EPA adopts LNT: New historical perspectives

United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 1977 National Academy of Sciences (NAS), 1960 Anonymous, 1956, Genetic panel, W. Weaver, chair). National Academy of sciences (NAS), biological effects of atomic radiation (BEAR), genetic effects of atomic radiation, Science, 123, 1157 1956 National Academy of Sciences (NAS)/National Research Council (NRC), 1972, The effects on populations of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation Calabrese, 2015, On the origins of the linear no-threshold (LNT) dogma by means of untruths, artful dodges and blind faith, Environ. Res., 142, 432, 10.1016/j.envres.2015.07.011 Calabrese, 2013, Origin of the linearity no threshold (LNT) dose-response concept, Arch. Toxicol., 87, 1621, 10.1007/s00204-013-1104-7 Calabrese, 2009, The road to linearity: why linearity at low doses became the basis for carcinogen risk assessment, Arch. Toxicol., 83, 203, 10.1007/s00204-009-0412-4 Whittemore, 1986 Calabrese, 2019, The linear no-threshold (LNT) dose response model: a comprehensive assessment of its historical and scientific foundations, Chem. Biol. Interact., 301, 6, 10.1016/j.cbi.2018.11.020 National Committee on Radiation Protection and Measurement (NCRPM), 1960, Somatic radiation dose for the general population, Science, 131, 482, 10.1126/science.131.3399.482 Russell, 1958, Radiation dose rate and mutation frequency, Science, 128, 1546, 10.1126/science.128.3338.1546 Anonymous, 1956, Pathologic effects of atomic radiation. Committee on pathologic effects of atomic radiation, Science, 124, 60, 10.1126/science.124.3211.60 Altenburg, 1958 Calabrese, 2017, The threshold vs LNT showdown: dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 1. The Russell-Muller debate, Environ. Res., 154, 435, 10.1016/j.envres.2016.12.006 Calabrese, 2017, The threshold vs LNT showdown: dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 2, 154, 452 Calabrese, 2011, Toxicology rewrites its history and rethinks its future: giving equal focus to both harmful and beneficial effects, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 30, 2658, 10.1002/etc.687