Dynamic capabilities for orchestrating digital innovation ecosystems: Conceptual integration and research opportunities

Information and Organization - Tập 32 - Trang 100422 - 2022
Bastian Kindermann1, Torsten Oliver Salge2, Daniel Wentzel3, Tessa Christina Flatten1, David Antons2
1Chair for Technology & Management, TU Dortmund University, Vogelpothsweg 87, 44221 Dortmund, Germany
2Institute for Technology and Innovation Management, RWTH Aachen University, Kackertstraße 7, 52072 Aachen, Germany
3Chair of Marketing, RWTH Aachen University, Kackertstraße 7, 52072 Aachen, Germany

Tài liệu tham khảo

Acciai, 2021, The politics of research and innovation: Understanding instrument choices in complex governance environments – the case of France and Italy, Research Policy, 50, 104254, 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104254 Adner, 2006, Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem, Harvard Business Review, 84, 98 Adner, 2017, Ecosystem as structure, Journal of Management, 43, 39, 10.1177/0149206316678451 Adner, 2010, Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations, Strategic Management Journal, 31, 306, 10.1002/smj.821 Ambrosini, 2009, Dynamic capabilities: An exploration of how firms renew their resource base, British Journal of Management, 20, S9, 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00610.x Anderson, 2014, Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities, Information Systems Research, 25, 152, 10.1287/isre.2013.0505 Autio, 2020, Value co-creation in ecosystems: Insights and research promise from three disciplinary perspectives Baldwin, 2018, Bottlenecks, modules, and dynamic architectural capabilities Bechky, 2003, Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor, Organization Science, 14, 312, 10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162 Bergman, 2007, Boundary objects in design: an ecological view of design artifacts, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8, 546, 10.17705/1jais.00144 BMW Open Data Platform BMW PressClub Boland, 2007, Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction, Organization Science, 18, 631, 10.1287/orsc.1070.0304 Boland, 1995, Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing, Organization Science, 6, 350, 10.1287/orsc.6.4.350 Boudreau, 2012, Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation, Organization Science, 23, 1409, 10.1287/orsc.1110.0678 Brusoni, 2001, Unpacking the black box of modularity: Technologies, products and organizations, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 179, 10.1093/icc/10.1.179 Brusoni, 2001, Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make?, Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 597, 10.2307/3094825 Carlile, 2002, A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development, Organization Science, 13, 442, 10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953 Cennamo, 2018, Building the value of next-generation platforms: The paradox of diminishing returns, Journal of Management, 44, 3038, 10.1177/0149206316658350 Cennamo, 2018, Platform architecture and quality trade-offs of multihoming complements, Information Systems Research, 29, 461, 10.1287/isre.2018.0779 Cennamo, 2013, Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets, Strategic Management Journal (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 34, 1331 Chen, 2022, Governance and design of digital platforms: A review and future research directions on a meta-organization, Journal of Management, 48, 147, 10.1177/01492063211045023 Collis, 1994, Research Note: How Valuable Are Organizational Capabilities?, Strategic Management Journal, 15, 143, 10.1002/smj.4250150910 Constantinides, 2018, Platforms and infrastructures in the digital age, Information Systems Research, 29, 381, 10.1287/isre.2018.0794 Cusumano, 2019 Dattée, 2018, Maneuvering in poor visibility: How firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high, Academy of Management Journal, 61, 466, 10.5465/amj.2015.0869 Dhanaraj, 2006, Orchestrating innovation networks, Academy of Management Review, 31, 659, 10.5465/amr.2006.21318923 Eaton, 2015, Distributed tuning of boundary resources: the case of apple’s Ios service system, MIS Quarterly, 39, 217, 10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.10 Eisenhardt, 2000, Dynamic capabilities: What are they?, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105, 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E El Sawy, 2010, Seeking the configurations of digital ecodynamics: It takes three to tango, Information Systems Research, 21, 835, 10.1287/isre.1100.0326 Ethiraj, 2007, Allocation of inventive effort in complex product systems, Strategic Management Journal (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 28, 563 Fang, 2021, Platform diffusion at temporary gatherings: Social coordination and ecosystem emergence, Strategic Management Journal (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 42, 233 Fichman, 2014, Digital innovation as a fundamental and powerful concept in the information systems curriculum, MIS Quarterly, 38, 329, 10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.2.01 Fleming, 2004, Science as a map in technological search, Strategic Management Journal, 25, 909, 10.1002/smj.384 Foerderer, 2020, Interfirm exchange and innovation in platform ecosystems: Evidence from Apple’s worldwide developers conference, Management Science, 66, 4772, 10.1287/mnsc.2019.3425 Foerderer, 2018, Does platform owner’s entry crowd out innovation? Evidence from Google photos, Information Systems Research, 29, 444, 10.1287/isre.2018.0787 Franke, 2006, Finding commercially attractive user innovations: A test of lead-user theory, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 301, 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00203.x Galison, 1997 Ganco, 2020, From rugged landscapes to rugged ecosystems: Structure of interdependencies and firms’ innovative search, Academy of Management Review, 45, 646, 10.5465/amr.2017.0549 Gawer, 2020, Introduction to Part III Gawer, 2021, Digital platforms’ boundaries: The interplay of firm scope, platform sides, and digital interfaces, Long Range Planning, 54, 10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102045 Gawer, 2007, Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from Intel, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16, 1, 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00130.x Ghazawneh, 2013, Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model, Information Systems Journal, 23, 173, 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00406.x Giudici, 2018, Open-system orchestration as a relational source of sensing capabilities: Evidence from a venture association, Academy of Management Journal, 61, 1369, 10.5465/amj.2015.0573 Haddad, 2021, Situating innovation policy in Mediterranean Arab countries: A research agenda for context sensitivity, Research Policy, 50, 104273, 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104273 Hagiu, 2013, First-party content and coordination in two-sided markets, Management Science, 59, 933, 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1577 Helfat, 2018, Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems, Research Policy, 47, 1391, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.019 Henderson, 1990, Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9, 10.2307/2393549 Henfridsson, 2018, Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation, Information and Organization, 28, 89, 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.03.001 Hong, 2013, Developing new capabilities across a supplier network through boundary crossing: A case study of a China-based MNC subsidiary and its local suppliers, Organization Studies, 34, 377, 10.1177/0170840612467154 Huber, 2017, Governance practices in platform ecosystems: Navigating tensions between cocreated value and governance costs, Information Systems Research, 28, 563, 10.1287/isre.2017.0701 Iansiti, 2020 Iyengar, 2015, Information technology use as a learning mechanism: The impact of it use on knowledge transfer effectiveness, absorptive capacity, and franchisee performance, MIS Quarterly, 39, 615, 10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.3.05 Jacobides, 2018, Towards a theory of ecosystems, Strategic Management Journal (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 39, 2255 Jaspers, 2012, Organizing interindustry architectural innovations: Evidence from mobile communication applications, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29, 419, 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00915.x Kampker, 2017 Kapoor, 2018, Ecosystems: Broadening the locus of value creation, Journal of Organization Design, 7, 1, 10.1186/s41469-018-0035-4 Karhu, 2018, Exploiting and defending open digital platforms with boundary resources: Android’s five platform forks, Information Systems Research, 29, 479, 10.1287/isre.2018.0786 Kindermann, 2021, Digital orientation: Conceptualization and operationalization of a new strategic orientation, European Management Journal, 39, 645, 10.1016/j.emj.2020.10.009 Kusunoki, 2010, Redefining innovation as system re-definition Lee, 2012, Digital innovation and the division of innovative labor: Digital controls in the automotive industry, Organization Science, 23, 1428, 10.1287/orsc.1110.0707 Lusch, 2015, Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective, MIS Quarterly, 39, 155, 10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.07 Lyytinen, 2016, Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks, Information Systems Journal, 26, 47, 10.1111/isj.12093 MacInnis, 2011, A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing, Journal of Marketing, 75, 136, 10.1509/jmkg.75.4.136 Masucci, 2020, Removing bottlenecks in business ecosystems: The strategic role of outbound open innovation, Research Policy, 49, 10.1016/j.respol.2019.103823 McIntyre, 2017, Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps, Strategic Management Journal (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 38, 141 Mercedes-Benz Digital Challenge Mercedes–Benz/developers Mercedes–Benz/developers Milgrom, 1990, The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization, The American Economic Review, 80, 511 Nambisan, 2018, Architecture vs. ecosystem perspectives: Reflections on digital innovation, Information & Organization, 28, 104, 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.04.003 Nambisan, 2017, Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world, MIS Quarterly, 41, 223, 10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03 Nambisan, 2011, Orchestration processes in network-centric innovation: Evidence from the field, Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, 40 Nambisan, 2019, The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes, Research Policy, 48, 103773, 10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018 Newcomb, 2016, Inside Audi, BMW and Daimler’s $3 Billion Bet On HERE’s Mapping Business, Forbes. Nonaka, 1998, The concept of “Ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation, California Management Review, 40, 40, 10.2307/41165942 Ouchi, 1979, A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms, Management Science, 25, 833, 10.1287/mnsc.25.9.833 Ozalp, 2018, Disruption in platform‐based ecosystems, Journal of Management Studies (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 55, 1203 Pagani, 2013, Digital business strategy and value creation: Framing the dynamic cycle of control points, MIS Quarterly, 37, 617, 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.13 Paluch, 2020, Stage-gate and agile development in the digital age: Promises, perils, and boundary conditions, Journal of Business Research, 110, 495, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.063 Park, 2020, Organized complexity of digital business strategy: A configurational perspective, MIS Quarterly, 44, 85, 10.25300/MISQ/2020/14477 Parker, 2017, Platform ecosystems: How developers invert the firm, MIS Quarterly, 41, 255, 10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.13 Parker, 2001, Seeing another viewpoint: Antecedents and outcomes of employee perspective taking, Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1085, 10.2307/3069390 Parmigiani, 2009, Complementarity, capabilities, and the boundaries of the firm: The impact of within-firm and interfirm expertise on concurrent sourcing of complementary components, Strategic Management Journal (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 30, 1065 Pavlou, 2010, The ‘third hand’: IT-enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational capabilities, Information Systems Research, 21, 443, 10.1287/isre.1100.0280 Pentland, 2012, Dynamics of organizational routines: A generative model, Journal of Management Studies (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 49, 1484 Pierce, 2009, Big losses in ecosystem niches: How core firm decisions drive complementary product shakeouts, Strategic Management Journal, 30, 323, 10.1002/smj.736 Porter, 1980 Prencipe, 2003 Rietveld, 2021, Platform competition: A systematic and interdisciplinary review of the literature, Journal of Management, 47, 1528, 10.1177/0149206320969791 Sandberg, 2020, Digitization and phase transitions in platform organizing logics: evidence from the process automation industry, MIS Quarterly, 44, 129, 10.25300/MISQ/2020/14520 Schilke, 2014, Second-Order Dynamic Capabilities: How Do They Matter?, Academy of Management Perspectives, 28, 368, 10.5465/amp.2013.0093 Schreieck, 2021, Capabilities for value co-creation and value capture in emergent platform ecosystems: A longitudinal case study of SAP’s cloud platform, Journal of Information Technology, 36, 365, 10.1177/02683962211023780 Schulze, 2022, How dynamic capabilities change ordinary capabilities: Reconnecting attention control and problem-solving, Strategic Management Journal, 10.1002/smj.3413 Song, 2018, The ecosystem of software platform: A study of asymmetric cross-side network effects and platform governance, MIS Quarterly, 42, 121, 10.25300/MISQ/2018/13737 Star, 1989, Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39, Social Studies of Science, 19, 387, 10.1177/030631289019003001 Steininger, 2022, Dynamic capabilities in information systems research: A critical review, synthesis of current knowledge, and recommendations for future research, JAIS Preprints (Forthcoming). Svahn, 2017, Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: How volvo cars managed competing concerns, MIS Quarterly, 41, 239, 10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.12 Swanson, 1997, The organizing vision in information systems innovation, Organization Science, 8, 458, 10.1287/orsc.8.5.458 Tan, 2015, The role of IS capabilities in the development of multi-sided platforms: The digital ecosystem strategy of Alibaba.com, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 10.17705/1jais.00393 Teece, 1986, Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy, Research Policy, 15, 285, 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 Teece, 2007, Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance, Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319, 10.1002/smj.640 Tiwana, 2015, Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems, Information Systems Research, 26, 266, 10.1287/isre.2015.0573 Tiwana, 2010, Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics, Information Systems Research, 21, 675, 10.1287/isre.1100.0323 Vaast, 2006, Multiple faces of codification: Organizational redesign in an IT organization, Organization Science, 17, 190, 10.1287/orsc.1050.0171 Van Alstyne, 2016, Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy, Harvard Business Review, 94, 54 Van de Ven, 2011, Breakdowns in implementing models of organization change, Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, 58 Venkatraman, 2014 Volkswagen OKAPI Wang, 2021, Connecting the parts with the whole: Toward an information ecology theory of digital innovation ecosystems, MIS Quarterly, 45, 397, 10.25300/MISQ/2021/15864 Wareham, 2014, Technology ecosystem governance, Organization Science, 25, 1195, 10.1287/orsc.2014.0895 Webster, 2002, Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review, MIS Quarterly, 26, xiii Wen, 2019, Threat of platform‐owner entry and complementor responses: Evidence from the mobile app market, Strategic Management Journal (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 40, 1336 Winter, 2003, Understanding dynamic capabilities, Strategic Management Journal (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 24, 991 Wulf, 2020, Fostering value creation with digital platforms: A unified theory of the application programming interface design, Journal of Management Information Systems, 37, 251, 10.1080/07421222.2019.1705514 Yayavaram, 2018, Role of search for domain knowledge and architectural knowledge in alliance partner selection, Strategic Management Journal (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 39, 2277 Ye, 2018, User service innovation on mobile phone platforms: Investigating impacts of lead userness, toolkit support, and design autonomy, MIS Quarterly, 42, 165, 10.25300/MISQ/2018/12361 Yoo, 2012, Organizing for innovation in the digitized world, Organization Science, 23, 1398, 10.1287/orsc.1120.0771 Yoo, 2010, The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research, Information Systems Research, 21, 724, 10.1287/isre.1100.0322 Zhu, 2019, Friends or foes? Examining platform owners’ entry into complementors’ spaces, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 28, 23 Zittrain, 2007, Saving the Internet, Harvard Business Review, 85, 49 Zobel, 2020, Implications of open innovation for organizational boundaries and the governance of contractual relations, Academy of Management Perspectives, 34, 400, 10.5465/amp.2016.0175 Zollo, 2002, Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities, Organization Science, 13, 339, 10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780 Zuzul, 2019, ‘Matter battles’: Cognitive representations, boundary objects, and the failure of collaboration in two smart cities, Academy of Management Journal, 62, 739, 10.5465/amj.2016.0625