte Unfallheilkd 121:460–473 Borelli S, Düngemann H (1976) [Dermatologic procedures and the dermatologist’s report]. Zentralbl Arbeitsmed Arbeitsschutz Prophyl 26:257–263 Brandenburg S (2001) [Administration procedure with occupational diseases]. Trauma Berufskrankh 3:91–93 Braun W (1973) [Cooperation between dermatologic hospitals, trade unions and occupational promotion agencies in the medical and social rehabilitation of occupational skin diseases]. Berufsdermatosen 21:116–119 Cherry N, Meyer JD, Adisesh A, Brooke R, Owen-Smith V, Swales C, Beck MH (2000) Surveillance of occupational skin disease: EPIDERM and OPRA. Br J Dermatol 142:1128–1134 Coenraads PJ, Diepgen TL (1998) Risk for hand eczema in employees with past or present atopic dermatitis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 71:7–13 Cooley JE, Nethercott JR (1994) Prognosis of occupational skin disease. Occup Med 9:19–24 Dickel H, Kuss O, Blesius CR, Schmidt A, Diepgen TL (2001) Occupational skin diseases in Northern Bavaria between 1990 and 1999: a population-based study. Br J Dermatol 145:453–462 Dickel H, Blome O, Axt-Hammermeister A, Gobrecht E, Hagemann KH, Kuss O, Schwanitz HJ, John SM (2002) [Optimised dermatologist’s report “OHAV”: start of a pilot study in Northwest Germany]. Dermatol Beruf Umwelt 50:241–242 Dickel H, Bruckner T, Bernhard-Klimt C, Koch T, Scheidt R, Diepgen TL (2002) Surveillance scheme for occupational skin disease in the Saarland, FRG: first report from BKH-S. Contact Dermatitis 46:197–206 Dickel H, Bruckner TM, Diepgen TL (2002) Population-based data of occupational skin disease from surveillance schemes: a bold venture? Contact Dermatitis 46:19 Dickel H, Bruckner TM, Schmidt A, Diepgen TL (2003) Impact of atopic skin diathesis on occupational skin disease incidence in a working population. J Invest Dermatol 121:37–40 Diepgen TL (2002) Berufsbedingte Kontaktekzeme—Ansätze der Prävention und Frühtherapie. Derm 8:225–228 Diepgen TL (2003) Occupational skin-disease data in Europe. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 76:331–338 Diepgen TL, Coenraads PJ (1999) The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 72:496–506 Diepgen TL, Schmidt A, Schmidt M, Fartasch M (1994) [Demographic and legal characteristics of occupational skin diseases]. Allergologie 17:84–89 dos Santos Silva I (1999) Cancer epidemiology: principles and methods. International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization (IARC/WHO), Lyon, p 425 Drexel G (2001) [Medical practitioners’ duty of notification]. Trauma Berufskrankh 3:120–126 Eck E (1989) [Occupational skin diseases]. Akt Dermatol 15:352–356 Ehlers G, Klaschka F, Borelli S, Düngemann H, Asanger R, Hamacher E, Last H, Stollenz E, Raschke G (1981) [81st Session of the Dermatological Society of Berlin, 12 May 1979. Round table discussion: occupational dermatoses]. Z Hautkr 56:639–640; 643–646; 648–653; 656–658; 661–662; 664–666; 668–671 Franke W (1977) [Statistical evaluation of 12,457 BK (Berufskrankheit—occupational disease) procedures—industrial medicine experiences with the dermatologist’s procedure]. Z Hautkr 52:40–50 Frosch PJ, Rycroft RJG (2001) International legal aspects of contact dermatitis. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin JP (eds) Textbook of contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 997–1014 Hamacher E (1981) Schwerpunkte des “Hautarztverfahrens”. Derm Beruf Umwelt 29:21–23 Hamacher E (1988) Hautarztverfahren ‘88. Dtsch Arztebl 85:C-2124; 2126–2127 Hauptverband der gewerblichen Berufsgenossenschaften (HVBG) (2002) Geschäfts- und Rechnungsergebnisse der gewerblichen Berufsgenossenschaften 2001. Bonifatius, Druck-Buch, Paderborn, p 144 Hogan DJ (1994) The prognosis of occupational contact dermatitis. Occup Med 9:53–58 Hutchings CV, Shum KW, Gawkrodger DJ (2001) Occupational contact dermatitis has an appreciable impact on quality of life. Contact Dermatitis 45:17–20 John SM (1999) [Dermatologist’s procedure 1999]. Derm Beruf Umwelt 47:118–131 Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV) (2001) Vertrag gem. § 34 Abs. 3 SGB VII zwischen dem Hauptverband der gewerblichen Berufsgenossenschaften, dem Bundesverband der landwirtschaftlichen Berufsgenossenschaften, dem Bundesverband der Unfallkassen einerseits und der Kassenärztlichen Bundesvereinigung andererseits über die Durchführung der Heilbehandlung, die Vergütung der Ärzte sowie die Art und Weise der Abrechnung der ärztlichen Leistungen (Vertrag Ärzte/Unfallversicherungsträger, gültig ab 1. Mai 2001). Dtsch Arztebl 98:Sonderbeilage 1–158 Kühl M (1982) [Contribution to the discussion dealing with dermatologist report and/or medical announcement on given reason for suspected occupational disease]. Derm Beruf Umwelt 30:20–25 Noeske H (1972) Verfahren zur Früherfassung berufsbedingter Hauterkrankungen (Hautarztverfahren). Die BG 263–267 Panter W (2002) Empfehlung der Spitzenverbände der Unfallversicherungsträger, des Verbandes Deutscher Betriebs- und Werksärzte und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Arbeitsmedizin und Umweltmedizin: Über die Zusammenarbeit mit den Betriebsärzten in Verfahren zur Feststellung einer Berufskrankheit einschliesslich von Massnahmen nach § 3 BKV. Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed 37:400–401 Rakoski J, Borelli S (1989) [The significance of dermatologic management in computer-assisted occupational dermatology consultation]. Z Hautkr 64:31–33 Schwanitz HJ (2000) Verbesserung des Hautarztverfahrens. Dermatol Beruf Umwelt 48:224–231 Schwanitz HJ, Riehl U, Schlesinger T, Bock M, Skudlik C, Wulfhorst B (2003) Skincare management: educational aspects. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 76:374–381 Taylor JS (1988) Occupational disease statistics. In perspective. Arch Dermatol 124:1557–1558