Dynamic responses of structure–soil–structure systems with an extension of the equivalent linear soil modeling

Wang, 1992, Dynamic structure–soil–structure interaction by FEM and BEM, Comput Mech, 5, 347, 10.1007/BF00370014 A. Imamura, T. Watanabe, M. Ishizaki, M. Motosaka. Seismic response characteristics of embedded structures considering cross interaction. In: Proceedings of the tenth world conference on earthquake engineering. 1992. Balkema Rotterdam. p. 1719–1724. Huang, 1993 Mulliken, 1994 Mulliken, 1995, Discrete model for foundation–soil–foundation interaction, Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 7, 501 Qian, 1995, Dynamic interaction between 3‐D rigid surface foundations and comparison with the ATC‐3 provisions, Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 24, 419, 10.1002/eqe.4290240309 Qian, 1996, Harmonic wave response of two 3-D rigid surface foundations, Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 15, 95, 10.1016/0267-7261(95)00026-7 Mulliken, 1998, Discrete model for dynamic through-the-soil coupling of 3-D foundations and structures, Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 27, 687, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199807)27:7<687::AID-EQE752>3.0.CO;2-O Behnamfar, 1999, Dynamic response of adjacent structures under spatially variable seismic waves, Probab Eng Mech, 14, 33, 10.1016/S0266-8920(98)00033-2 S.A. Savids, C. Bode, R. Hirschauer. Three-dimensional structure-soil-structure interaction under seismic excitation with partial uplift 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. 2000. Lehmann, 2001, Dynamic structure–soil–structure interaction applying the symmetric Galerkin boundary method (SGBEM), Mech Res Com, 28, 297, 10.1016/S0093-6413(01)00177-X Kermani, 2002 Xu J, Costantino C, Hofmayer C, Ali S. Seismic response prediction of NUPEC׳s field model tests of NPP structures with adjacent building effect. In: Proceedings of the ASME/JSME 2004 pressure vessels and piping conference. 2004. p. 1–11. Kham, 2006, Seismic site–city interaction: main governing phenomena through simplified numerical models, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 96, 1934, 10.1785/0120050143 Padro´n, 2009, Dynamic structure–soil–structure interaction between nearby piled buildings under seismic excitation by BEM–FEM model, Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 29, 1084, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.01.001 Ghergu, 2010, Structure–soil–structure coupling in seismic excitation and “city effect”, Int J Eng Sci, 47, 342, 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2008.11.005 Clouteau, 2012, Calculation methods of Structure-Soil-Structure Interaction (3SI) for embedded buildings: Application to NUPEC tests, J Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 32, 129, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.08.005 Alexander, 2013, A simple discrete model for interaction of adjacent buildings during earthquakes, Comput Struct, 124, 1, 10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.11.012 Yue, 2013, Structure-soil-structure interaction effects for two heavy npp buildings with large-size embedded foundations, SMiRT22 Proceedings, Division V, 18 Aldaikh, 2015, Two dimensional numerical and experimental models for the study of structure–soil–structure interaction involving three buildings, Comput Struct, 150, 79, 10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.01.003 Trombetta, 2014, Nonlinear soil–foundation–structure and structure–soil–structure interaction: engineering demands, J Struct Eng, 04014177, 1 Ghandil, 2015, The near-field method for dynamic analysis of structures on soft soils including inelastic soil–structure interaction, Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 75, 1, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.03.018 ASCE/SEI 7-10, 2010 ANSI/AISC360, 2005 Ordonez GA. SHAKE2000, A computer program for the 1-D analysis of geotechnical earthquake engineering problems. 2006. PEER strong ground motion database. ver. 2010. 〈http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/search.html〉; 25/08/2010. University of California Berkeley, 2009 ASCE/SEI 41-13, 2013 Wolf, 1985 Ishihara, 1996 Kaklamanos, 2015, Comparison of 1D linear, equivalent-linear, and nonlinear site response models at six KiK-net validation sites, Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 69, 207, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.10.016 Vermeer, 1998 Das, 2008