Dynamic Simulation Model for Estimating In-situ Production Quantity of PC Members

Jeeyoung Lim1, Sunkuk Kim2, Joseph J. Kim1,2
1Department of Civil Engineering and Construction Engineering Management, California State University, Long Beach, USA
2Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Korea

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Wang C, Liu M, Hsiang SM, Leming ML (2011) Causes and penalties of variation: case study of a precast concrete slab production facility. J Constr Eng Manag 138(6):775–785. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000475

Sacks R, Eastman CM, Lee G (2001) Process model perspectives on management and engineering procedures in the precast/prestressed concrete industry. J Constr Eng Manag 130(2):206–215. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:2(206)

Badir YF, Kadir MA, Hashim AH (2002) Industrialized building systems construction in Malaysia. J Archit Eng 8(1):19–23. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2002)8:1(19)

Chan WT, Hu H (2002) Constraint programming approach to precast production scheduling. J Constr Eng Manag 128(6):513–521. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:6(513)

Ma Z, Yang Z, Liu S, Wu S (2018) Optimized rescheduling of multiple production lines for flowshop production of reinforced precast concrete components. Autom Constr 95:86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.08.002

Yang Z, Ma Z, Wu S (2016) Optimized flowshop scheduling of multiple production lines for precast production. Autom Constr 72:321–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.021

Kim MK, Cheng JC, Sohn H, Chang CC (2015) A framework for dimensional and surface quality assessment of precast concrete elements using BIM and 3D laser scanning. Autom Constr 49:225–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.07.010

Wang Q, Kim MK, Cheng JC, Sohn H (2016) Automated quality assessment of precast concrete elements with geometry irregularities using terrestrial laser scanning. Autom Constr 68:170–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.03.014

Polat G (2008) Factors affecting the use of precast concrete systems in the United States. J Const Eng Manag 134(3):169–178. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:3(169)

Yee AA (2001) Structural and economic benefits of precast/prestressed concrete construction. PCI J 46(4):34–42

Lim J, Son S, Kim JT, Kim S (2017) Experimental study of in situ production of precast concrete members, In: 7th International Conference on construction engineering and project management(ICCEPM), Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management, Chengdu, China

Hong WK, Lee G, Lee S, Kim S (2014) Algorithms for in situ production layout of composite precast concrete members. Autom Constr 41:50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.02.005

Lim C(2016) Construction planning model for in situ production and installation of composite precast concrete frame, Doctoral dissertation, Kyung Hee University

Oh OJ (2017) A model for production and erection integration management of large scale PC structures using system dynamics, Doctoral dissertation, Kyung Hee University

Lim J (2018) A risk management model for in situ production of precast concrete members focused on time and cost using system dynamics, Doctoral dissertation, Kyung Hee University

Lee D, Lim C, Kim S (2016) CO2 emission reduction effects of an innovative composite precast concrete structure applied to heavy loaded and long span buildings. Energy Build 126:36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.022

Lim J, Kim S (2020) Evaluation of co2 emission reduction effect using in situ production of precast concrete components. J Asian Archit Build Eng 19(2):176–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2020.1726763

Moon KJ (2001) A study on the sustainability of an urban system: by the application of a system dynamics model, Doctoral dissertation, Pusan National University

Choi J, Kim H, Kim I (2015) Open BIM-based quantity take-off system for schematic estimation of building frame in early design stage. J Comput Des and Eng 2(1):16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2014.11.002

Gransberg DD, Riemer C (2009) Impact of inaccurate engineer’s estimated quantities on unit price ontracts. J Constr Eng Manag 135(11):1138–1145. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000084

Hyari KH, Shatarat N, Khalafallah A (2017) Handling risks of quantity variations in unit-price contracts. J Constr Eng Manag 143(10):04017079. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001393

Yeh IC (1998) Quantity estimating of building with logarithm-neuron networks. J Constr Eng Manag 124(5):374–380. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:5(374)

Cheng TM, Feng CW, Hsu MY (2006) An integrated modeling mechanism for optimizing the simulation model of the construction operation. Autom Constr 15(3):327–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2005.06.016

Cheng TM, Yan RZ (2009) Integrating messy genetic algorithms and simulation to optimize resource utilization. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 24(6):401–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2008.00588.x

Cho GH, Kim JJ (1996) Integrated management of the production, transportation and installation of precast concrete panels. J Archit Inst Korea 12(3):185–193

Tan B, Huat DCK, Messner JI, Horman MJ (2004) Using simulation for pull-driven scheduling with buffer for precast concrete component fabrication and erection. In: 16th CIB World building congress, international council for research and innovation in building and construction

Cheng TM, Feng CW (2003) An effective simulation mechanism for construction operations. Autom Constr 12(3):227–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(02)00086-9

Lee SH (2013) Dynamic scheduling model for column-beam system buildings by composite precast concrete members, Doctoral dissertation, Kyung Hee University

Lee S, Hong WK, Lim C, Kim S (2015) A dynamic erection simulation model of column-beam structures using composite precast concrete components. J Intell Rob Syst 79(3–4):537–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-014-0115-9

Forrester JW (1987) Lessons from system dynamics modeling. Syst Dyn Rev 3(2):136–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260030205