Dynamic Activities for Managing an IS-Enabled Organizational Change
Tóm tắt
The interpretive grounded theory (GT) study analyses information system (IS) enabled organizational change in two private sector organizations. These two organizations, who are long term partners, were developing a new IS product to divergent markets. The data was gathered through 15 interviews, conducted at the phase of initial rollouts. The findings focus on the results of the theoretical coding phase in which selective codes, referred to as change management activities, are related to each other. As a theoretical contribution, the dynamic structure presents how the change management activities appear differently, depending on a set of choices. Several paradoxical situations stemmed from inconsistencies and/or tensions, because the choices did not support the targeted change management activities. The study thus proposes that there is an increasing demand to analyze the sources of paradoxical situations. Paradoxical situations in these five opposing forces were identified: long term vs. short term, macro vs. micro, past vs. future, centralized vs. distributed, and control vs. trust/self-organization. Some paradoxical situations arose because of the nature of the trust-based IS partnership, while others were socially constructed as a result of unintended consequences of actions in relation to the strategic goals. Managerial efforts are increasingly required for identifying paradoxical situations at an early stage and for considering the right balance for the opposing forces in the dynamic IS change process.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Akkermans H, van Helden K (2002) Vicious and virtuous cycles in ERP implementation: a case study of interrelations between critical success factors. Eur J Inf Syst 11(1):35–46
Allen DK, Colligan D, Finnie A, Kern T (2000) Trust, power and interorganizational information systems: the case of the electronic trading community TransLease. Inf Syst J 10(1):21–40
Argyris C (1988) Crafting a theory of practice: the case of organizational paradoxes. In: Quinn RE, Cameron RS (eds) Paradox and transformation: toward a theory of change in organization and management. Ballinger, Cambridge, pp 255–278
Argyris C (1993) Knowledge for action: a guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. ERIC Number: ED357268. ISBN-1-55542-519-4, p 309
Arrow KJ (1985) Informational structure of the firm. Am Econ Rev 75(2):303–307
Arvidsson V, Holmström J, Lyytinen K (2014) Information systems use as strategy practice: a multi-dimensional view of strategic information system implementation and use. J Strateg Inf Syst 23(1):45–61
Bassellier G, Benbasat I (2004) Business competence of information technology professionals: conceptual development and influence on IT-business partnerships. MIS Q 28(4):673–694
Besson P, Rowe F (2012) Strategizing information systems-enabled organizational transformation: a transdisciplinary review and new directions. J Strateg Inf Syst 21(2):103–124
Bower JL, Gilbert CG (eds) (2005) From resource allocation to strategy. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ Sci 15(5):555–568
Carlo JL, Lyytinen K, Boland RJ Jr (2012) Dialectics of collective minding: contradictory appropriations of information technology in a high-risk project. MIS Q 36(4):1081–1108
Cheng J, Fu Y (2013) Inter-organizational relationships and knowledge sharing through the relationship and institutional orientations in supply chains. Int J Inf Manag 33(3):473–484
Chua CEH, Lim W, Soh C, Sia SK (2012) Enacting clan control in complex IT projects: a social capital perspective. MIS Q 36(2):577–600
Corley KG (2015) A commentary on “What grounded theory is…” engaging a phenomenon from the perspective of those living it. Organ Res Methods 18(4):600–605
Dittrich Y (2014) Software engineering beyond the project–sustaining software ecosystems. Inf Softw Technol 56(11):1436–1456
Doolin B, McLeod L (2012) Sociomateriality and boundary objects in information systems development. Eur J Inf Syst 21(5):570–586
Eisenhardt KM (1985) Control: organizational and economic approaches. Manag Sci 31(2):134–149
Fisk A, Berente N, Lyytinen K (2010) Boundary spanning competencies and information system development project success. In: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on information systems, St. Louis, pp 1–14
Forrester JW (1995) The beginning of system dynamics. McKinsey Q 4:17
Gatignon H, Tushman ML, Smith W, Anderson P (2002) A structural approach to assessing innovation: construct development of innovation locus, type, and characteristics. Manag Sci 48(9):1103–1122
Gersick CJ (1991) Revolutionary change theories: a multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Acad Manag Rev 16(1):10–36
Glaser BG (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. The Sociology Press, California
Glaser BG (1992) Basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, California
Glaser BG (1998) Doing grounded theory: issues and discussions. Sociology Press, California
Glaser BG (2005) The grounded theory perspective III: Theoretical coding. Sociology Press, California
Gregor S (2006) The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Q 30(3):611–642
Guillemette MG, Paré G (2012) Toward a new theory of the contribution of the IT function in organizations. MIS Q 36(2):529–551
Hanseth O, Lyytinen K (2010) Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet. J Inf Technol 25(1):1–19
Heiskanen A, Hekkala R, Newman M, Eklin M (2013) The socio-technical change and PSIC models as lenses to view three consecutive public sector is projects. In: Proceedings of European conference on information systems. http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2013_cr/35/. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
Huy QN (2002) Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: the contribution of middle managers. Adm Sci Q 47(1):31–69
Kirsch LS (1997) Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Inf Syst Res 8(3):215–239
Kirsch LJ, Sambamurthy V, Ko D, Purvis RL (2002) Controlling information systems development projects: the view from the client. Manag Sci 48(4):484–498
Leavitt HJ (1964) Applied organization change in industry: structural, technical and human approaches. In: Cooper WW, Leavitt HJ, Shelly MW (eds) New perspectives in organization research. Wiley, New York
Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strateg Manag J 13(S1):111–125
Leonardi PM (2012) Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: what do these terms mean? How are they related? Do we need them? In: Leonardi PM, Nardi BA, Kallinikos J (eds) Materiality and organizing: social interaction in a technological world. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 25–48
Levina N, Vaast E (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Q 29(2):335–363
Lewis MW (2000) Exploring paradox: toward a more comprehensive guide. Acad Manag Rev 25(4):760–776
Lewis MW, Welsh MA, Dehler GE, Green SG (2002) Product development tensions: exploring contrasting styles of project management. Acad Manag J 45(3):546–564
Lewis MW, Andriopoulos C, Smith WK (2014) Paradoxical leadership to enable strategic agility. Calif Manag Rev 56(3):58–77
Luna-Reyes LF, Zhang J, Gil-García JR, Cresswell AM (2005) Information systems development as emergent socio-technical change: a practice approach. Eur J Inf Syst 14(1):93–105
Lüscher LS, Lewis MW (2008) Organizational change and managerial sense making: working through paradox. Acad Manag J 51(2):221–240
Lyytinen K, Newman M (2008) Explaining information systems change: a punctuated socio-technical change model. Eur J Inf Syst 17(6):589–613
Lyytinen K, Newman M (2014) A tale of two coalitions—marginalising the users while successfully implementing an enterprise resource planning system. Inf Syst J 25(2):71–101
March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):71–87
Markus L, Robey D (1988) Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research. Manag Sci 34(5):583–598
McGrath JE (ed) (1982) Dilemmatics: the study of research choices and dilemmas. Judgment Calls in Research. Sage Publications Beverly Hills, CA, pp 69–80
McLeod L, Doolin B (2012) Information systems development as situated socio-technical change: a process approach. Eur J Inf Syst 21(2):176–191
Mintzberg H, Westley F (1992) Cycles of organizational change. Strateg Manag J 13(S2):39–59
Mitchell VL (2006) Knowledge integration and information technology project performance. MIS Q 30(4):919–939
Newman M, Robey D (1992) A social process model of user-analyst relationships. MIS Q 18:249–266
Orlikowski WJ (1992) The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ Sci 3(3):398–427
Orlikowski WJ (1993) CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Q 17(3):309–340
Orlikowski WJ (2007) Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organ Stud 28(9):1435–1448
Orlikowski WJ (2010) The sociomateriality of organizational life: considering technology in management research. Camb J Econ 34(1):125–141
Ouchi WG (1979) A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Manag Sci 25(9):833–848
Pee LG, Kankanhalli A, Kim H (2010) Knowledge sharing in information systems development: a social interdependence perspective. J AIS 11(10):550–575
Pettigrew AM (1990) Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organ Sci 1(3):267–292
Pfeffer J (1997) New directions for organization theory: problems and prospects. Oxford University Press, New York
Poole MS, Van de Ven AH (1989) Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):562–578
Putnam LL, Poole MS (1987) Conflict and negotiation. In: Jablin FM, Putnam LL, Roberts KH, Porter LW (eds) Handbook of organizational communication. Sage, Newbury Park
Romanelli E, Tushman ML (1994) Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: an empirical test. Acad Manag J 37(5):1141–1166
Sabherwal R, Robey D (1995) Reconciling variance and process strategies for studying information system development. Inf Syst Res 6(4):303–327
Schein EH (1996) Kurt Lewin’s change theory in the field and in the classroom: notes toward a model of managed learning. Syst Practice 9(1):27–47
Seo M, Creed WD (2002) Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: a dialectical perspective. Acad Manag Rev 27(2):222–247
Smith WK (2014) Dynamic decision making: a model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Acad Manag J 57(6):1592–1623
Smith WK, Lewis MW (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad Manag Rev 36(2):381–403
Stacey RD (1995) The science of complexity: an alternative perspective for strategic change processes. Strateg Manag J 16(6):477–495
Tsoukas H, Chia R (2002) On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change. Organ Sci 13(5):567–582
Tushman M, Nadler D (1992) Designing organizations that have good fit: a framework for understanding new architectures. In: Gerstein M, Nadler D, Shaw R (eds) Organization architecture. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 39–56
Tushman M, Romanelli E (1985) Organizational evolution: interactions between external and emergent processes and strategic choice. Res Organ Behav 8:171–222
Tushman ML, Newman WH, Romanelli E (1986) Convergence and upheaval: managing the unsteady pace of organizational evolution. Calif Manag Rev 29(1):29–44
Urquhart C (2012) Grounded Theory for qualitative research: a practical guide. SAGE Publications
Urquhart C, Fernandez WD (2006) Grounded theory method: the researcher as blank slate and other Myths. In: The International Conference on Information Systems, 2006 Milwaukee, WI, USA
Urquhart C, Fernández W (2013) Using grounded theory method in information systems: the researcher as blank slate and other myths. J Inf Technol 28(3):224–236
Van de Ven AH, Poole MS (1995) Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):510–540
Weick KE, Quinn RE (1999) Organizational change and development. Ann Rev Psychol 50(1):361–386