Early bond strength of two resin cements to Y-TZP ceramic using MPS or MPS/4-META silanes
Tóm tắt
For cementation of yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconium polycrystal (Y-TZP) ceramic frameworks, protocols of surface-conditioning methods and available cements vary, resulting in confusion among clinicians regarding selection and effects of different conditioning methods on cement adhesion. This study evaluated the effect of two silanes (3-trimethoxysilylpropylmethacrylate (MPS) and 3-trimethoxysilylpropylmethacrylate/4-methacryloyloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride methyl methacrylate (MPS/4-META) on the adhesion of two resin-based cements (SuperBond and Panavia F 2.0) to Y-TZP ceramic and compared several protocols with those indicated by the manufacturer of each of these cements. Disks of Y-TZP ceramic (LAVA, 3M ESPE) (n = 60) were divided into six experimental groups (n = 10 per group) and treated as follows: (1) silica coating (SC) + MPS silane + SuperBond; (2) SC + MPS/4-META + silane + SuperBond); (3) SC + MPS silane + Panavia F 2.0); (4) SC + MPS/4-META silane + Panavia F 2.0); (5) no conditioning + MPS/4-META silane + Super-Bond (SuperBond instructions); and (6) 50-μm Al2O3 conditioning + Panavia F 2.0 (Panavia F 2.0 instructions). The specimens were subjected to shear-bond testing after water storage at 37°C for 3 months in the dark. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance and Tukey’s HSD (α = 0.05). After silica coating, the mean bond strength of SuperBond cement was not significantly different between MPS and MPS/4-META silanes (20.2 ± 3.7 and 20.9 ± 1.6 MPa, respectively), but the mean bond strength of Panavia F 2.0 was significantly higher with MPS silane (24.4 ± 5.3 MPa) than with MPS/4-META (12.3 ± 1.4 MPa) (P < 0.001). The SuperBond manufacturer’s instructions alone resulted in significantly higher bond strength (9.7 ± 3.1 MPa) than the Panavia F 2.0 manufacturer’s instruction (0 MPa) (P < 0.001). When silica coating and silanization were used, both SuperBond and Panavia F 2.0 cements demonstrated higher bond strengths they did when the manufacturers’ instructions were followed. With SuperBond, use of MPS or MPS/4-META silane resulted in no significant difference when the ceramic surface was silica coated, but with Panavia F 2.0, use of MPS silane resulted in a significantly higher bond strength than use of MPS/4-META. Use of chairside silica coating and silanization to condition the zirconia surface improved adhesion compared with the manufacturers’ cementation protocols for SuperBond and Panavia F 2.0 resin cements.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999;20:1–25.
Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2004;20:449–456.
Luthardt RG, Sandkuhl O, Reitz B. Zirconia-TZP and aluminaadvanced technologies for the manufacturing of single crowns. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1999;7:113–119.
Ardlin BI. Transformation-toughened zirconia for dental inlays, crowns and bridges: chemical stability and effect of low-temperature aging on flexural strength and surface structure. Dent Mater 2002;18:590–595.
Drummond JL. Ceramic behavior under different environmental and loading conditions. In: Eliades G, Eliades T, Brantley WA, Watts DC. Dental materials in vivo: Aging and related phenomena. Carol Stream: Quintessence; 2003. p. 35–45.
Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature: J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:268–274.
Özcan M, Alkumru HN, Gemalmaz D. The effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of luting cement to a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:335–339.
Özcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003;19:725–731.
Amaral R, Bottino MA, Valandro LF, Özcan M. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning. Dent Mater 2006;22: 283–290.
Valandro LF, Özcan M, Bottino MC, Scotti R, Bottino MA, Della Bona A. Bond strength of a resin cement to high-alumina and zirconia-reinforced ceramics: the effect of surface conditioning. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:175–181.
Valandro LF, Özcan M, Amaral R, Leite FP, Bottino MA. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to silica-coated and silanized In-Ceram Zirconia before and after aging. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:70–72.
Zhang Y, Pajares A, Lawn BR. Fatigue and damage tolerance of Y-TZP ceramics in layered biomechanical systems. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;71:166–171.
Plueddemann EP. Adhesion through silane coupling agents. J Adhes 1970;2:184–201.
Ooij van WJ, Sabata A. Characterization of films of organofunctional silanes by TOF SIMS and XPS. Part I. Films of N-(2-(vinylbenzylamino) ethyl)-3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane on zinc and 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane on steel substrates. In: Mittal KL, editor. Silanes and other coupling agents. Utrecht: VSP, 1992; p. 323–343.
Mohsen NM, Craig RG. Hydrolytic stability of silanated zirconia silica-urethane dimethacrylate composites. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22: 213–220.
Edelhoff D, Özcan M. To what extend does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of cement? Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:193–204.
Raigrodski AJ, Chiche GJ, Potiket N, Hochstedler JL, Mohamed SE, Biliot S, Mercante DE. The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: a prospective clinical pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:237–244.
Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Luthy H, Gauckler LJ, Scharer P, Hammerle CF. Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. Quintessence Int 2006;37: 685–693.
Wassermann A, Kaiser M, Strub JR. Clinical long-term results of VITA In-Ceram Classic crowns and fixed partial dentures: a systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:355–363.
Dérand P, Dérand T. Bond strength of luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:131–135.
Tinschert J, Zwez D, Marx R, Anusavice KJ. Structural reliability of alumina-, feldspar-, leucite-, mica- and zirconia-based ceramics. J Dent 2000;28:529–535.
Miller JD, Hoh KP, Ishida H. Studies of the simulation of silane coupling agent structures on particulate fillers; the pH effect. Polym Composites 1984;5:18–28.
Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater 1998;14:64–71.
Wegner SM, Kern M. Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:139–147.
Yoshida K, Tsuo Y, Atsuta M. Bonding of dual-cured resin cement to zirconia ceramic using phosphate acid ester monomer and zirconate coupler. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006;77:28–33.
Wada T. Development of a new adhesive material and its properties. In: Gettleman L, Vrijhoef MMA, Uchiyama Y, editors. Proc Int Symp Adhes Prosthodont, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Chicago: Academy of Dental Materials; 1986. p. 9–18.
Della Bona A, van Noort R. Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res 1995;74:1591–1596.