Dynamics of pollen tube growth under different competition regimes
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Arbeloa A, Herrero M (1991) Development of the ovular structures in peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch). New Phytol 118:527–533
Charlesworth D (1988) Evidence for pollen competition in plants and its relationship to progeny fitness: a comment. Am Nat 132:298–302
Charlesworth D, Schemske DW, Sork VL (1987) The evolution of plant reproductive characters: sexual versus natural selection. In: Stearns SC (ed) The evolution of sex and its consequences. Birkhauser, Basel, pp 317–335
Chasan R, Walbot V (1993) Mechanisms of plant reproduction: questions and approaches. Plant Cell 5:1139–1146
Cheung AY (1995) Pollen-pistil interactions in compatible pollination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:3077–3080
Cruzan MB (1986) Pollen tube distribution inNicotiana glauca: evidence for density dependent growth. Am J Bot 73:902–907
Cruzan MB (1993) Analysis of pollen-style interactions inPetunia hybrida; the determination of variance in male reproductive success. Sex Plant Reprod 6:275–281
Dayton DF (1974) Overcoming self-incompatibility in apple with killed compatible pollen. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 99:190–192
Free JB (1964) Comparison of the importance of insect and wind pollination of apple trees. Nature 201:726–727
Haldane JBS (1932) The causes of evolution. Longmans, Green, London
Hawthorn LR, Bohart GE, Toole EH (1956) Carrot seed yield and germination as affected by different levels of insect pollination. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 67:384–389
Herrero M (1992b) Mechanisms in the pistil that regulate gametophyte population in peach (Prunus persica). In: Ottaviano E, Mulcahy DL, Sari-Gorla M, Mulcahy GB (eds) Angiosperm pollen and ovules. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, pp 377–381
Herrero M, Arbeloa A (1989) Influence of the pistil on pollen tube kinetics in peach (Prunus persica). Am J Bot 76:1441–1447
Herrero M, Dickinson HG (1979) Pollen-pistil incompatibility inPetunia hybrida: changes in the pistil following compatible and incompatible intraspecific crosses. J Cell Sci 36:1–18
Herrero M, Dickinson HG (1980) Pollen tube growth following compatible and incompatible intraspecific pollinations inPetunia hybrida. Planta 148:217–221
Herrero M, Dickinson HG (1981) Pollen tube development in Petunia hybrida following compatible and incompatible intraspecific matings. J Cell Sci 47:365–383
Herscovitch JC, Martin ARH (1990) Pollen-pistil interactions inGrevillea banksii. II. Pollen tube ultrastructure and interactions, and results of field experiment. Grana 29:5–18
Hormaza JI, Herrero M (1994) Gametophytic competition and selection. In: Williams EG, Clarke AE, Knox RB (eds) Genetic control of self-incompatibility and reproductive development in flowering plants. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 372–400
Hossaert M, Valero M (1988) Effect of ovule position in the pod on patterns of seed formation in two species ofLathyrus (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae). Am J Bot 75:1714–1731
Janse J, Verhaegh JJ (1993) Effects of varying pollen load on fruit set, seed set and seedling performance in apple and pear. Sex Plant Reprod 6:122–126
Jefferies CJ, Belcher AR (1974) A fluorescent brightener used for pollen tube identification “in vivo”. Stain Technol49:199–202
Kahn TN, DeMason DA (1986) A quantitative and structural comparison ofCitrus pollen tube development in cross-compatible and self-incompatible gynoecia. Can J Bot 64:2548–2555
Kenrick J, Knox RB (1985) Self-incompatibility in the nitrogen-fixing tree,Acacia retinodes: quantitative cytology of pollen tube growth. Theor Appl Genet 69:481–488
Lee TD, Bazzaz FA (1982) Regulation of fruit maturation pattern in an annual legume,Cassia fasciculata. Ecology 63: 1374–1388
Levin DA (1990) Sizes of natural microgametophyte populations in pistils ofPhlox drummondii. Am J Bot 77:356–363
Lewis D (1994) Gametophytic-sporophytic incompatibility. In: Williams EG, Knox BR, Clarke AE (eds) Genetic control of self-incompatibility and reproductive development in flowering plants. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 88–101
Linskens HF, Esser K (1957) Über eine spezifische Anfarbung der Pollenschlauche und die Zahl Kallosapfropfen nach Selbstung und Fremdung. Naturwissenschaften 44:16
Marshall D, Folsom M (1991) Mate choice in plants: an anatomical to population perspective. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 22:37–63
Marshall DL, Whittaker KL (1989) Effects of pollen donor identity on offspring quality in wild radish,Raphanus sativus. Am J Bot 76:1081–1088
Mulcahy DL (1971) A correlation between gametophytic and sporophytic characteristics inZea mays L. Science 171: 1155–156
Mulcahy GB, Mulcahy DL (1983) A comparison of pollen tube growth in bi- and trinucleate pollen. In: Mulcahy DL, Ottaviano E (eds) Pollen: biology and implications for plant breeding. Elsevier, New York, pp 29–33
Mulcahy DL, Mulcahy GB (1987) The effects of pollen competition. Am Sci 75:44–50
Mulcahy DL, Mulcahy GB, Ottaviano E (1978) Further evidence that gametophytic selection modifies the genetic quality of the sporophyte. Soc Bot Fr Actual Bot 1-2:57–60
Niesenbaum RA, Casper B (1994) Pollen tube numbers and selective fruit maturation inLindera benzoin. Am Nat 144:184–191
Ockendon DJ, Gates PJ (1975) Growth of cross- and self-pollen tubes in the styles ofBrassica oleracea. New Phytol75: 155–160
Palmer TM, Zimmerman M (1994) Pollen competition and sporophyte fitness inBrassica campestris: does intense pollen competition result in individuals with better pollen? Oikos 69: 80–86
Pimienta E, Polito VS (1982) Ovule abortion in ‘Nonpareil’ almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill) DA Webb). Am J Bot 69: 913–920
Pimienta E, Polito VS, Kester DE (1983) Pollen tube growth in cross- and self-pollinated ‘Nonpareil’ almond. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 108:643–647
Plitmann U (1993) Pollen tube attrition as related to breeding systems in Brassicaceae. Plant Syst Evol 188:65–72
Rigney LP (1995) Postfertilization cause of differential success of pollen donors inErythronium grandiflorum(Liliaceae): nonrandom ovule abortion. Am J Bot 82:578–584
Rudramuniyappa CK, Panchaksharappa MG (1974) Histochemistry of pollen tube growth in vivo inTriticum durum Desf. Cytologia 39:665–671
Sayers ER, Murphy RP (1966) Seed set in alfalfa as related to pollen tube growth, fertilization frequency, and post-fertilization ovule abortion. Crop Sci 6:365–368
Schlichting CD, Stephenson AG, Small LE (1990) Pollen loads and progeny vigor inCucurbita pepo: the next generation. Evolution 44:1358–1372
Scribailo RW, Barrett SCH (1991) Pollen-pistil interactions in tristylousPontederia sagittata (Pontederiaceae). II. Patterns of pollen tube growth. Am J Bot 78:1643–1661
Sedgley M (1976) Control by the embryosac over pollen tube growth in the style of the avocado (Persea americana Mill). New Phytol 77: 149–152
Snow AA (1986) Pollination dynamics inEpilobium canum (Onagraceae): consequences for gametophytic selection. Am J Bot 73:139–151
Snow AA, Spira TP (1991) Pollen vigour and the potential for sexual selection in plants. Nature 352:796–797
Stephenson AG (1981) Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 12:253–279
Stephenson AG, Winsor JA (1986)Lotus corniculatus regulates offspring quality through selective fruit abortion. Evolution 40:453–458
Visser T, Verhaegh JJ (1988) The influence of double pollination and pollen load on seed set and seedling vigour of apple and pear. In: Cresti M, Gori P, Pacini E (eds) Sexual reproduction in higher plants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 369–374
Walsh N, Charlesworth D (1992) Evolutionary interpretations of differences in pollen tube growth rates. Q Rev Biol 67:19–37
Willson MF, Burley N (1983) Mate choice in plants: tactics, mechanisms, and consequences. Monographs in population biology 19. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ