Drought stress adaptation: metabolic adjustment and regulation of gene expression

Plant Breeding - Tập 132 Số 1 - Trang 21-32 - 2013
S. Bhargava1, Kshitija Sawant1
1Department of Botany University of Pune Ganeshkhind Pune Maharashtra 411007 India

Tóm tắt

AbstractPlants cope with drought stress by manipulating key physiological processes like photosynthesis, respiration, water relations, antioxidant and hormonal metabolism. There exist multiple and often redundant stress sensors, which transduce the stress signal through secondary signalling molecules to the nucleus, where the expression of stress‐response genes is regulated. Transcription factors play an important role in regulating the expression of the stress‐response genes. Another level of regulation of gene expression is at the epigenetic level and involves modifications either at the chromatin level or at the mRNA level. Crop plants show various adaptive and acclimatization strategies to drought stress, which range from seemingly simple morphological or physiological traits that serve as important stress tolerance markers to major upheavals in gene expression in which a large number of transcription factors are induced. Studies on contrasting crop genotypes or genetic engineering of crops help in differentiating responses to drought from those leading to drought tolerance. Of specific importance to crop plants is not whether they survive stress, but whether they show good yields under stress conditions.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1186/1471-2164-11-69

10.1105/tpc.006130

Abedi T., 2010, Antioxidant enzyme changes in response to drought stress in ten cultivars of oilseed rape ( Brassica napus L.), Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 46, 27, 10.17221/67/2009-CJGPB

10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.601

10.1093/aob/mcn094

Barker T., 2005, Improving drought tolerance in maize, Plant Breed. Rev., 25, 173

10.1007/978-3-540-39402-0_2

10.1080/07352680590910410

10.2135/cropsci2006.07.0495

10.1007/s10722-008-9357-3

10.1078/0176-1617-01126

10.1017/S0021859610000742

10.1071/AR05069

10.1071/FP11101

10.1186/1471-2164-12-356

10.1073/pnas.0306974101

10.1104/pp.108.118828

10.1093/mp/ssn083

10.1093/aob/mcn125

Cheeseman J. M., 2007, Hydrogen peroxide and plant stress: a challenging relationship, Plant Stress, 1, 4

10.1016/j.pbi.2008.12.006

10.1104/pp.108.118117

10.21273/JASHS.131.3.338

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01835.x

10.1023/A:1015501205303

10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01941-4

10.1016/S0065-2113(05)86002-X

10.1266/ggs.81.77

10.1016/j.tplants.2007.10.005

10.1101/gr.093302.109

10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00796.x

10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00667.x

10.1073/pnas.252637799

10.1093/aob/mcn093

10.1093/jxb/46.10.1543

10.1093/jxb/erp194

10.1007/s00299-010-0956-z

10.1016/j.pbi.2009.07.014

10.1093/jxb/erl225

10.1371/journal.pone.0007531

10.1023/B:PLAN.0000006944.61384.11

Hsaio T. C., 2000, Sensitivity of growth of roots versus leaves to water stress: biophysical analysis and relation to water transport, J. Exp. Bot., 51, 1596

10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01096.x

10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01057.x

10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81872-9

10.1093/jexbot/49.327.1715

10.1016/j.bbabio.2011.04.012

10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02223-3

Jiang Y., 2010, Antioxidative responses and candidate gene expression in prairie junegrass under drought stress, J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 135, 303, 10.21273/JASHS.135.4.303

10.1023/A:1006319732410

10.1007/s00425-006-0361-6

10.1104/pp.124.1.71

10.1104/pp.110.160846

10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02782.x

10.1055/s-2005-837471

Kumar A. M.M John M. Z.Gul W.Bimolata andI. A.Ghazi 2011:Differential Responses of Non‐enzymatic Antioxidative System under Water Deficit Condition in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). International Proceedings of Chemical Biological and Environmental Engineering. 9 IACSIT Press Singapore.

10.1074/jbc.M209694200

Lambers H., 2005, Plant Respiration: From Cell to Ecosystem. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration Series, 1, 10.1007/1-4020-3589-6

10.1007/s11032-004-7604-7

10.1093/jxb/erq192

10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00814.x

10.1093/aob/mcn244

10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00638.x

10.1186/gb-2007-8-4-r49

10.1534/genetics.107.077297

10.1104/pp.109.135327

Mazid M., 2011, Role of Nitric oxide in regulation of H2O2 mediating tolerance of plants to abiotic stress: A synergistic signaling approach, J. Stress Physiol. Biochem., 7, 34

McKersie B. D., 1996, Water‐deficit tolerance and field performance of transgenic alfalfa overexpressing superoxide dismutase, Plant Physiol., 111, 117, 10.1104/pp.111.4.1177

10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02041.x

Molnar I., 2002, The effects of drought stress on the photosynthetic processes of wheat and of Aegilops biuncialis genotypes originating from various habitats, Acta Biol. Szeged., 46, 115

10.1016/0378-4290(94)00100-Q

10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.07.015

10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01708.x

10.2499/0896295354

10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.333

10.1104/pp.104.059147

10.1093/nar/gkl408

10.1104/pp.108.130682

10.1093/jxb/erl273

10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092945

10.1016/j.pbi.2011.02.001

10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00584.x

10.1139/g03-140

10.1080/07352680600563876

10.1023/A:1026754404857

10.1016/j.tplants.2003.09.015

10.1016/j.pbi.2008.02.005

10.1104/pp.103.033431

Ribaut J. M., 2004, Physiology and Biotechnology Integration for Plant Breeding, 571

10.1016/S1369-5266(99)80036-3

10.1007/s11120-006-9097-1

10.4161/psb.20505

Saeed M., 2011, QTL mapping for physiology, yield and plant architecture traits in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) grown under well‐watered versus water‐stress conditions, Electron. J. Biotechnol., 14, 1

10.1007/BF00025220

10.1104/pp.104.046599

10.1016/j.tplants.2005.04.008

10.1038/nature08122

10.1111/j.1365-3040.2003.01134.x

10.1093/jxb/erh022

10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01359.x

10.7150/ijbs.4.8

10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00798.x

10.1038/462575a

10.1016/S1369-5266(03)00092-X

10.1016/j.bbagrm.2008.04.004

10.1016/S0005-2728(00)00181-X

10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00247-2

10.1007/s00425-007-0612-1

10.1016/j.gene.2006.10.009

10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02678.x

10.4161/psb.5.7.11769

10.1105/tpc.106.041673

10.1105/tpc.104.022046

10.1016/j.pbi.2009.12.012

10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00191-6

10.1016/j.sajb.2010.08.004

10.1105/tpc.104.022699

10.1016/j.tplants.2006.06.003

10.4161/psb.3.8.6186

10.1016/j.tplants.2010.02.002

10.1196/annals.1391.017

10.1093/jexbot/52.362.1817

10.1111/j.1774-7909.2008.00638.x

10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03623.x

10.1105/tpc.109.072694

10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02052.x

10.1023/A:1027371906349

10.1105/tpc.000596

10.1104/pp.106.084632

10.1016/j.pbi.2010.10.003

10.1104/pp.110.1.249

10.4161/psb.6.1.14192

10.1104/pp.107.113076

10.1016/j.tplants.2004.12.012

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01597.x

10.1093/mp/ssq016

10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04092.x

10.1104/pp.109.146803