Dry deposition of particles to a pine plantation
Tóm tắt
There has been some controversy concerning the rate of deposition of particles having diameters near 1.0 μm to vegetated surfaces. In this size range, the processes of Brownian diffusion and inertial impaction are not effective and deposition to smooth surfaces reaches a minimum. However, most measurements of deposition of micrometer diameter particles to vegetated surfaces indicate a greater deposition than extrapolation of the results from less rough surfaces would suggest. In this study, the aerodynamic profile method was used to estimate deposition to a pine plantation. The deposition velocities were found to be sensitive to the displacement height and the form of the profile stability correction used in the calculations. An analysis of a limited set of Bowen ratio data, collected over the same forest, suggests that the data are reasonably described by using a displacement height of 7.9 m and the stability correction proposed by Raupach (1979). The average deposition velocities, measured over a 9-month period were 0.0043, 0.0078, and 0.0092 m/s for the three diameter classes 0.5\2-1.0, 1.0\2-2.0 and 2.0\2-5.0 \gmm. These deposition velocities are lower than the corresponding aerodynamic conductance for the same periods, indicating that the deposition rate is limited by surface phenomena. Average surface conductances calculated for the three size classes of particles were 0.0060, 0.0141, and 0.0276 m/s, respectively. A multiple regression analysis showed high correlation between deposition velocity and wind speed. No other measured environmental factor or linear combination of factors was significantly correlated with deposition velocity.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bowen, I. S.: 1926, ‘The Ratio of Heat Losses by Conduction and by Evaporation from Any Water Surface’, Phys. Rev. 27, 779–787.
Brownlee, K. A.: 1965, Statistical Theory and Methodology: In Science and Engineering, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, pp. 62–63.
Cadle, R. D.: 1975, The Measurement of Airbourne Particles, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, pp. 319–325.
Chamberlain, A. C.: 1975, ‘The Movement of Particles in Plant Communities’, in J. L. Monteith (ed.), Vegetation and the Atmosphere, Academic Press, London, p. 57.
Chamberlain, A. C. and Little, P.: 1981, ‘Transport and Capture of Particles by Vegetation’, in J. Grace, E. D. Ford, and P. G. Jarvis (eds.), Plants and Their Atmospheric Environment. Blackwell Scientific Publ., Oxford, pp. 147–174.
Dyer, A. J. and Hicks, B. B.: 1970, ‘Flux-Gradient Relationships in the Constant Flux Layer’, Quart. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 75, 89–103.
Garland, J. A.: 1982, ‘Dry Deposition of Small Particles to Grass in Field Conditions’, in H. R. Pruppacher, R. G. Semonin and W. G. N. Slinn (eds.), Precipitation Scavenging, Dry Deposition and Resuspension, Elsevier Pub. Co., pp. 849–857.
Hicks, B. B., Wesely, M. L., Coulter, R. L., Hart, R. L., Durham, J. L., Speer, R. E., and Stedman, D. H.: 1982, ‘An Experimental Study of Sulfur Deposition to Grassland’, in H. R. Pruppacher, R. G. Semonin and W. G. N. Slinn (eds.), Precipitation Scavenging, Dry Deposition and Resuspension, Elsevier Pub. Co., pp. 933–950.
Hicks, B. B., Wesely, M. L., and Durham, J. L.: 1980, ‘Critique of Methods to Measure Dry Deposition’, EPA-600/9-80-050.
Hofken, K. D., Meixner, F. X., and Ehhalt, D. H.: 1982, ‘Deposition of Atmospheric Trace Constituents onto Different Natural Surfaces’, in H. R. Pruppacher, R. G. Semonin and W. G. N. Slinn (eds.), Precipitation Scavenging, Dry Deposition and Resuspension, Elsevier Pub. Co., pp. 825–833.
Kvalseth, T. O.: 1985, ‘Cautionary Note about R 2’, The American Statistician 39, 279–285.
Lorenz, R. and Murphy, C. E. Jr.: 1985, ‘Sulfur Dioxide, Carbon Dioxide and Water Vapor Flux Measurements Utilizing a Microprocessor-Controlled Data Acquisition System in a Pine Plantation’, in The Forest-Atmosphere Interaction, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 133–147.
McMahon, T. A. and Denison, P. J.: 1979, ‘Emperical Atmospheric Deposition Parameters - A Survey’, Atmos. Env. 13, 571–584.
Murphy, C. E. Jr.: 1985, ‘Carbon Dioxide and Growth of a Pine Plantation’, Forest Ecology and Management 11, 203–224.
Nicholson, K. W. and Davies, T. D.: 1987, ‘Field Measurements of the Dry Deposition of Particulate Sulphate’, Atmos. Environment 21, 1561–1571.
Raupach, M. R.: 1979, ‘Anomalies in Flux-Gradient Relationships Over Forest’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 16, 467–486.
Sehmel, G. A.: 1980, ‘Particle and Gas Dry Deposition: A Review’, Atmos. Env. 14, 983–1011.
Sievering, H.: 1982, ‘Eddy Flux and Profile Measurements of Small-Particle Dry-Deposition Velocity at the Boulder Atmospheric Observatory’, in H. R. Pruppacher, R. G. Semonin and W. G. N. Slinn (eds.), Precipitation Scavenging, Dry Deposition and Resuspension, Elsevier Pub. Co., pp. 963–977.
Slinn, W. G.: 1982, ‘Predictions for Particle Deposition to Vegetative Canopies’, Atmos. Env. 16, 1785–1794.
Sutton, O. G.; 1953, Micrometeorology, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, p. 238.
Thom, A. S.: 1975, ‘Momentum, Mass and Heat Exchange of Plant Communities’, in J. L. Monteith (ed.), Vegetation and the Atmosphere, Academic Press, London, p. 57.
Thom, A. S., Stewart, J. B., Oliver, H. R., and Gash, J. H. C.: 1975, ‘Comparison of Aerodynamic and Energy Budget Estimates of Fluxes Over a Pine Forest’, Quart. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 101, 93–105.
Thom, A. S.: 1971, ‘Momentum Absorption by Vegetation’, Quart. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 97, 414–428.