Dynamic production characteristics and effect analysis of combined gas production well of coalbed methane and tight gas

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 12 - Trang 397-407 - 2021
Cheng Leli1,2, Zhao Shaoze3, Yin Senlin1, Chen Gongyang1, Chen Ling4, Xiong Ting5,6
1Institute of Logging Technology and Engineering, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China
2State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing, China
3College of Earth Sciences, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China
4Shenzhen Operating Company of Well-Tech Department, COSL, Shenzhen, China
5COSL Oilfield Production Research Institute, Tianjin, China
6School of Geosciences, Yangtze University, Wuhan, China

Tóm tắt

For gas reservoirs with poor physical properties, the implementation of a single well with multi-layer combined production is an effective means to achieve efficient development. However, because of the differences in the geological conditions of the vast majority of multi-layer gas reservoirs, the dynamic characteristics of the gas wells will be complex under the multi-layer combined mining mode, and the inevitable interlayer interference in the production process will affect the development effect. In this paper, the coal seam and the dense layer are opened for production at the same time. The two kinds of different types of production are not only restricted by the heterogeneity of each layer, but also the special development mode of the coal seam. Through analyzing and summarizing the productivity equation of two kinds of production layers and the characteristics of the change of production pressure, the coupling calculation is carried out by the iterative programming of node analysis method in the wellbore, which can dynamically predict the dynamic gas production. In comparison with the dynamic gas production dynamics of combined production and the overlay production of each production layer, it is found that the amount of accumulated gas production of multiple production layers in the forecast period is only 2.56% lower than that of the single production of the multi-production layer, but the investment cost of the single well multi-layer production is far lower than that of the single production, and the stable production time of the combined production is longer, indicating that the stable production time is longer.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aly A, Chen HY, Lee WJ (1994) A new technique for analysis of wellbore pressure from multi-layered reservoirs with unequal initial pressures to determine individual layer properties. SPE29176 Aminian K, Ameri S (2009) Predicting production performance of CBM reservoirs. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 1(1–2):25–30 Bo Yang, Hai Tang, Zhou Ke Fu, Chunmei Wang Yan (2010) A simple new method for rational production allocation of multi-layer commingled production wells [J]. Oil and gas well testing 01(66–68):78 Clarkson CR, Jordan CL, Ilk D, Blasingame TA (2009) Production data analysis of fractured and horizontal CBM wells. In: SPE eastern regional meeting. Society of Petroleum Engineers Clarkson CR, Salmachi A (2017) Rate-transient analysis of an undersaturated CBM reservoir in Australia: accounting for effective permeability changes above and below desorption pressure. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 40:51–60 Dong Y, Li MX, Liao RQ, Luo W, Education WH (2016) Modification of Beggs-Brill pressure gradient predicting model for multiphase flow in vertical wells. J. Oil and Gas Technol. 38(1):40–47 Jang J, Santamarina JC (2014) Evolution of gas saturation and relative permeability during gas production from hydrate-bearing sediments: gas invasion vs. gas nucleation. J. Geophys. Res: Solid Earth. 119(1):116–126 King GR (1993) Material-balance techniques for coal-seam and devonian shale gas reservoirs with limited water influx. SPE Reserv Eng 8(1):67–72 Larsen L (1981) Wells producing commingled zones with unequal initial pressures and reservoir properties. SPE10325 Lefkovits HC, Hazebrook P, Allen EE (1961) A study of the behavior of bounded reservoirs composed of stratified layers[J]. SPEJ. 3:43–58 Li Q, Li Y, Gao S, Liu H, Ye L, Wu H, An W (2021) Well network optimization and recovery evaluation of tight sandstone gas reservoirs. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 196:107705 Liu G, Meng Z, Luo D, Wang J, Gu D, Yang D (2020) Experimental evaluation of interlayer interference during commingled production in a tight sandstone gas reservoir with multi-pressure systems. Fuel 262:116557 Loucks RG, Ruppel SC (2007) Mississippian Barnett Shale: Lithofacies and depositional setting of a deep-water shale-gas succession in the Fort Worth Basin. Texas AAPG Bulletin 91(4):579–601 Mohaghegh, S., Ertekin, T. (1991). A type-curve solution for coal seam degasification wells producing under two-phase flow conditions. In SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Qiguo Liu, Hui Wang, Ruicheng Wang, Xiaochang Li (2010) Calculation method and influencing factors of stratified production contribution of multilayer gas reservoir [J]. J. Southwest Petrol. Univ. (Natural Science Edition) 01(80–84):196 Salvi BL, Panwar NL (2012) Biodiesel resources and production technologies–a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(6):3680–3689 Shanley KW, Cluff RM, Robinson JW (2004) Factors controlling prolific gas production from low-permeability sandstone reservoirs: Implications for resource assessment, prospect development, and risk analysis. AAPG Bull 88(8):1083–1121 Sheikholeslami M, Jafaryar M (2020) Nanoparticles for improving the efficiency of heat recovery unit involving entropy generation analysis. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 115:96–107 Sheikholeslami M, Jafaryar M, Said Z, Alsabery AI, Babazadeh H, Shafee A (2021) Modification for helical turbulator to augment heat transfer behavior of nanomaterial via numerical approach. Appl. Therm. Eng. 182:115935 Sheikholeslami, M., Farshad, S. A., Ebrahimpour, Z., Said, Z. (2021). Recent progress on flat plate solar collectors and photovoltaic systems in the presence of nanofluid: a review. J. Cl. Prod. 126119 Sun Z, Shi J, Zhang T, Wu K, Miao Y, Feng D, Li X (2018) The modified gas-water two phase version flowing material balance equation for low permeability CBM reservoirs. J Petrol Sci Eng 165:726–735 Sun Z, Shi J, Wu K, Zhang T, Feng D, Li X (2019) Effect of pressure-propagation behavior on production performance: implication for advancing low-permeability coalbed-methane recovery. SPE J 24(02):681–697 Sun Z, Li X, Liu W, Zhang T, He M, Nasrabadi H (2020) Molecular dynamics of methane flow behavior through realistic organic nanopores under geologic shale condition: Pore size and kerogen types. Chem. Eng. J. 398:124341 Welge HJ (1952) A simplified method for computing oil recovery by gas or water drive. J Petrol Technol 4(04):91–98 Wen Y, Wu Z, Wang J, Wu J, Yin Q, Luo W (2017) Experimental study of liquid holdup of liquid-gas two-phase flow in horizontal and inclined pipes. Int J Heat Technol 35(4):713–720 Yanli Xiong, Xi Feng, Yahe Yang, Shuqing Hu (2005) Performance characteristics and development effect analysis of multi-layer combined production gas wells [J]. Nat. gas explor. develop. 01(21–24):3 Zhao W, Zhang T, Jia C, Li X, Wu K, He M (2020) Numerical simulation on natural gas migration and accumulation in sweet spots of tight reservoir. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 81:103454 Zhao W, Jia C, Jiang L, Zhang T, He M, Zhang F, Wu K (2021) Fluid charging and hydrocarbon accumulation in the sweet spot, Ordos Basin, China. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 200:108391