EMU defended: reply to Newman (2014)

European Journal for Philosophy of Science - Tập 5 Số 3 - Trang 377-385 - 2015
Kareem Khalifa1
1Department of Philosophy, Middlebury College, Middlebury, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

De Regt, H. W. (2009). Understanding and scientific explanation. In H. W. de Regt, S. Leonelli, & K. Eigner (Eds.), Scientific understanding (pp. 21–42). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Harman, G. (1965). The inference to the best explanation. Philosophical Review, 74, 88–95.

Harman, G. (1986). Change in view: principles of reasoning. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Khalifa, K. (2012). Inaugurating understanding or repackaging explanation? Philosophy of Science, 79(1), 15–37.

Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the best explanation (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. Original edition, 1991.

Lycan, W. G. (1988). Judgment and justification, Cambridge studies in philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lycan, W. G. (2002). Explanation and epistemology. In P. K. Moser (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of epistemology (pp. 408–433). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Newman, M. (2014). EMU and inference: what the explanatory model of scientific understanding ignores. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 4(1), 55–74.

Pritchard, D. (2012). Anti-luck virtue epistemology. Journal of Philosophy, 109(3), 247–279.

Thagard, P. (1978). The best explanation: criteria for theory choice. Journal of Philosophy, 75, 76–92.

Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen: a theory of causal explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.