Nghĩa vụ Thận trọng trong Luật Môi trường Quốc tế và Luật Nhân quyền Quốc tế: Một Nghiên cứu So sánh Pháp lý về Các đóng góp được xác định trên cơ sở quốc gia theo Thỏa thuận Paris và Các nghĩa vụ tích cực theo Công ước Châu Âu về Nhân quyền

Akandji-Kombe J-F (2007) Positive obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights: a guide to the implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights. Council of Europe, Strasbourg

Arai-Takahashi Y (2002) The margin of appreciation doctrine and the principle of proportionality in the jurisprudence of the ECHR. Intersentia, New York

Aust HP, Feihle P (2020) Due diligence in the history of the codification of the law on state responsibility. In: Krieger H, Peters A, Kreuzer L (eds) Due diligence in the international legal order. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 42–58

Baade B (2020) Due diligence and the duty to protect human rights. In: Krieger H, Peters A, Kreuzer L (eds) Due diligence in the international legal order. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 92–108

Bannelier-Christakis K (2015) Cyber diligence: a low-intensity due diligence principle for low-intensity cyber operations? Baltic Yearb Int Law 14:23–39

Barnidge RP Jr (2006) The due diligence principle under international law. Int Community Law Rev 8:81–121

Barnidge RP Jr (2008) Non-state actors and terrorism: applying the law of state responsibility and the due diligence principle. TMC Asser Press, The Hague

Bartolini G (2020) The historical roots of the due diligence standard. In: Krieger H, Peters A, Kreuzer L (eds) Due diligence in the international legal order. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 23–41

Birnie PW, Boyle AE, Redgwell C (2009) International law and the environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Black-Branch J (2016) Due diligence as a legal concept to ensure security and safety of peaceful uses of nuclear energy as well as non-proliferation and disarmament obligations. In: Nuclear non-proliferation in international law, vol III: Legal aspects of the use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. TMC Asser Press, The Hague

Bodansky D (1993) The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: a commentary. Yale J Int Law Online 18:451

Bodansky D (2016) The legal character of the Paris Agreement. Rev Eur Community Int Environ Law 25:142–150

Bodansky D, Brunnée J, Rajamani L (2017) International climate change law. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Boyle AE, Harrison J (2013) Judicial settlement of international environmental disputes: current problems. J Int Dispute Settl 4:245–276

Bratspies RM, Miller RA (2006) Introduction. In: Bratspies RM, Miller RA (eds) Transboundary harm in international law: lessons from the Trail Smelter Arbitration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–10

Brilmayer L (2007) From ‘contract’ to ‘pledge’: the structure of international human rights agreements. British Yearb Int Law 77:163–202

Brownlie I (1983) State responsibility: part 1. Clarendon Press, Oxford

Brus MMTA (2016) Het klimaatakkoord van Parijs: bouwen aan wereldrecht of bewijs van falende internationale samenwerking? [The Paris climate agreement: contribution to building world law or proof of failing international cooperation?]. Ars Aequi 65:615–623

Cançado Trindade AA (2015) Principle 15. In: Viñuales JE (ed) The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development: a commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 403–428

Carozza PG (2003) Subsidiarity as a structural principle of international human rights law. Am J Int Law 97:38–79

Chinkin CM (2018) Human rights. In: Bowman MJ, Kritsiotis D (eds) Conceptual and contextual perspectives on the modern law of treaties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 509–537

Coco A, de Souza Dias T (2020a) Part I: Due diligence and COVID-19: states’ duties to prevent and halt the coronavirus outbreak. EJIL: Talk! (24 March 2020). https://www.ejiltalk.org/part-i-due-diligence-and-covid-19-states-duties-to-prevent-and-halt-the-coronavirus-outbreak/. Accessed 13 Aug 2020

Coco A, de Souza Dias T (2020b) Part II: Due diligence and COVID-19: states’ duties to prevent and halt the coronavirus outbreak. EJIL: Talk! (25 March 2020). https://www.ejiltalk.org/part-ii-due-diligence-and-covid-19-states-duties-to-prevent-and-halt-the-coronavirus-outbreak/. Accessed 3 Oct 2020

Coco A, de Souza Dias T (2020c) Part III: Due diligence and COVID-19: states’ duties to prevent and halt the coronavirus outbreak. EJIL: Talk! (25 March 2020). https://www.ejiltalk.org/part-iii-due-diligence-and-covid-19-states-duties-to-prevent-and-halt-the-coronavirus-outbreak/. Accessed 24 Jan 2021

Craven M (2000) Legal differentiation and the concept of the human rights treaty in international law. Eur J Int Law 11:489–519

Crawford J (2013) State responsibility: the general part. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Dupuy PM (1999) Reviewing the difficulties of codification: on Ago’s classification of obligations of means and obligations of result in relation to state responsibility. Eur J Int Law 10:371–385

Duvic-Paoli L-A (2018) The prevention principle in international environmental law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Eagleton C (1928) The responsibility of states in international law. New York University Press, New York

Economides CP (2010) Content of the obligation: obligations of means and obligations of result. In: Crawford J, Pellet A, Olleson S (eds) The law of international responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 371–381

Ellis J (2006) Has international law outgrown Trail Smelter? In: Bratspies RM, Miller RA (eds) Transboundary harm in international law: lessons from the Trail Smelter Arbitration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 56–65

Evrigenis D (1982) Recent case-law of the European Court of Human Rights on Articles 8 and 10 of the ECHR. Hum Rights Law J 3:121–139

Fitzmaurice M (2020) Due diligence in the use of international watercourses. In: Krieger H, Peters A, Kreuzer L (eds) Due diligence in the international legal order. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 129–146

Foster CE (2010) Burden of proof in international courts and tribunals. Aust Yearb Int Law 29:27–86

French D (1998) 1997 Kyoto Protocol to the 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. J Environ Law 10:227–239

Gałuskina K (2017) Le standard juridique de bon père de famille et la symétrie entre les expressions bon père de famille et bonne mère de famille en droit français. Roczniki Humanistyczne 65:75–86

Gattini A (2014) Breach of international obligations. In: Nollkaemper A, Plakokefalos I (eds) Principles of shared responsibility in international law: an appraisal of the state of the art. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 25–59

Hakimi M (2010) State bystander responsibility. Eur J Int Law 21:341–385

Koivurova T (2010) Due diligence. Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law (February 2010). https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1034?prd=OPIL. Accessed 16 Mar 2021

Koningsveld H (2006) Het Verschijnsel Wetenschap [The Phenomenon of Science]. Uitgeverij Boom, Amsterdam

Kotzur M (2009) Good faith (Bona fide). Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law (January 2009). https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1412?prd=OPIL. Accessed 15 Dec 2020

Kratochvil J (2011) The inflation of the margin of appreciation by the European Court of Human Rights. Neth Q Hum Rights 29:324–357

Krieger H, Peters A (2020) Due diligence and structural change in the international legal order. In: Krieger H, Peters A, Kreuzer L (eds) Due diligence in the international legal order. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 351–390

Kulesza J (2016) Due diligence in international law. Brill Nijhoff, Boston

Longobardo M (2019) The relevance of the concept of due diligence for international humanitarian law. Wis Int Law J 37:44–87

Longobardo M (2020) Due diligence in international humanitarian law. In: Krieger H, Peters A, Kreuzer L (eds) Due diligence in the international legal order. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 183–199

Luca Burci G (2020) The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus: are the international health regulations fit for purpose? EJIL: Talk! (27 February 2020). https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-outbreak-of-covid-19-coronavirus-are-the-international-health-regulations-fit-for-purpose/. Accessed 24 Jan 2021

Mace MJ (2016) Mitigation commitments under the Paris Agreement and the way forward. Climate Law 6:21–39

Mayer B (2018) Obligations of conduct in international law on climate change: a defence. Rev Eur Comp Int Environ Law 27:130–140

McManus IC, Freegard M, Moore J, Rawles R (2010) Science in the making: right hand, left hand. II: the duck-rabbit figure. Laterality 15:166–185

Mégret F (2018) Nature of obligations. In: Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, Harris D (eds) International human rights law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 86–109

Moons N (2018) The right to housing in law and society. Routledge, New York

Mowbray AR (2004) The development of positive obligations under the European Convention of Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights. Hart Publishing, Hart

Nicolae I (2014) A comparative analysis regarding the obligation of result and the obligation of conduct (of means) in civil law. Bull Transilv Univ Braşov Ser VII Soc Sci Law 7:155–162

Papanicolopulu I (2020) Due diligence in the law of the sea. In: Krieger H, Peters A, Kreuzer L (eds) Due diligence in the international legal order. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 147–162

Parisi F (1994) Alterum non laedere: an intellectual history of civil liability. Am J Jurisprud 39:317–351

Peters A, Krieger H, Kreuzer L (2020) Due diligence in the international legal order: dissecting the leitmotif of current accountability debates. In: Peters A, Krieger H, Kreuzer L (eds) Due diligence in the international legal order. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–19

Pisillo-Mazzeschi R (1992) The due diligence rule and the nature of international responsibility of states. German Yearb Int Law 35:9–51

Rajamani L (2016) The 2015 Paris Agreement: interplay between hard, soft and non-obligations. J Environ Law 28:337–358

Rajamani L (2020) Due diligence in international climate change law. In: Krieger H, Peters A, Kreuzer L (eds) Due diligence in the international climate change law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 163–180

Reuter P (1958) Droit international public. Presses universitaires de France, Paris

Sands P, Peel J, Fabra A, MacKenzie R (2018) Principles of international environmental law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Sarkin J (2018) A methodology to ensure that states adequately apply due diligence standards and processes to significantly impact levels of violence against women around the world. Hum Rights Q 40:1–36

Schmitt MN (2015) In defense of due diligence in cyberspace. Yale Law J Forum 125:68–81

Schröder M (2014) Precautionary approach/principle. Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law (March 2014). https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1603?prd=OPIL. Accessed 25 Aug 2020

Schwartz J-L, Grimault N, Hupé J-M et al (2012) Multistability in perception: binding sensory modalities, an overview. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 367:896–905

Shelton D, Gould A (2013) Positive and negative obligations. In: Shelton D (ed) The Oxford Handbook of international human rights law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 563–584

Sicilianos L-A (2002) The classification of obligations and the multilateral dimension of the relations of international responsibility. Eur J Int Law 13:1127–1145

Simma B (2008) Reciprocity. Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law (April 2008). https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1461?prd=OPIL. Accessed 19 Jan 2021

Simpson AWB (2003) Britain and the Genocide Convention. Br Yearb Int Law 73:5–64

Stoyanova V (2020) Due diligence versus positive obligations: critical reflections on the Council of Europe Convention on Violence against Women. In: Niemi J, Peroni L, Stoyanova V (eds) International law and violence against women: Europe and the Istanbul Convention. Routledge. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3384607. Accessed 26 Mar 2021

Strasser KA (1996) Preventing pollution. Fordham Environ Law J 8:1–57

Toebes BC et al (2020) Toward human rights-consistent responses to health emergencies: what is the overlap between core right to health obligations and core international health regulation capacities? Health Hum Rights 22:99–112

Viñuales JE (2020) Due diligence in international environmental law: a fine-grained cartography. In: Krieger H, Peters A, Kreuzer L (eds) Due diligence in the international legal order. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 111–128

Violi F (2020) The function of the triad ‘territory’, ‘jurisdiction’ and ‘control’ in due diligence obligations. In: Krieger H, Peters A, Kreuzer L (eds) Due diligence in the international legal order. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 75–91

Voigt C (2016) The Paris Agreement: what is the standard of conduct for parties? Quest Int Law 26:17–18

Westerman PC (2008) Normering via doelstelling: zorgplichten [Standardisation through objective: duties of care]. In: Westerman PC, Mackor AR (eds) Vormen van (de?)regulering [Forms of (de?)regulation]. Boom Juridische uitgevers, Den Haag, pp 51–72

Westerman PC (2013) Recht als raadsel: een inleiding in de rechtsfilosofie [Law as a riddle: an introduction to legal philosophy]. Uitgeverij Paris, Zutphen

Westerman PC (2018) Outsourcing the law: a philosophical perspective on regulation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

Winkler H (2017) Mitigation (Article 4). In: Klein D, Carazo MP, Doelle M et al (eds) The Paris Agreement on climate change: analysis and commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 141–165

Wouters J (2007) Bronnen van het Internationaal Recht [Sources of international law]. In: Horbach N, Lefeber R, Ribbelink O (eds) Handboek internationaal recht [Handbook international law]. TMC Asser Press, The Hague, pp 81–122

Zimmerman R (1996) The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Oxford University Press, Oxford