Early Glimmers of the Now Familiar Ethnomethodological Themes in Garfinkel’s “The Perception of the Other”
Human Studies - 2012
Tóm tắt
Garfinkel’s dissertation, “The Perception of the Other,” was completed and defended 15 years prior to the publication of Studies in Ethnomethodology. This essay seeks hints of the familiar ethnomethodological themes (indexicality, reflexivity, accountability) within his thesis. It begins by examining the contributions of earlier social theorists, particularly Talcott Parsons and Alfred Schütz, to Garfinkel’s thought. It then examines the dissertation itself seeking evidence to support the claim that Garfinkel was already moving in the direction of an ‘incommensurable, asymmetric, and alternate’ program of sociological inquiry well before the term ‘ethnomethodology’ had even been coined.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bruner, J., & Postman, L. (1949). On the perception of incongruity: A paradigm. Journal of Personality, 18, 206–223.
Garfinkel, H. (1952). The perception of the other: A study in social order. Unpublished dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Garfinkel, H. (1960). A comparison of decisions made on four “pre-theoretical” problems by Talcott Parsons and Alfred Schuetz. Unpublished mimeo.
Garfinkel, H. (1962). Common-sense knowledge of social structures: The documentary method of interpretation. In J. M. Scher (Ed.), Theories of the mind (pp. 689–712). New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
Garfinkel, H. (1963). A conception of, and experiments with, ‘trust’ as a condition of stable concerted actions. In O. J. Harvey (Ed.), Motivation and social interaction (pp. 187–238). New York: Ronald Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Garfinkel, H. (1988). Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena or order*, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. in and as of the essential quiddity of immortal ordinary society (I of IV): An announcement of studies. Sociological Theory, 6, 103–109.
Garfinkel, H. (2002). In A. Rawls (Ed.), Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Garfinkel, H. (2006). In A. Rawls (Ed.), Seeing sociologically: The routine grounds of social action. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Garfinkel, H. (2008). In A. Rawls (Ed.), Toward a sociological theory of information. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Garfinkel, H., & Wieder, D. L. (1992). Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In G. Watson & R. M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology (pp. 175–206). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Grathoff, R. (Ed.). (1978). The theory of social action: The correspondence of Alfred Schütz and Talcott Parsons. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Gurwitsch, A. (2010). Outlines of a theory of ‘Essentially Occasional Expressions’. In R. M. Zaner & L. Embree (Eds.), The collected works of Aron Gurwitsch (1901–1973) (Vol. III, pp. 519–537). Dordrecht: Springer.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Heritage, J. (1987). Ethnomethodology. In A. Giddens & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Social theory today (pp. 224–272). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Heritage, J. (1990). Interactional accountability: A conversation analytic perspective. In B. Conein, M. de Formel, & L. Quéré (Eds.), Les formes de la conversation (pp. 23–50). Paris: C.E.N.T.
Hinkle, G. J., et al. (1977). Transcript of a panel: When is phenomenology sociological? Annals of Phenomenological Sociology, 2, 1–40.
Hobbes, T. (1962/1651). Leviathan, or the matter, forme and power of a commonwealth ecclesiastical and civil. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers.
Langsdorf, L. (1995). Treating method and form as phenomena: An appreciation of Garfinkel’s phenomenology of social action. Human Studies, 18, 177–188.
Liberman, K. (2007). Husserl’s criticism of reason with ethnomethodological specifications. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Parsons, T. (1949/1937). The structure of social action: A study in social theory with special reference to a group of recent European writers. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Parsons, T. (1953). The theory of symbolism in relation to action. In T. Parsons, R. F. Bales, & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Working papers in the theory of action (pp. 31–62). New York: Free Press.
Parsons, T. (1978). A 1974 retrospective perspective. In R. Grathoff (Ed.), The theory of social action (pp. 115–124). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Parsons, T., et al. (1951). Some fundamental categories of the theory of action: A general statement. In T. Parsons & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action (pp. 3–30). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sandmeyer, B. (2009). Husserl’s constitutive phenomenology: It’s problem and promise. New York: Routledge.
Schütz, A. (1932). Der sinnhafte Aufbau der Sozialen Welt: Eine Einleitung in die verstende Soziologie. Wien: Verlag von Julius Springer.
Schütz, A. (1943). The problem of rationality in the social world. Economica, 10, 130–149.
Schütz, A. (1945). On multiple realities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5, 533–575.
Schütz, A. (1951). Choosing among projects of action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 12, 161–184.
Schütz, A. (1953). Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human actions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 14, 1–38.
Schütz, A. (1960). The social world and the theory of social action. Social Research, 27, 203–221.
Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46–62.
Sharrock, W., & Anderson, B. (1986). The ethnomethodologists. Chichester, U.K.: Ellis Horwood.