Dynamical versus statistical production of Intermediate Mass Fragments at Fermi Energies
Tóm tắt
The emission probability of Intermediate Mass Fragments (IMFs) in non-central reactions has been investigated in collisions of heavy $$^{124}\hbox {Xe}$$ projectiles with the two different medium-mass targets of $$^{64}\hbox {Ni}$$ and $$^{64}\hbox {Zn}$$ at the laboratory energy of 35 A MeV. The two colliding systems differ only for the target atomic number Z and, consequently, for the isospin N/Z ratio. The probability of IMFs emission from the projectile-like fragment has been measured, showing an enhancement of the IMFs emission for the neutron rich $$^{64}\hbox {Ni}$$ target. Most of the observed projectile break-up yield is associated with the production of only one IMF, that is, a quasi-binary splitting of projectile in two fragments in a broad range of charge asymmetry. For the events with one IMF, the relative contributions of the dynamical and statistical emissions have been evaluated. We find an enhancement of dynamical break-up probability for the neutron rich target with respect to the neutron poor one. The analysis suggests influence of the target isospin in inducing the dynamical break-up of projectile-like fragments. The new data have been also compared with previous published results of $$^{112,124}\hbox {Sn}$$ + $$^{58,64}\hbox {Ni}$$ systems, in order to disentangle between isospin effects against system-size effects on the emission probability. The comparisons between previous and new data suggest that the dynamical break-up is determined by the N/Z content of both projectile and target; for the cases here investigated, the influence of the system size on the dynamical emission probability can be excluded.
Tài liệu tham khảo
P. Glässel, Dv Harrach, H. Specht, Z. Phys. A 310, 189 (1983)
G. Casini et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2567 (1993)
A.A. Stefanini et al., Z. Phys. A 351, 167 (1995)
J. Töke et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2920 (1995)
J. Dempsey et al., Phys. Rev. C 54, 1710 (1996)
J. Łukasik et al., Phys. Rev. C 55, 1906 (1997)
R. Laforest et al., Phys. Rev. C 59, 2567 (1999)
D. Theriault et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, 014610 (2005)
E. De Filippo et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, 044602 (2005)
E. De Filippo et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, 064604 (2005)
M. Di Toro, A. Olmi, R. Roy, Eur. Phys. J. A 30, 65 (2006)
M. Papa et al., Phys. Rev. C 75, 054616 (2007)
S. Piantelli et al., Phys. Rev. C 76, 061601 (2007)
P. Russotto et al., Phys. Rev. C 81, 064605 (2010)
A. McIntosh et al., Phys. Rev. C 81, 034603 (2010)
E. De Filippo et al., Phys. Rev. C 86, 014610 (2012)
A. Rodriguez Manso, A. McIntosh, A. Jedele, K. Hagel, L. Heilborn, Z. Kohley, L. May, A. Zarrella, S. Yennello, Phys. Rev. C 95, 044604 (2017)
A. Jedele et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 062501 (2017)
A. Pagano et al., Nucl. Phys. A 734, 504 (2004)
E. De Filippo, A. Pagano, Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 32 (2014)
F. Bocage et al., Nucl. Phys. A 676, 391 (2000)
P. Russotto et al., Phys. Rev. C 91, 014610 (2015)
B.A. Li, W.U. Schröder (eds.), Isospin Physics in Heavy-Ion Collisions at Intermediate Energies (Nova Science, New York, 2011)
V. Baran, M. Colonna, V. Greco, M. Di Toro, Phys. Rep. 410, 335 (2004)
B.A. Li, L.W. Chen, C.M. Ko, Phys. Rep. 464, 113 (2008)
M. Oertel, M. Hempel, T. Klähn, S. Typel, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015007 (2017)
A. Pagano, Nucl. Phys. News 22, 28 (2012). And refs. therein
S. Aiello et al., Nuclear Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 369, 50 (1996)
M. Alderighi et al., IEEE Trans. Nuclear Sci. 52, 1624 (2005)
E.V. Pagano et al., EPJ Web Conf. 117, 10008 (2016). And refs. therein
L. Acosta et al., J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 730, 012001 (2016)
E.V. Pagano, et al., in preparation
C. Cavata et al., Phys. Rev. C 42, 1760 (1990)
D. Lacroix, A. Van Lauwe, D. Durand, Phys. Rev. C 69, 054604 (2004)
V. Baran, M. Colonna, M. Di Toro, Nucl. Phys. A 730, 329 (2004)
M. Colonna, M. Di Toro, G. Fabbri, S. Maccarone, Phys. Rev. C 57, 1410 (1998)
V.E. Viola, K. Kwiatkowski, M. Walker, Phys. Rev. C 31, 1550 (1985)