Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network

Badreddine, 2010, A dynamic barriers implementation in Bayesian-based bow tie diagrams for risk analysis, 1

Bearfield, 2005, Generalising event trees using Bayesian networks with a case study of train derailment, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3688, 52, 10.1007/11563228_5

Bobbio, 2001, Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping FTs into Bayesian networks, Journal of Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 71, 249, 10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00077-6

Boudali, 2005, A new Bayesian approach to solve dynamic FTs, 451

CSB, 2007. Mixing and heating a flammable liquid in an open top tank. Investigation No. 2006-08-I-IL. Washington, DC, April 2007 http://www.csb.gov/assets/document/CSBUniversalFormClampCaseStudy.pdf (last checked on 20.04.11).

Ching, 2009, Bayesian updating of reliability of civil infrastructure facilities based on condition-state data and fault-tree model, Journal of Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 94, 1962, 10.1016/j.ress.2009.07.002

Cockshott, 2005, Probability bow-ties a transparent risk management tool, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 83, 307, 10.1205/psep.04380

Crowl, 2002

Delvosalle, 2005, Identification of reference accident scenarios in SEVESO establishments, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 90, 238, 10.1016/j.ress.2004.11.003

Delvosalle, 2006, ARAMIS project: a comprehensive methodology for the identification of reference scenarios in process industries, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 130, 200, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.005

Dianous, 2006, ARAMIS project: a more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 130, 220, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.010

Ferson, S., 2005. Bayesian methods in risk assessment. Unpublished Report Prepared for the Bureau de Recherches Geologiques et Minieres (BRGM). New York.

Gowland, 2006, The accidental risk assessment methodology for industries (ARAMIS)/layer of protection analysis (LOPA) methodology: a step forward towards convergent practices in risk assessment?, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 130, 307, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.007

HUGIN Expert Software Version 7.4, 2010. http://www.hugin.com.

Jensen, 2007

Kalantarnia, 2009, Dynamic risk assessment using failure assessment and Bayesian theory, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22, 600, 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.04.006

Khakzad, 2011, Safety analysis in process facilities: comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches, Journal of Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 96, 925, 10.1016/j.ress.2011.03.012

Khan, 1998, Techniques and methodologies for risk analysis in chemical process industries, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 11, 261, 10.1016/S0950-4230(97)00051-X

Khan, 2001, Use maximum-credible accident scenario for realistic and reliable risk assessment, Chemical Engineering Progress, 11, 56

Markowski, 2009, Fuzzy logic for process safety analysis, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22, 695, 10.1016/j.jlp.2008.11.011

Marsh, 2007, Representing parameterised fault trees using Bayesian networks, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4680, 120, 10.1007/978-3-540-75101-4_13

Meel, 2006, Plant-specific dynamic failure assessment using Bayesian theory, Chemical Engineering Science, 61, 7036, 10.1016/j.ces.2006.07.007

Montani, 2008, RADYBAN: a tool for reliability analysis of dynamic FTs through conversion into dynamic Bayesian networks, Journal of Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 93, 922, 10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.013

Nivolianitou, 2004, Comparison of techniques for accident scenario analysis in hazardous systems, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 17, 467, 10.1016/j.jlp.2004.08.001

OREDA, 2002. Offshore Reliability Data Handbook. SINTEF Industrial Management. Det Norske Veritas.

Pearl, 1988

Rathnayaka, 2011, SHIPP methodology: predictive accident modeling approach. Part II. Validation with case study, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 89, 75, 10.1016/j.psep.2010.12.002

Sklet, 2004, Comparison of some selected methods for accident investigation, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 111, 29, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.02.005

Sklet, 2006, Hydrocarbon release on oil and gas production platforms: release scenarios and safety barriers, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 19, 481, 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.12.003

Weber, 2010, Overview on Bayesian networks application for dependability, risk analysis and maintenance areas, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence